Deborah Carpenter1, Susan Hassell2, Russ Mardon3, Shannon Fair2, Maurice Johnson4, Sari Siegel5, Mary Nix6. 1. is Senior Study Director, Westat, Rockville, MD. Electronic address: DeborahCarpenter@Westat.com. 2. is Senior Study Director, Westat. 3. is Associate Director, Westat. 4. is Research Analyst, Westat. 5. is Vice President, Health Care Research, The Hospital and Healthsystem Association of Pennsylvania, Harrisburg. 6. is Deputy Director, Division of Practice Improvement (previously, Health Scientist Administrator), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diffusion of innovations can be a slow process, posing a major challenge to quality improvement in health care. Learning communities can provide a rich, collaborative environment that supports the adoption of health care innovations and motivates organizational change. From 2014-2016, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Innovations Exchange established and supported three learning communities focused on adopting innovations in three high-priority areas: (1) advancing the practice of patient- and family-centered care in hospitals, (2) promoting medication therapy management for at-risk populations, and (3) reducing non-urgent emergency services. METHODS: Members of each learning community worked collaboratively in facilitated settings to adapt and implement strategies featured in the Health Care Innovations Exchange, receiving technical assistance from content experts. Project staff conducted a mixed methods evaluation of the initiative, both formative and summative. RESULTS: The activities and outcomes of the three learning communities provided insights about how this approach can support local implementation efforts, and about factors influencing innovation adoption. Using a qualitative synthesis method, lessons were identified related to learning community startup (recruitment and goal setting), learning community operations (engagement, collaborative decision-making, and sustainability), and innovation implementation (changing care delivery processes and/or policies). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this work indicate that the learning community model of group learning can serve as an effective method to support dissemination and implementation of innovations, and to achieve desired outcomes in local settings.
BACKGROUND: Diffusion of innovations can be a slow process, posing a major challenge to quality improvement in health care. Learning communities can provide a rich, collaborative environment that supports the adoption of health care innovations and motivates organizational change. From 2014-2016, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Innovations Exchange established and supported three learning communities focused on adopting innovations in three high-priority areas: (1) advancing the practice of patient- and family-centered care in hospitals, (2) promoting medication therapy management for at-risk populations, and (3) reducing non-urgent emergency services. METHODS: Members of each learning community worked collaboratively in facilitated settings to adapt and implement strategies featured in the Health Care Innovations Exchange, receiving technical assistance from content experts. Project staff conducted a mixed methods evaluation of the initiative, both formative and summative. RESULTS: The activities and outcomes of the three learning communities provided insights about how this approach can support local implementation efforts, and about factors influencing innovation adoption. Using a qualitative synthesis method, lessons were identified related to learning community startup (recruitment and goal setting), learning community operations (engagement, collaborative decision-making, and sustainability), and innovation implementation (changing care delivery processes and/or policies). CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this work indicate that the learning community model of group learning can serve as an effective method to support dissemination and implementation of innovations, and to achieve desired outcomes in local settings.
Authors: Juliet Iwelunmor; Joseph D Tucker; Chisom Obiezu-Umeh; Titilola Gbaja-Biamila; David Oladele; Ucheoma Nwaozuru; Adesola Z Musa; Collins O Airhihenbuwa; Kathryn Muessig; Nora Rosenberg; Rhonda BeLue; Hong Xian; Donaldson F Conserve; Jason J Ong; Lei Zhang; Jamie Curley; Susan Nkengasong; Stacey Mason; Weiming Tang; Barry Bayus; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Oliver Ezechi Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-11-17 Impact factor: 2.261
Authors: Sheila Dunn; Sarah Munro; Courtney Devane; Edith Guilbert; Dahn Jeong; Eleni Stroulia; Judith A Soon; Wendy V Norman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2022-05-05 Impact factor: 7.076
Authors: Monique W van den Hoed; Ramona Backhaus; Erica de Vries; Jan P H Hamers; Ramon Daniëls Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-08-05 Impact factor: 2.908
Authors: Ilyse Kenis; Sofie Theys; Ella Hermie; Veerle Foulon; Ann Van Hecke Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-30 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Jenny Ploeg; Sabrina T Wong; Kasra Hassani; Marie-Lee Yous; Martin Fortin; Claire Kendall; Clare Liddy; Maureen Markle-Reid; Bojana Petrovic; Emilie Dionne; Cathie M Scott; Walter P Wodchis Journal: Prim Health Care Res Dev Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 1.458