| Literature DB >> 30065165 |
Muhammed Ashraful Alam1, Kanittha Chamroonsawasdi2, Natkamol Chansatitporn3, Chokchai Munsawaengsub4, Md Shafiqul Islam5.
Abstract
Women's fertility decision is quite difficult in male-dominant rural culture due to their poor reproductive autonomy. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in rural community of Bangladesh between November 2017 and February 2018 among 1285 respondents selected by multi-stage stratified sampling to explore regional variations of rural women's fertility control behavior and its determinants using hierarchical and other inferential statistics. Data collection was done by face-to-face interview using questionnaire. Average parity was 2.5 per woman and 41% respondents had three or more children. About 60% of them used modern contraceptives (MCs) and oral contraceptive pill (OCP) was their first choice. Male participation in contraceptive use was less than 5%. Regional variation, women's empowerment, fertility control knowledge, family planning (FP) attitude, social influence, perceived behavioral control (PBC) and fertility intention were significant predictors of fertility control behavior (p < 0.05). Significant regional variations were determined in fertility control behavior of rural women (p < 0.05). Almost all of its predictors explained by Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) also showed significant regional variations (p < 0.05). Current fertility control policy should be strengthened more not only to improve fertility behavior of rural women but also to establish regional equity in fertility control by improving their reproductive decision-making in a rational way.Entities:
Keywords: Bangladesh; fertility control; hierarchical analysis; regional variation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30065165 PMCID: PMC6116072 DOI: 10.3390/bs8080068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-328X
Figure 1Multistage sampling.
Variables of hierarchical model to predict fertility control behavior of rural women.
| Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background Factors | Components from TPB | Regional Effect | |
| Age | FP attitude | Region | Fertility control behavior |
TPB = Theory of Planned Behavior, FP = Family planning, PBC = Perceived behavioral control.
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents (n = 1285).
| Socio-Demographic Characteristics | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ≤20 | 358 | 27.9 |
| 21–35 | 572 | 44.5 |
| ≥36 | 355 | 27.6 |
| Mean (SD) | 27.7 (±7.8) years | |
| Min–Max | 18–46 years | |
|
| ||
| ≤25 | 151 | 11.8 |
| 26–35 | 672 | 52.2 |
| ≥36 | 462 | 36.0 |
| Mean (SD) | 34.8 (±8.7) years | |
| Min–Max | 21–60 years | |
|
| ||
| Islam | 1153 | 89.7 |
| Hindu | 132 | 10.3 |
|
| ||
| Illiterate | 281 | 21.9 |
| Primary | 628 | 48.9 |
| Junior School Certificate | 275 | 21.4 |
| Secondary School Certificate and above | 101 | 7.8 |
|
| ||
| Illiterate | 343 | 26.7 |
| Primary | 529 | 41.2 |
| Junior School Certificate | 219 | 17.0 |
| Secondary School Certificate and above | 194 | 15.1 |
|
| ||
| ≤8000 | 489 | 38.1 |
| 8001–12,000 | 602 | 46.8 |
| ≥12,001 | 194 | 15.1 |
| Mean (SD) | 10,480 (±5261) Taka | |
| Min–Max | 5000–60,000 Taka | |
|
| ||
| Housewife | 1152 | 89.6 |
| Day laborer | 66 | 5.1 |
| Factory worker | 29 | 2.3 |
| Business | 16 | 1.3 |
| Govt./private employee | 22 | 1.7 |
|
| ||
| Agricultural worker | 710 | 55.2 |
| Day laborer | 223 | 17.4 |
| Factory worker | 89 | 6.9 |
| Business | 181 | 14.1 |
| Govt./private employee | 82 | 6.4 |
|
| ||
| Nuclear | 478 | 37.2 |
| Extended | 807 | 62.8 |
|
| ||
| ≤4 | 326 | 25.3 |
| 5–6 | 646 | 50.3 |
| ≥7 | 313 | 24.4 |
| Mean (SD) | 5.5 (±1.6) | |
| Min–Max | 3–11 | |
Reproductive characteristics of respondents (n = 1285).
| Reproductive Characteristics | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| ≤15 | 223 | 17.4 |
| 16–17 | 790 | 61.5 |
| ≥18 | 272 | 21.1 |
| Mean (SD) | 16.6 (±1.1) years | |
| Min–Max | 14–20 years | |
|
| ||
| ≤17 | 357 | 27.8 |
| 18–19 | 652 | 50.8 |
| ≥20 | 276 | 21.4 |
| Mean (SD) | 18.2 (±1.3) years | |
| Min–Max | 16–22 years | |
|
| ||
| 1 | 422 | 32.9 |
| 2 | 309 | 24.0 |
| 3–4 | 389 | 30.3 |
| >4 | 165 | 12.8 |
| Mean (SD) | 2.5 (±1.5) | |
| Min–Max | 1–8 | |
|
| ||
| 1 | 425 | 33.1 |
| 2 | 316 | 24.6 |
| 3–4 | 423 | 32.9 |
| >4 | 121 | 9.4 |
| Mean (SD) | 2.5 (±1.3) | |
| Min–Max | 1–8 | |
|
| ||
| 1 | 433 | 33.7 |
| 2 | 323 | 25.1 |
| 3–4 | 457 | 35.6 |
| >4 | 72 | 5.6 |
| Mean (SD) | 2.4 (±1.3) | |
| Min–Max | 1–7 | |
|
| ||
| <2 | 618 | 48.1 |
| ≥2 | 667 | 51.9 |
| Mean (SD) | 1.6 (±0.7) years | |
| Min–Max | 1–4 years | |
|
| ||
| Never | 515 | 40.1 |
| Sometimes | 112 | 8.7 |
| Very often | 34 | 2.6 |
| Always | 624 | 48.6 |
|
| ||
| Oral pill | 417 | 54.2 |
| Injection | 173 | 22.5 |
| Norplant | 28 | 3.6 |
| Copper-T | 21 | 2.7 |
| Condom | 58 |
|
| Vasectomy/ligation | 73 | 9.5 |
Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for variables predicting rural women’s fertility control behavior (n = 1285).
| Variable | Model1 | Model2 | Model3 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Constant | −13.66 | 0.78 | −20.00 | 0.88 | −19.77 | 0.88 | |||
| Age | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.17 *** | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.10 * | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.07 |
| Family income | 3.8 × 10−5 | 0.00 | 0.04 * | 2.2 × 10−5 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 1.8 × 10−5 | 0.20 | 0.02 |
| Educational level | |||||||||
| Up to primary | 1.33 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.71 | 0.27 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| Above primary | 1.49 | 0.37 | 0.15 | 0.44 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.03 |
| Number of children | 0.02 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.05 |
| Empowerment | 0.20 | 0.02 | 0.23 *** | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.09 *** | 0.08 | 0.02 | 0.09 *** |
| Fertility preference | 0.28 | 0.03 | 0.21 *** | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| Fertility knowledge | 1.02 | 0.06 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 0.06 | 0.20 *** | 0.54 | 0.06 | 0.20 *** |
| FP attitude | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.12 *** | 0.17 | 0.03 | 0.12 *** | |||
| Social influence | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.12 *** | 0.15 | 0.03 | 0.11 *** | |||
| PBC | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.22 *** | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.22 *** | |||
| Spousal status | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | |||
| Fertility control intention | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.20 *** | 0.25 | 0.03 | 0.20 *** | |||
| Regional status | |||||||||
| Dhaka division | 0.46 | 0.19 | 0.05 * | ||||||
| Rajshahi division | 0.51 | 0.20 | 0.05 * | ||||||
|
| 0.556 | 0.664 | 0.666 | ||||||
| 199.49 *** | 81.98 *** | 4.06 * | |||||||
(†) Educational level was represented as two dummy variables with illiterate serving as the reference group. In the case of regional status, Chittagong division was the reference group. One star (*) for just significant (p < 0.05) and three stars (***) for very highly significant (p < 0.001).
Regional variations in fertility control behavior and its related factors by Kruskal–Wallis and one-way ANOVA test (n = 1285).
| Characteristics | Mean Score ± (SD) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National ( | Rajshahi ( | Dhaka ( | Chittagong ( | ||
| Fertility control behavior | 8.9 (4.6) | 9.7 (4.5) | 9.1 (4.7) | 7.8 (4.3) | <0.001 *** |
| FP attitude | 30.1 (3.3) | 30.6 (3.3) | 30.1 (3.2) | 29.5 (3.4) | <0.001 *** |
| Social influence | 29.0 (3.6) | 29.6 (3.3) | 29.3 (3.5) | 28.0 (3.4) | <0.001 *** |
| PBC | 21.6 (4.3) | 22.2 (4.1) | 21.6 (4.3) | 20.9 (4.5) | <0.001 *** |
| Fertility control intention | 20.9 (3.6) | 21.5 (3.2) | 20.8 (3.4) | 20.2 (4.0) | <0.001 *** |
| Spousal status | 7.6 (3.1) | 8.0 (3.1) | 7.8 (3.2) | 6.9 (2.8) | <0.001 *** |
| Fertility preference | 20.1 (3.5) | 20.5 (3.4) | 20.1 (3.4) | 19.7 (3.6) | <0.01 ** |
| Fertility control knowledge | 5.6 (1.7) | 5.8 (1.7) | 5.6 (1.6) | 5.5 (1.8) | 0.120 |
| Women’s empowerment | 34.3 (5.2) | 35.7 (5.0) | 34.1 (5.4) | 33.1 (4.8) | <0.001 *** |
Two stars (**) for highly significant (p < 0.01) and three stars (***) for very highly significant (p < 0.001).