Literature DB >> 30063332

Free Radical Initiated Peptide Sequencing for Direct Site Localization of Sulfation and Phosphorylation with Negative Ion Mode Mass Spectrometry.

Nicholas B Borotto1, Kevin M Ileka1, Christina A T M B Tom1, Brent R Martin1, Kristina Håkansson1.   

Abstract

Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is the primary method for discovering, identifying, and localizing post-translational modifications (PTMs) in proteins. However, conventional positive ion mode collision induced dissociation (CID)-based MS/MS often fails to yield site-specific information for labile and acidic modifications due to low ionization efficiency in positive ion mode and/or preferential PTM loss. While a number of alternative methods have been developed to address this issue, most require specialized instrumentation or indirect detection. In this work, we present an amine-reactive TEMPO-based free radical initiated peptide sequencing (FRIPS) approach for negative ion mode analysis of phosphorylated and sulfated peptides. FRIPS-based fragmentation generates sequence informative ions for both phosphorylated and sulfated peptides with no significant PTM loss. Furthermore, FRIPS is compared to positive ion mode CID, electron transfer dissociation (ETD), as well as negative ion mode electron capture dissociation (niECD) and CID, both in terms of sequence coverage and fragmentation efficiency for phospho- and sulfo-peptides. Because FRIPS-based fragmentation has no particular instrumentation requirements and shows limited PTM loss, we propose this approach as a promising alternative to current techniques for analysis of labile and acidic PTMs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30063332      PMCID: PMC6235672          DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  32 in total

1.  Analysis of sulfated peptides using positive electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  J F Nemeth-Cawley; S Karnik; J C Rouse
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Comparison of CID, ETD and metastable atom-activated dissociation (MAD) of doubly and triply charged phosphorylated tau peptides.

Authors:  Shannon L Cook; Carolyn M Zimmermann; David Singer; Maria Fedorova; Ralf Hoffmann; Glen P Jackson
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.982

3.  Metastable atom-activated dissociation mass spectrometry of phosphorylated and sulfonated peptides in negative ion mode.

Authors:  Shannon L Cook; Glen P Jackson
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Characterization of O-sulfopeptides by negative ion mode tandem mass spectrometry: superior performance of negative ion electron capture dissociation.

Authors:  Katherine E Hersberger; Kristina Håkansson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Electron transfer dissociation of peptide anions.

Authors:  Joshua J Coon; Jeffrey Shabanowitz; Donald F Hunt; John E P Syka
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Negative electron transfer dissociation of deprotonated phosphopeptide anions: choice of radical cation reagent and competition between electron and proton transfer.

Authors:  Malwina Huzarska; Israel Ugalde; Desmond A Kaplan; Ralf Hartmer; Michael L Easterling; Nick C Polfer
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Electron capture dissociation of tyrosine O-sulfated peptides complexed with divalent metal cations.

Authors:  Haichuan Liu; Kristina Håkansson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Liquid secondary-ion mass spectrometry of peptides containing multiple tyrosine-O-sulfates.

Authors:  T Yagami; K Kitagawa; S Futaki
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry for Phosphopeptide Characterization in the Positive and Negative Ion Modes.

Authors:  Michelle R Robinson; Juliana M Taliaferro; Kevin N Dalby; Jennifer S Brodbelt
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jesper V Olsen; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 5.911

View more
  5 in total

1.  Gas-Phase Hydrogen/Deuterium Scrambling in Negative-Ion Mode Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Qingyi Wang; Nicholas B Borotto; Kristina Håkansson
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Free Radical-Initiated Peptide Sequencing Mass Spectrometry for Phosphopeptide Post-translational Modification Analysis.

Authors:  Inae Jang; Aeran Jeon; Suk Gyu Lim; Duk Ki Hong; Min Soo Kim; Jae Hyeong Jo; Sang Tak Lee; Bongjin Moon; Han Bin Oh
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  New free radical-initiated peptide sequencing (FRIPS) mass spectrometry reagent with high conjugation efficiency enabling single-step peptide sequencing.

Authors:  Sang Tak Lee; Hyemi Park; Inae Jang; Choong Sik Lee; Bongjin Moon; Han Bin Oh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  The Key Role of Metal Adducts in the Differentiation of Phosphopeptide from Sulfopeptide Sequences by High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Susy Piovesana; Anna Laura Capriotti; Chiara Cavaliere; Andrea Cerrato; Carmela Maria Montone; Riccardo Zenezini Chiozzi; Aldo Laganà
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 8.008

Review 5.  Phosphopeptide Fragmentation and Site Localization by Mass Spectrometry: An Update.

Authors:  Clement M Potel; Simone Lemeer; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.986

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.