Literature DB >> 30062641

Facility-level analysis of robot utilization across disciplines in the National Cancer Database.

Richard J Fantus1, Andrew Cohen1, Christopher B Riedinger1, Kristine Kuchta2, Chi H Wang2, Katharine Yao2, Sangtae Park3.   

Abstract

To evaluate trends in contemporary robotic surgery across multiple organ sites as they relate to robotic prostatectomy volume. We queried the National Cancer Database for patients who underwent surgery from 2010 to 2013 for prostate, kidney, bladder, corpus uteri, uterus, cervix, colon, sigmoid, rectum, lung and bronchus. The trend between volumes of robotic surgery for each organ site was analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Multivariable models were then created to determine independent predictors of robotic surgery within each organ site by calculating the odds ratio with 95% CI. Among the 566,399 surgical cases analyzed, 35.1% were performed using robot assistance. Institutions whose robotic prostatectomy volume was in the top 75 percentile compared to the bottom 25 percentile performed a larger percentage of robotic surgery on the following sites: kidney 32.6 vs. 28.8%, bladder 23.6 vs. 18.6%, uterus 52.5 vs. 47.7%, cervix 43.5 vs. 39.2%, colon 3.2 vs. 2.9%, rectum 10.7 vs. 8.9%, and lung 7.3 vs. 6.8% (all p < 0.0001). It appears that increased trends toward robotic surgery in urology have lead to increased robotic utilization within other surgical fields. Future analysis in benign utilizations of robotic surgery as well as outcome data comparing robotic to open approaches are needed to better understand the ever-evolving nature of minimally invasive surgery within the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Da Vinci; Healthcare trends; Minimally invasive surgery; Prostatectomy; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30062641     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0855-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  5 in total

1.  Robotic proctectomy for rectal cancer in the US: a skewed population.

Authors:  Asya Ofshteyn; Katherine Bingmer; Christopher W Towe; Emily Steinhagen; Sharon L Stein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies.

Authors:  Tarik K Yuce; Ryan J Ellis; Jeanette Chung; Ryan P Merkow; Anthony D Yang; Nathaniel J Soper; Edward J Tanner; Edward M Schaeffer; Karl Y Bilimoria; Gregory B Auffenberg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 3.  Diffusion and adoption of the surgical robot in urology.

Authors:  Anup A Shah; Jathin Bandari; Daniel Pelzman; Benjamin J Davies; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

Review 4.  Single port robotic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrew Lai; Ryan W Dobbs; Susan Talamini; Whitney R Halgrimson; Jessica O Wilson; Hari T Vigneswaran; Simone Crivellaro
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-04

5.  Ultrasound-guided posterior quadratus lumborum block for postoperative pain control after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Bartosz Horosz; Katarzyna Bialowolska; Anna Kociuba; Jakub Dobruch; Malgorzata Malec-Milewska
Journal:  EXCLI J       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.068

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.