| Literature DB >> 30062195 |
Jose L Navia1, Samir Kapadia2, Haytham Elgharably1, Gabriel Maluenda3, Krzysztof Bartuś4, Cristian Baeza3, Rajesh K Nair5, Josep Rodés-Cabau6, Cesare Beghi7, Rodolfo C Quijano8.
Abstract
Patients with isolated functional or recurrent tricuspid regurgitation are often denied surgery because they are considered to be at high risk. Transcatheter valve therapy provides a less invasive alternative for tricuspid regurgitation associated with right heart failure. We have evaluated the feasibility of transcatheter tricuspid valve implantation of the NaviGate valved stent in a long-term swine model. The valved stent was successfully implanted through transjugular and transatrial approaches on the beating heart with excellent hemodynamic and valve performance. No conduction disturbance or coronary obstruction was observed. This technology could provide an alternative treatment for patients who are at high surgical risk with severe tricuspid regurgitation and compromised right ventricular function.Entities:
Keywords: ICE, intracardiac echocardiography; NaviGate bioprosthesis; PVL, paravalvular leak; RA, right atrium; RHF, right heart failure; RV, right ventricle/ventricular; RVOT, right ventricle outflow; TA, tricuspid annulus; TR, tricuspid regurgitation; TV, tricuspid valve; preclinical model; transcatheter replacement; tricuspid valve
Year: 2018 PMID: 30062195 PMCID: PMC6058955 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2017.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci ISSN: 2452-302X
Figure 1The NaviGate Valved-Stent
(A) Stent. (B) Inflow (left atrial) view. (C) Outflow (left ventricle) view. (D) Side view.
Figure 2Transatrial Tricuspid Valved Stent Delivery System
(A) Illustrated design of the transatrial delivery system. (B) Lateral view of the transatrial delivery system.
Figure 3Transjugular Tricuspid Valved Stent Delivery System
(A) The delivery system distal capsule extended. (B) The delivery system distal capsule articulated 90°.
Model Information for Transjugular Implant in a Long-Term Animal Study
| Animal model | Swine, 85–90 kg |
| Access site for transjugular | Percutaneous right jugular vein access—sutureless implantation technique without cardiopulmonary bypass |
| Delivery system | Size 30-F outer diameter |
| Devices | NaviGate valved-stent, 30-mm inflow and 40-mm outflow, 12 tines in inflow and outflow |
| Implantation interval | Chronic long term (≥25 days) |
| Number of animals | 6 transjugular |
Model Information for Transatrial Implant in a Long-Term Animal Study
| Animal model | Swine, 95–105 kg |
| Access site for transatrial | Through a mini-thoracotomy RA access—sutureless implantation technique without cardiopulmonary bypass |
| Delivery system | Size 30-F outer diameter |
| Devices | NaviGate valved-stent, 30-mm inflow and 4-mm outflow, 12 tines in inflow and outflow |
| Implantation interval | Chronic long term (≥25 days) |
| Number of animals | 6 transatrial |
Figure 4Fluoroscopy: Transatrial Tricuspid Valved Stent Implant
(A) Positioning of the valved stent in the tricuspid annulus plane. (B) Slow release of the valved stent. (C) Full implantation in the tricuspid annulus.
Figure 5Echocardiography: Transatrial Tricuspid Valved Stent Implantation
(A and B) Echocardiographic short-axis view. (C and D) Echocardiographic long-axis view.
Chronic Long-Term Tricuspid Valve Study
| Sex, Body Weight (kg) | Model # | Ice C-C Dimension (cm) | Blood Loss (ml) | Time for Implant (min) | ΔPp mm Hg (peak) | ΔPm mm Hg (mean) | RVOT Velocity (m/s) | RVOT Gradient (mean/mm Hg) | Leakage | Duration (days) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F, 105 TA | X27 | 3.59 | 250 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 4.0 | 0.49 | 1.1 | Mild central | 30 |
| F, 104 TA | X27 | 3.93 | 400 | 12 | 6.0 | 2.5 | 0.47 | 1.2 | No | 150 |
| M, 98 TA | X27 | 3.93 | 300 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 0.45 | 1.8 | No | 150 |
| F, 100 TA | X27 | 3.92 | 350 | 7.0 | 5.4 | 1.7 | 0.48 | 0.9 | No | ≥150/alive |
| F, 96 TA | X27 | 4.55 | 1,000 | EUTH | EUTH | — | — | — | TVD | 0.3 |
| F, 95 TA | X27 | 4.42 | 150 | 6.0 | 5.0 | 3.1 | 0.35 | 1.5 | No | ≥150/alive |
| M, 85 TJ | X27 | 4.00 | 50 | 15 | 6.0 | 2.8 | 0.50 | 2.0 | Mild PVL | 210 |
| M, 88 TJ | X27 | 3.70 | 100 | 12 | 5.4 | 2.0 | 0.41 | 1.8 | No | 210 |
| F, 90 TJ | X27 | 4.12 | 50 | 17 | 6.4 | 3.2 | 0.52 | 1.6 | No | ≥120/alive |
| F, 85 TJ | X27 | 3.93 | 75 | 18 | 4.8 | 2.5 | 0.44 | 2.1 | Mod PVL | ≥120/alive |
| M, 89 TJ | X27 | 4.10 | 85 | 15 | 5.0 | 2.7 | 0.53 | 2.2 | No | ≥90/alive |
| M, 90 TJ | X27 | 3.88 | 90 | 13 | 4.7 | 2.2 | 0.49 | 1.9 | No | ≥90/alive |
C-C = commissure-to-commissure; EUTH = euthanasia; ICE = intra-cardiac echocardiography; Pm mmHg = mean pressure gradient across the valved stent; Pp mmHg = peak pressure gradient across the valved stent; PVL = paravalvular leak; RVOT = right ventricular outflow tract; TA = transatrial; TJ = transjugular; TVD = total valve dislodgement.
Figure 6Fluoroscopy: Transjagular Tricuspid Valved Stent Implantation
(A and B) Fluoroscopy: transjugular tricuspid valved stent. (C) Right ventricle angiogram.
Figure 7Echocardiography: Transjagular Tricuspid Valved Stent Implantation
(A and B) Echocardiographic short-axis view. (C and D) Echocardiographic long-axis view.
Figure 8Pathology