Literature DB >> 30062399

Prognostic analysis and liver metastases relevant factors after gastric and hepatic surgical treatment in gastric cancer patients with metachronous liver metastases: a population-based study.

Yibin Xiao1, Bo Zhang1, Yulian Wu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with liver metastases from gastric cancer is very poor. Nevertheless, standard therapeutic strategies have not been established yet. The impact of hepatic surgical treatment on survival of patients with metachronous liver metastases from gastric cancer still remains controversial.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis on records of 436 patients who received radical gastrectomy (with D2 lymphadenectomy, regardless of hepatic surgical treatment) for gastric cancer with metachronous (≥ 3 months after gastrectomy) liver metastases in our center between 2001 and 2016. All patients were followed until 2017/10/31 or withdrawn from the follow-up because of death.
RESULTS: The median interval for non-hepatic metastases of the 436 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy is 14 months. T (P = 0.041), N (P = 0.023) and lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) were independent predictors affecting liver metastases-free interval. The overall survival rates for the 436 patients were 44.5, 29.7, 16.3, and 16.3% at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years respectively since treatment of hepatic metastases, with a median survival time of 11 months. N (P = 0.025), extent of liver metastases (H) (H2 vs. H1, P = 0.036; H3 vs. H1, P < 0.001), and treatment of liver metastatic lesions (P < 0.001) were significant independent prognostic factors for survival after presence of liver metastases. Among H1 and H2 patients, median survival in hepatic surgical treatment group was significantly longer than that in systemic chemotherapy alone group (25 vs. 11 months, P = 0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: Liver examinations should be performed during the first 2 years after gastric surgery and continued for 5 years for high-risk patients. Active therapeutic strategies may prolong patients' survival compared with supportive treatment alone. Patients with H1, H2 metachronous liver metastases may be considered appropriate candidates for hepatic surgical treatment before embarking on systemic chemotherapy alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Registry (Retrospectively registered; Reference number: 35067; Date: 02/04/2018).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastrectomy; Gastric cancer; Hepatic surgical treatment; Metachronous liver metastases; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30062399     DOI: 10.1007/s11845-018-1864-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  4 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes after different treatments for gastric cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minghui Li; Bin Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Chinese consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer with liver metastases.

Authors:  Kecheng Zhang; Lin Chen
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 8.168

3.  The Ratio of the Hemoglobin to Red Cell Distribution Width Combined with the Ratio of Platelets to Lymphocytes Can Predict the Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer Liver Metastasis.

Authors:  Zhao Zhai; Jialiang Gao; Ziyu Zhu; Xiliang Cong; Shenghan Lou; Bangling Han; Xin Yin; Yu Zhang; Yingwei Xue
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Ex vivo liver resection followed by autotransplantation in radical resection of gastric cancer liver metastases: A case report.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Cheng-Cheng Zhang; Yan-Jiao Ou; Lei-Da Zhang
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.337

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.