| Literature DB >> 30062849 |
Meng Li1, Xiuju Bian1,2, Rui Jing1,3, Aijun Zhang1, Nianzheng Sun1, Xiuli Ju1, Fuhai Li1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to explore the influence of clinical features of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) and a refined therapeutic protocol on the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in children in the past five years.Entities:
Keywords: Children; prognosis; rhabdomyosarcoma; therapeutic efficacy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30062849 PMCID: PMC6119622 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.12823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Thorac Cancer ISSN: 1759-7706 Impact factor: 3.500
Age and gender information of children with RMS
| Age (months) | Total | Boys | Girls |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 12 | 5 (12.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 2 (5%) |
| 13–36 | 9 (22.5%) | 7 (17.5%) | 2 (5%) |
| 37–60 | 8 (20%) | 3 (7.5%) | 5 (12.5%) |
| 61–120 | 7 (17.5%) | 4 (10%) | 3 (7.5) |
| 121–204 | 13 (32.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 8 (20%) |
|
|
|
|
|
| Total | 40 (100%) | 22 (55%) | 18 (45%) |
RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma.
Stages and risk groups of children with RMS
| Stage | Boys | Girls | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) |
| II | 8 (20%) | 1 (2.5%) | 9 (22.5%) |
| III | 4 (10%) | 2 (5%) | 6 (15%) |
| IV | 10 (20%) | 13 (32.5%) | 23 (57.5%) |
| Group | Boys | Girls | Total |
| Low‐risk | 0 (0%) | 2 (5%) | 2 (5%) |
| Medium‐risk | 12 (30%) | 3 (7.5%) | 15 (37.5%) |
| High‐risk | 10 (25%) | 13 (32.5) | 23 (57.5) |
RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma.
Primary tumor occurrence sites in children with RMS
| Gender | Total | Intracranial | Head and neck | Mediastinum | Urinary/reproductive system | Limb | Abdominal cavity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boys | 22 (55%) | 1 (2.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 2 (5%) | 7 (17.5%) | 4 (10%) | 3 (7.5%) |
| Girls | 18 (45%) | 1 (2.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 1 (2.5%) | 3 (7.5%) | 5 (12.5%) | 3 (7.5%) |
| Total | 40 (100%) | 2 (5%) | 10 (25%) | 3 (7.5%) | 10 (25%) | 9 (22.5%) | 6 (15%) |
RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma.
Figure 1Survival curve for children with rhabdomyosarcoma. () Medium‐risk (untreated), () High‐risk (untreated), () Low‐risk, () Medium‐risk, and () High‐risk.