A-M L Wegeberg1, C Brock1,2, B Brock3, A D Farmer1,4,5, A R Hobson6, J R Semler7, S M Scott5. 1. Mech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg and Clinical Institute, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. 2. Department of Pharmacotherapy and Development, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Steno Diabetes Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke on Trent, Staffordshire, UK. 5. Academic Surgical Unit & Neurogastroenterology Group, Centre for Neuroscience and Trauma Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. 6. The Functional Gut Clinic, London, UK. 7. Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, such as nausea and bloating, are common in people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Autonomic dysfunction can lead to changes in the GI secreto-motor function which can be associated with GI symptom development. We hypothesized that regional pH profiles in T1DM differs from health and would be associated with objective physiological/clinical markers. METHODS:Forty-seven T1DM with confirmed diabetic sensory peripheral neuropathy and41 healthy age-matched subjects underwentstandardized wireless motility capsule testing. T1DM completed the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale. Disease duration, glycemic control, insulin usage, and 24-hour heart rate variability testing were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: In comparison to healthy subjects, gastric, and large bowel median pH were lower in T1DM (1.8 ± 1.6 vs 2.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.001 and 6.7 ± 0.6 vs 7.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, change in pH across the pylorus was lower while change in pH across the ileocecal junction was higher in T1DM (5.2 ± 1.5 vs 5.8 ± 0.5, P = 0.003 and 1.8 ± 0.4 vs 1.3 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001, respectively). No difference was found in small bowel median pH. Gastric median pH was associated with small bowel transit time (r = 0.30, P = 0.049). Change in pH across the pylorus was negatively associated with fasting glycose (r = -0.35, P = 0.027). Small bowel median pH was associated with nausea (r = 0.42, P = 0.005) and small bowel transit time (r = 0.48, P = 0.0007). Large bowel median pH was associated with nausea (r = 0.35, P = 0.018) and the total GCSI score (r = 0.34, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The GI pH profile in T1DM with DSPN is different from healthy subjects. Changes in pH profile may have important therapeutic implications and influence pharmacotherapeutic bioavailability.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, such as nausea and bloating, are common in people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Autonomic dysfunction can lead to changes in the GI secreto-motor function which can be associated with GI symptom development. We hypothesized that regional pH profiles in T1DM differs from health and would be associated with objective physiological/clinical markers. METHODS: Forty-seven T1DM with confirmed diabetic sensory peripheral neuropathy and 41 healthy age-matched subjects underwent standardized wireless motility capsule testing. T1DM completed the gastroparesis cardinal symptom index (GCSI) and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale. Disease duration, glycemic control, insulin usage, and 24-hour heart rate variability testing were evaluated. KEY RESULTS: In comparison to healthy subjects, gastric, and large bowel median pH were lower in T1DM (1.8 ± 1.6 vs 2.9 ± 1.5, P = 0.001 and 6.7 ± 0.6 vs 7.0 ± 0.5, P = 0.003, respectively). Additionally, change in pH across the pylorus was lower while change in pH across the ileocecal junction was higher in T1DM (5.2 ± 1.5 vs 5.8 ± 0.5, P = 0.003 and 1.8 ± 0.4 vs 1.3 ± 0.4, P < 0.0001, respectively). No difference was found in small bowel median pH. Gastric median pH was associated with small bowel transit time (r = 0.30, P = 0.049). Change in pH across the pylorus was negatively associated with fasting glycose (r = -0.35, P = 0.027). Small bowel median pH was associated with nausea (r = 0.42, P = 0.005) and small bowel transit time (r = 0.48, P = 0.0007). Large bowel median pH was associated with nausea (r = 0.35, P = 0.018) and the total GCSI score (r = 0.34, P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: The GI pH profile in T1DM with DSPN is different from healthy subjects. Changes in pH profile may have important therapeutic implications and influence pharmacotherapeutic bioavailability.
Authors: Anne-Marie Langmach Wegeberg; Christian Stevns Hansen; Adam D Farmer; Jesper Scott Karmisholt; Asbjorn M Drewes; Poul Erik Jakobsen; Birgitte Brock; Christina Brock Journal: United European Gastroenterol J Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.623
Authors: Cornelius J van Beekum; Martin W von Websky; Maria A Willis; Christina Panknin; Martin Coenen; Rolf Fimmers; Jörg C Kalff; Sven Wehner; Tim O Vilz Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2021-10-02 Impact factor: 2.571