Literature DB >> 30062277

Lipomatous Hypertrophy of the Interatrial Septum: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Andrew Xanthopoulos1, Gregory Giamouzis1, Nikolaos Alexopoulos2, Takeshi Kitai3, Filippos Triposkiadis1, John Skoularigis1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Imaging modality; Interatrial septum; Lipomatous hypertrophy; Mass

Year:  2017        PMID: 30062277      PMCID: PMC6058280          DOI: 10.1016/j.case.2017.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CASE (Phila)        ISSN: 2468-6441


× No keyword cloud information.

Introduction

Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum (LASH) is a benign lesion characterized by massive accumulation of fat in the interatrial septum that exceeds 2 cm in thickness and is part of the differential diagnosis for malignant and benign atrial tumors. We report a case of an extreme form of LASH, discuss the main features of this lesion and the significant diagnostic role of noninvasive imaging modalities, and briefly review the existing literature.

Case Presentation

A 63-year-old man with suspicion for a malignant cardiac mass was referred from a local hospital for further evaluation. The patient reported mild shortness of breath and palpitations that started 6 months previously. He was obese (body mass index 35 kg/m2) and reported a history of hypertension and diabetes, under pharmaceutical therapy (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and metformin, respectively). The clinical examination revealed a mild to moderate murmur of mitral regurgitation, posteroanterior chest radiography showed a normal cardiac silhouette, and electrocardiography revealed that the patient was in sinus tachycardia with frequent premature atrial contractions. To evaluate the possible cardiac cause of the patient's symptoms, we performed transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), which revealed a massive intracardiac atrial septal lesion partially exceeding 3 cm in width (indicating either an extreme form of a lipomatous septum or a mass) and mild to moderate mitral regurgitation (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Video 1). Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring revealed short but frequent episodes of atrial fibrillation. The next step in the diagnostic algorithm would normally be transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), but the patient was reluctant to undergo the examination. Thus, we performed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), which showed homogeneous bilobar interatrial septal thickening, with sparing of the fossa ovalis. On T1-weighted sequences, the aforementioned thickening had increased signal intensity, similar to subcutaneous and pericardial fat, whereas on T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences with fat suppression, low-intensity signal was seen. In first-pass perfusion images, there were no signs of increased vascularity, and in late gadolinium enhancement images, there was slightly inhomogeneous enhancement. These findings were pathognomonic of an extreme form of LASH (Figure 1, Figure 4, Figure 5, Video 2).
Figure 1

(A) TTE, apical four-chamber view. The red arrow indicates the thickened interatrial septum. (B) CMR of the LASH (star) in four-chamber view: end-diastolic frame of a cine image. Note that LASH spares the fossa ovalis. The arrowhead points to LASH anteriorly to the fossa ovalis. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

Figure 2

TTE, atypical apical four-chamber view. The yellow arrow indicates LASH. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

Figure 3

TTE, subcostal view. The white arrow represents the hypertrophied interatrial septal thickness. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

Figure 4

(A) CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In T1-weighted images, LASH appears bright. (B) CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In T1-weighted images with fat suppression, LASH appears dark. The combination of T1-weighted and T1-weighted images with fat suppression (A,B) is diagnostic for fat.

Figure 5

CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In late gadolinium enhancement images, LASH shows mildly increased signal intensity compared with ventricular myocardium.

(A) TTE, apical four-chamber view. The red arrow indicates the thickened interatrial septum. (B) CMR of the LASH (star) in four-chamber view: end-diastolic frame of a cine image. Note that LASH spares the fossa ovalis. The arrowhead points to LASH anteriorly to the fossa ovalis. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle. TTE, atypical apical four-chamber view. The yellow arrow indicates LASH. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle. TTE, subcostal view. The white arrow represents the hypertrophied interatrial septal thickness. LA, Left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle. (A) CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In T1-weighted images, LASH appears bright. (B) CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In T1-weighted images with fat suppression, LASH appears dark. The combination of T1-weighted and T1-weighted images with fat suppression (A,B) is diagnostic for fat. CMR of LASH (star) in the four-chamber view. In late gadolinium enhancement images, LASH shows mildly increased signal intensity compared with ventricular myocardium. After completing the investigation, we initiated a β-blocker and an anticoagulant (rivaroxaban). The patient was reassured as to the benign nature of the lipomatous lesion and discharged with a recommendation for regular follow-up.

Discussion

LASH was first reported by Prior in 1964. Its prevalence ranges from 2.2% to 8%,2, 3 depending on the diagnostic modality used for its detection (multislice computed tomography vs TEE, respectively). It is a benign lesion of the interatrial septum characterized by massive accumulation of fat >2 cm thick. Although the majority of patients with LASH remain asymptomatic, it is infrequently accompanied by atrial arrhythmias and even more rarely by malignant arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The exact mechanism of malignant arrhythmias in patients with LASH remains unknown, and a number of hypotheses have been proposed. Malignant cardiac arrhythmias may occur (1) as a result of extensive bleeding into the lesion; (2) because of coronary artery disease, which often coexists in the frequently obese and elderly patients with LASH; or (3) as a result of the involvement of the interatrial septum and the wall of the right atrium, which interfere with the architecture of atrial myocytes and subsequently could affect the conducting pathways. The total volume of fat tissue and the characteristic “dome and dip” configuration of the P waves in leads II, III, and aVF of the electrocardiogram have been reported as predictive (risk) factors for the development of arrhythmias.4, 5 Furthermore, the extent of fat toward the superior vena cava may cause its obstruction and symptoms of congestive heart failure. Notably, LASH is associated with obesity and advanced age,2, 3 which are also risk factors for atrial fibrillation. However, the independent relationship between LASH and supraventricular arrhythmias is yet to be established. The optimal therapeutic management of patients with LASH consists of timely diagnosis, patient reassurance, and close follow-up. Nevertheless, surgical resection and septal reconstruction are possible therapeutic interventions in very rare cases of lesions that cause circulatory obstruction or malignant arrhythmias. Data regarding the etiology of LASH remain scarce. Histologically, LASH is characterized by myocardial fibers, infiltrated with mature adipose cells, which are interspersed with fetal fat cells. The fat accumulation is cephalad and caudal to the fossa ovalis, accompanied by sparing of the fossa ovalis itself, which gives LASH its characteristic “dumbbell” shape. Hypertrophy is usually more extensive in the cephalad portion of the interatrial septum compared with the caudal portion, and both parts project into the left and right atrial cavities. The differential diagnosis of LASH includes benign and malignant cardiac tumors involving the interatrial septum, such as metastases, myxomas, rhabdomyomas, fibromas, fibroelastomas, and mesotheliomas (Table 1).
Table 1

Imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis of cardiac masses on the basis of two-dimensional echocardiography and CMR

Cardiac massTwo-dimensional echocardiographyEchocardiographic contrast imagingCine CMRT1-weighted imagingT1-weighted imaging, fat suppressionT2-weighted imagingT2-weighted imaging, fat suppressionLGE CMR (after contrast enhancement)
Pseudotumor
 Pericardial cystEcholucent mass adjoining the cardiac border, frequently septatedNo enhancementEncapsulated fluid-filled structure that generally is directly attached to the pericardium but rarely can be attached by a peduncle; usually located in the right pericardiophrenic angleLowLowHighHighNo uptake
 ThrombusVaries from a small, immobile mural mass to a large protruding mobile mass; may be homogeneously echogenic or may have heterogeneous texture with lucent areasNo enhancementIsointense/hypointense mass (if recent thrombus), typically located in the LA and less often in the LV; most often localized near a wall motion abnormality or in the left atrial appendageLow (if recent, high)Low (if recent, high)Low (if recent, high)Low (if recent, high)No uptake
Benign mass
 MyxomaHeterogeneous mobile mass pedunculated on a fibrovascular stalk (polypoid, papillary), in the region of the fossa ovalisPartially enhancedHypointense, highly mobile, occasionally prolapsing through the mitral valveIsointenseIsointenseHighHighHeterogeneous
 FibromaDistinct, well-demarcated, noncontractile and solid, highly echogenic mass mainly in the LVNo enhancementIsointense/hypointense, solitary, well-defined, noncontractile mass that often narrows the ventricular cavityIsointenseIsointenseLowLowHyperenhancement
 LipomaHomogeneous, broad-based, immobile, without a pedicle and encapsulated; most often small in sizeNo enhancementArise from the epicardium or endocardium; when originates from the endocardium, it manifests decreased mobility and a broad base of attachmentHighLowHighLowNo uptake
 LASHFatty infiltration of the proximal and distal portions of the atrial septum, generally with sparing of the fossa ovalis, without a stalk and most commonly seen in the elderly and obeseNo enhancementNonencapsulated, immobile, hyperintense mass, without stalk; septal thickening >2 cm, sparing the fossa ovalis membrane (dumbbell shape)HighLowHighLowNo uptake
 RhabdomyomaSmall, well-circumscribed (multiple) nodules or a pedunculated mass in LV or RV, especially in infants and childrenNo enhancementArise intramurally in the ventricular myocardium and unlike fibromas, they are multiple in 90% of cases; they are well circumscribed and vary from a few millimeters to a few centimeters in sizeIsointenseIsointenseIsointense/highIsointense/highNo/minimal uptake
Malignant mass
 AngiosarcomaLobulated masses, distinctly heterogeneous with an area of necrosis or hemorrhage; they have no stalk, differentiating them from myxomas or papillary fibroelastomas; typically in the RA and RVHyperenhancementIsointense (heterogeneous), large right atrial mass with or without pericardial involvementHeterogeneousHeterogeneousHeterogeneousHeterogeneousHeterogeneous
 RhabdomyosarcomaArise from any cardiac structure, initially invade the pericardiumHyperenhancementIsointense mass, involves multiple sites within the heart, including the valvesIsointenseIsointenseHyperintenseHyperintenseHomogeneous
 Sarcoma (undifferentiated)Broad-based mass, typically in the LA (differential diagnosis is a myxoma) with heterogeneous echogenicityHyperenhancementIsointense (heterogeneous) mass, most often in the LAIsointenseIsointenseHyperintenseHyperintenseHeterogeneous
 LymphomaHomogeneous, infiltrating masses leading to wall thickening or as nodular masses intruding into the heart chambers, especially the RAHyperenhancementIsointense mass, most often in the RA accompanied by pericardial effusionIsointenseIsointenseIsointenseIsointenseNo/minimal uptake
 Metastatic massThe pericardium is more frequently involved with metastases and typically presents with a pericardial effusionHyperenhancementThe most common site of involvement is the pericardiumLowLowHighHighHeterogeneous

LA, Left atrium; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

T1- and T2-weighted imaging signal intensity is relative to myocardium.

Metastatic melanoma has a high T1-weighted and a low T2-weighted signal intensity.

Imaging characteristics and differential diagnosis of cardiac masses on the basis of two-dimensional echocardiography and CMR LA, Left atrium; LGE, late gadolinium enhancement; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle. T1- and T2-weighted imaging signal intensity is relative to myocardium. Metastatic melanoma has a high T1-weighted and a low T2-weighted signal intensity. A number of imaging modalities, including echocardiography, computed tomography, and CMR have been used for the diagnosis of LASH. Two-dimensional TTE and TEE are the diagnostic modalities of choice because these modalities are widely available, the cost per examination is low, and side effects are infrequent. In clinical practice, an echocardiographer examining a patient with a “cardiac mass” should take into consideration the patient's age and medical history, as well as the localization and echocardiographic characteristics of the lesion. In our case, the patient was elderly and obese, and TTE revealed hypertrophy of the proximal and distal portions of the atrial septum with sparing of the fossa ovalis (dumbbell shape). The aforementioned characteristic appearance and location of LASH aids in echocardiographic differentiation from cardiac tumors and makes its diagnosis probable. Notably, among the most likely alternative diagnoses are myxomas and lipomas. However, myxomas originate from the interatrial septum near the fossa ovalis and usually have a stalk, whereas lipomas are encapsulated. Echocardiographic contrast agents may assist in detecting an intracardiac mass and characterizing it further on the basis of the extent of contrast enhancement, which is a marker of vascularity. For example, malignant and highly vascular tumors manifest hyperenhancement with contrast, thrombi exhibit no enhancement at all, and myxomas show partial enhancement. The role of three-dimensional TTE and TEE for the diagnosis of LASH is promising. Computed tomography can be helpful for the differential diagnosis of LASH from malignancies, because of their different relative densities. In particular, LASH has the pathognomonic attenuation coefficient of adipose tissue, which is absent in neoplasms. The role of CMR is crucial in determining the borders of LASH and the extension into the interventricular septum and the ventricular free wall. Furthermore, it can provide valuable information regarding lesion composition (fat, solid, cystic or fibrous tissue). Regarding localization, morphology, and signal intensity, the CMR features suggesting a malignant nature of a mass are invasion of extracardiac structures, involvement of more than one cardiac chamber, involvement of the right side of the heart, tissue inhomogeneity, poor definition of borders, lesion diameter > 5 cm, and the presence of pericardial or pleural effusion. The performance of a perfusion study during contrast agent injection assists in the confirmation of the diagnosis of malignancy and improved characterization of its nature. LASH can sometimes be confused with lipomas because of similar signal characteristics on CMR. Differential diagnosis is based on fat extension (>2 cm) in transverse diameter, the involvement of the limbus of the fossa ovalis, and sparing of the fossa ovalis membrane, which are unique morphologic features of LASH. Our case shows the importance of a multimodality approach in patients with LASH. Bedside TTE revealed a lesion in the interatrial septum extending to both the left and right atria, making the diagnosis of LASH probable. CMR revealed the presence of fatty tissue in the interatrial septum with the characteristic “dumbbell” shape and confirmed the diagnosis. Electrocardiography depicted frequent premature atrial contractions, which were the reason for 24-hour Holter monitoring and the report of the episodes of atrial fibrillation. Although there are situations in which each imaging modality (TTE, TEE, computed tomography, and CMR) can individually establish the diagnosis of LASH, not infrequently the diagnosis is based on a combination of echocardiography and computed tomography or CMR,14, 15 as in our case. Bearing in mind the increasing life expectancy of the general population, evolution of noninvasive imaging techniques, and the rising prevalence of obesity, the diagnosis of LASH is becoming more probable.

Conclusion

LASH is a benign lesion of the interatrial septum, often asymptomatic. The role of multimodality imaging techniques in the diagnosis of LASH is pivotal. Making a correct and timely diagnosis prevents the patient from undergoing unnecessary examinations with probable financial, social, and psychological consequences, because in most cases of LASH, the only therapeutic strategy consists of patient reassurance and regular follow-up.
  15 in total

1.  CMR in the assessment of cardiac masses: primary malignant tumors.

Authors:  Antonio Esposito; Francesco De Cobelli; Gabriele Ironi; Paolo Marra; Tamara Canu; Renata Mellone; Alessandro Del Maschio
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-10

2.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of interatrial septum.

Authors:  Konstantinos M Lampropoulos; Dimitrios Kotsas; Themistoklis Iliopoulos
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-21

3.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the atrial septum: diagnosis by combined echocardiography and computerized tomography.

Authors:  M Simons; H S Cabin; C C Jaffe
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1984-08-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  MR imaging of cardiac tumors and masses: a review of methods and clinical applications.

Authors:  Manish Motwani; Ananth Kidambi; Bernhard A Herzog; Akhlaque Uddin; John P Greenwood; Sven Plein
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: indication for surgery?

Authors:  C J Zeebregts; A G Hensens; J Timmermans; M S Pruszczynski; L K Lacquet
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.191

6.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: a prospective study of incidence, imaging findings, and clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Christoph M Heyer; Thomas Kagel; Stefan P Lemburg; Torsten T Bauer; Volkmar Nicolas
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum presenting as an obstructive right atrial mass in a patient with exertional dyspnea.

Authors:  Aylin Tugcu; Ozlem Yildirimturk; Emine Rizaoglu; Ertain Sagbas; Ertan Sagbas; Belhhan Akpinar; Belhhan Polat; Saide Aytekin
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 8.  Lipomatous Atrial Septal Hypertrophy: A Review of Its Anatomy, Pathophysiology, Multimodality Imaging, and Relevance to Percutaneous Interventions.

Authors:  Diana M Laura; Robert Donnino; Eugene E Kim; Ricardo Benenstein; Robin S Freedberg; Muhamed Saric
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.251

9.  Lipomatous hypertrophy of the interatrial septum: in vivo diagnosis.

Authors:  J M Isner; C S Swan; J P Mikus; B L Carter
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 10.  Cardiac tumors: echo assessment.

Authors:  Rekha Mankad; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Echo Res Pract       Date:  2016-09-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does Anyone Remember "Fingerprints on an X-ray?"

Authors:  Vincent L Sorrell
Journal:  CASE (Phila)       Date:  2021-12-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.