Literature DB >> 30062939

Activity levels and return to work after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in patients under 65 years of age.

C E H Scott1, G S Turnbull2, M F R Powell-Bowns1, D J MacDonald1, S J Breusch1.   

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of return to work (RTW) after revision lower limb arthroplasty in patients of working age in the United Kingdom. Patients and
Methods: We assessed 55 patients aged ≤ 65 years after revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). There were 43 women and 12 men with a mean age of 54 years (23 to 65). We also reviewed 30 patients after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There were 14 women and 16 men with a mean age of 58 years (48 to 64). Preoperatively, age, gender, body mass index, social deprivation, mode of failure, length of primary implant survival, work status and nature, activity level (University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score), and Oxford Hip and Knee Scores were recorded. Postoperatively, RTW status, Oxford Hip and Knee Scores, EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), UCLA score, and Work, Osteoarthritis and Joint-Replacement Questionnaire (WORQ) scores were obtained. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed.
Results: Overall, 95% (52/55) of patients were working before their revision THA. Afterwards, 33% (17/52) RTW by one year, 48% (25/52) had retired, and 19% (10/52) were receiving welfare benefit. RTW was associated with age, postoperative Oxford Hip Score, early THA failure (less than two years), mode of failure dislocation, and contralateral revision (p < 0.05). No patient returned to work after revision for dislocation. Only age remained a significant factor on multivariate analysis (p = 0.003), with 79% (11/14) of those less than 50 years of age returning to work, compared with 16% (6/38) of those aged fifty years or over. Before revision TKA, 93% (28/30) of patients were working. Postoperatively only 7% (2/28) returned to work by one year, 71% (20/28) had retired, and 21% (6/28) were receiving welfare benefits. UCLA scores improved after 43% of revision THAs and 44% of revision TKAs.
Conclusion: After revision THA, age is the most significant predictor of RTW: only 16% of those over 50 years old return to work. Fewer patients return to work after early revision THA and none after revision for dislocation. After revision TKA, patients rarely return to work: none return to heavy or moderate manual work. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:1043-53.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity level; Return to work; Revision hip arthroplasty; Revision knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30062939     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B8.BJJ-2017-1557.R2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  12 in total

1.  Rigour will be important post-COVID-19.

Authors:  Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 2.  [Postoperative outcomes and survival rates after aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty : What can patients expect from revision surgery?]

Authors:  Manuela Hoffmann; Johannes C Reichert; Anastasia Rakow; Janosch Schoon; Georgi I Wassilew
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-23

Review 3.  A meta-analysis assessing time for return to sport following hip resurfacing.

Authors:  A Magan; W Wignadasan; B Kayani; G Radhakrishnan; F Ronca; F S Haddad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 2.928

4.  Revision total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Stirling; Scott D Middleton; Ivan J Brenkel; Phil J Walmsley
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-10-27

5.  Restarting elective orthopaedic services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Do patients want to have surgery?

Authors:  Justin Chang; Warran Wignadasan; Christina Kontoghiorghe; Babar Kayani; Sandeep Singh; Ricci Plastow; Ahmed Magan; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-11-01

6.  Elective orthopaedic surgery with a designated COVID-19-free pathway results in low perioperative viral transmission rates.

Authors:  Justin S Chang; Warran Wignadasan; Raj Pradhan; Christina Kontoghiorghe; Babar Kayani; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2020-09-14

7.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Presenteeism and Absenteeism Before and After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mark A Fontana; Wasif Islam; Michelle A Richardson; Cathlyn K Medina; Alexander S McLawhorn; Catherine H MacLean
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Effect of knee arthroplasty on sports participation and activity levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco J Konings; Henri De Vroey; Ive Weygers; Kurt Claeys
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-06-23

10.  Association between patient survival following reoperation after total hip replacement and the reason for reoperation: an analysis of 9,926 patients in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Peter Cnudde; Erik Bülow; Szilard Nemes; Yosef Tyson; Maziar Mohaddes; Ola Rolfson
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.