| Literature DB >> 30064309 |
Xiang Gao1, Wenhuan Xu1, Tingxun Lu1, Jialiang Zhou1, Xiaosong Ge1, Dong Hua1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer has been proved more difficult to treat owing to potently malignant metastasis. The present study was aimed to explore the functional role of miR-142-3p in cell migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells, as well as its underlying mechanism.Entities:
Keywords: RAC1; colorectal cancer; invasion; microRNA-142-3p
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30064309 PMCID: PMC6069031 DOI: 10.1177/1533033818790508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1533-0338
Figure 1.RAC1 expression by Western blot and immunohistochemistry (IHC). A, RAC1 expression in SW480 cells transfected with NC/miR-142-3p/ miR-142-3p silencer was analyzed by Western blot. β-Actin was used as control. B, RAC1 expression in CRC tissue microarrays by IHC. The upper right number represents the IHC score.
Figure 2.RAC1 affected migration and invasion of colorectal cell line SW480. Migrating and invading cells were stained by crystal violet and photographed (n = 3, *P < .05).
Figure 3.Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival for patients with low versus high levels of RAC1.
Correlation Between Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (RAC1) Expression and Clinicopathological Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer.
| Characteristics | Cases | RAC1 Expression | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low (135) | High (57) | |||
| Gender | .611 | |||
| Male | 99 | 68 | 31 | |
| Female | 93 | 67 | 26 | |
| Age (mean = 62) | .394 | |||
| <62 | 100 | 54 | 46 | |
| ≥60 | 97 | 46 | 51 | |
| Clinical stage | .029 | |||
| I | 34 | 25 | 91 | |
| II | 67 | 46 | 21 | |
| III | 81 | 61 | 20 | |
| IV | 10 | 3 | 7 | |
| T | .932 | |||
| T1-2 | 47 | 33 | 14 | |
| T3 | 101 | 72 | 29 | |
| T4 | 44 | 30 | 14 | |
| N | .712 | |||
| N0 | 102 | 71 | 31 | |
| N1 | 53 | 36 | 17 | |
| N2 | 37 | 28 | 9 | |
| M | .012 | |||
| M0 | 182 | 132 | 50 | |
| M1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | |
Univariate Analysis for Overall Survival (Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model).
| Cases | OS (days) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage | I | 34 | 3604 | <.0001 |
| II | 67 | 3556 | ||
| III | 81 | 2585 | ||
| IV | 10 | 591 | ||
| pT | T1 + 2 | 47 | 3703 | .001 |
| T3 | 101 | 3006 | ||
| T4 | 44 | 2200 | ||
| pN | N0 | 102 | 3569 | <.0001 |
| N1 | 53 | 2528 | ||
| N2 | 37 | 2229 | ||
| pM | M0 | 182 | 3162 | <.0001 |
| M1 | 10 | 591 | ||
| RAC1 | Low | 135 | 3259 | .007 |
| High | 57 | 1657 |
Abbreviation: OS, overall survival.
Multivariate Analysis for Overall Survival (Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Model).
| HR (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Stage | ||
| I vs II vs III vs IV | 0.999 (0.525-1.899) | .997 |
| N | ||
| N0 vs N1 vs N2 | 1.690 (1.056-2.705) | .029 |
| T | ||
| T1 + 2 vs T3 vs T4 | 1.594 (1.104-2.300) | .013 |
| M | ||
| M0 vs M1 | 3.866 (1.268-11.784) | .017 |
| RAC1 | ||
| Low vs High | 1.925 (1.178-3.145) | .009 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazards ratio.