| Literature DB >> 30061759 |
Hilada Nefic1, Mirela Mackic-Djurovic2, Izet Eminovic1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The gene for 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (NAD(P)H) or MTHFR gene encodes protein methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR), an enzyme important in folate metabolism. AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the frequencies of 677C>T and 1298A>C polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene of healthy subjects from the population.Entities:
Keywords: 1298A>C; 677C>T; MTHFR gene; PCR-RFLP; SNPs; polymorphisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30061759 PMCID: PMC6021155 DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2018.72.164-169
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Arch ISSN: 0350-199X
Genotype and allele frequencies of MTHFR gene polymorphisms in the population. *Statistically significant.
| MTHFR 677C>T polymorphism | MTHFR 1298A>C polymorphism | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype/Allele | Total n (%) | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | χ2 test | Genotype/Allele | Total n (%) | Male n (%) | Female n (%) | χ2 test | |
| Sample size | 164 (100) | 66 (100) | 98 (100) | 164 (100) | 66 (100) | 98 (100) | ||||
| Age (mean ± SD) | 34.85±14.58 | 34.59±15.10 | 35.03±14.30 | 34.85±14.58 | 34.59±15.10 | 35.03±14.30 | ||||
| Genotype frequency | CC | 67 (40.85) | 28 (42.42) | 39 (39.8) | χ2 = 1.817 P = 0.4030 | AA | 44 (26.83) | 19 (28.79) | 25 (25.51) | χ2 = 2.202 P = 0.3325 |
| CT | 87 (53.05) | 36 (54.55) | 51 (52.04) | AC | 114 (69.51) | 43 (65.15) | 71 (72.45) | |||
| TT | 10 (6.1) | 2 (3.03) | 8 (8.16) | CC | 6 (3.66) | 4 (6.06) | 2 (2.04) | |||
| HWE | χ2 | 7.01022 | 0.08635 | 2.40155 | χ2 | 36.0918 | 9.23188 | 27.88707 | ||
| P value | 0.00810* | 0.76885 | 0.12121 | P value | 0.00000* | 0.00237* | 0.00000* | |||
| Allele frequency | C | 221 (67.38) | 92 (69.7) | 129 (65.82) | χ2 = 0.378 P = 0.5385 | A | 202 (61.59) | 81 (61.36) | 121 (61.73) | χ2 = 0.00230 P = 0.9617 |
| T | 107 (32.62) | 40 (30.3) | 67 (34.18) | C | 126 (38.41) | 51 (38.64) | 75 (38.27) | |||
| Total | 328 (100) | 132 (100) | 196 (100) | Total | 328 (100) | 132 (100) | 196 (100) | |||
Distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies of 677C>T MTHFR gene observed in this study compared with those found in other populations. *Statistically significant.
| Sample size (n) | Distribution of 677C>T MTHFR genotype (n) | HWE | Frequency of 677C>T MTHFR alleles | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Country | CC | CT | TT | P | T, n (%) | 95% CI | χ2 | P | |
| Present study | 164 | 67 | 87 | 10 | 0.008* | 107 (32.62) | ||||
| Biseli et al, 2008 ( | Brazil | 194 | 100 | 77 | 17 | 0.69 | 111 (28.61) | -2.941% - 10.98% | 1.167 | P = 0.2800 |
| Boduroglu et al, 2004 ( | Turkey | 91 | 58 | 30 | 3 | 0.71 | 36 (19.78) | 4.58% - 20.542% | 8.939 | P = 0.0028* |
| Balta et al, 2003 ( | Turkey | 185 | 90 | 87 | 8 | 0.02* | 103 (27.84) | -2.233% - 11.789% | 1.668 | P = 0.1965 |
| Basol et al, 2016 ( | Turkey | 126 | 86 | 35 | 5 | 0.55 | 45 (17.86) | 7.442% - 21.779% | 15.300 | P = 0.0001* |
| Thirumaran et al, 2005 ( | Germany | 1448 | 600 | 681 | 167 | 0.21 | 1015 (35.05) | -3.211% - 7.78% | 0.663 | P = 0.4154 |
| Kurzwelly, 2010 ( | Germany | 212 | 96 | 96 | 20 | 0.57 | 136 (32.08) | -6.341% - 7.494% | 0.00615 | P = 0.9375 |
| Lightfoot et al, 2005 ( | UK | 755 | 356 | 316 | 83 | 0.31 | 482 (31.92) | -4.898% - 6.557% | 0.0327 | P = 0.8564 |
| Chango et al, 2005 ( | France | 119 | 49 | 58 | 12 | 0.39 | 82 (34.45) | -6.234% - 9.991% | 0.134 | P = 0.7148 |
| Coppede et al, 2009 ( | Italy | 113 | 40 | 55 | 18 | 0.90 | 91 (40.26) | -0.75% - 16.036% | 3.076 | P = 0.0794 |
| Kokotas et al, 2009 ( | Denmark | 1084 | 545 | 449 | 90 | 0.85 | 629 (29.01) | -1.806% - 9.304% | 1.616 | P = 0.2036 |
| Martinez-Friaz, 2008 ( | Spain | 188 | 76 | 85 | 27 | 0.68 | 139 (36.97) | -2.912% - 11.526% | 1.273 | P = 0.2592 |
| Meguid et al, 2008 ( | Egypt | 48 | 33 | 12 | 3 | 0.21 | 18 (18.75) | 3.328% - 22.884% | 6.221 | P = 0.0126* |
| O’Leary et al, 2002 ( | Ireland | 192 | 90 | 84 | 18 | 0.80 | 120 (31.25) | -5.664% - 8.442% | 0.0963 | P = 0.7563 |
| Wang et al, 2008 ( | China | 70 | 36 | 29 | 5 | 0.79 | 39 (27.86) | -4.871% - 13.771% | 0.826 | P = 0.3635 |
| Muthuswamy et al, 2016 ( | India | 110 | 80 | 30 | 0 | 0.09 | 30 (13.64) | 11.693% - 25.821% | 24.297 | P < 0.0001* |
| Jusić-Karić et al, 2016 ( | BiH | 207 | 91 | 92 | 24 | 0.92 | 140 (33.82) | -5.834% - 8.153% | 0.0708 | P = 0.7902 |
| Mahmutbegović et al, 2017 ( | BiH | 154 | 71 | 74 | 9 | 0.07 | 92 (29.87) | -4.679% - 10.124% | 0.438 | P = 0.5080 |
| Damnjanovic et al, 2010 ( | Serbia | 412 | 163 | 190 | 59 | 0.76 | 308 (37.38) | -1.547% - 10.849% | 2.105 | P = 0.1469 |
| Alfirevic et al. 2010 ( | Croatia | 104 | 37 | 59 | 8 | 0.02* | 75 (36.06) | -5.008% - 12.013% | 0.527 | P = 0.4679 |
| Petra et al, 2007 ( | Slovenia | 258 | 112 | 110 | 36 | 0.29 | 182 (35.27) | -4.118% - 9.278% | 0.513 | P = 0.4737 |
| Li et al, 2013 ( | USA | 564 | 236 | 246 | 82 | 0.17 | 410 (36.35) | -2.329% - 9.544% | 1.385 | P = 0.2392 |
| Lincz et al, 2003 ( | Australia | 299 | 145 | 133 | 21 | 0.19 | 175 (29.26) | -2.975% - 9.833% | 0.976 | P = 0.3232 |
Distribution of genotypes and allele frequencies of 1298A>C MTHFR gene observed in this study compared with those found in other populations. *Statistically significant.
| Sample size (n) | Distribution of 1298A>C MTHFR genotype (n) | HWE | Frequency of 1298A>C MTHFR alleles | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Country | AA | AC | CC | P | C, n (%) | 95% CI | χ2 | P | |
| Present study | 164 | 44 | 114 | 6 | 0.00* | 126 (38.41) | ||||
| Biseli et al, 2008 ( | Brazil | 194 | 108 | 74 | 12 | 0.89 | 98 (25.26) | 6.119% - 20.102% | 13.692 | P = 0.0002* |
| Boduroglu et al, 2004 ( | Turkey | 91 | 21 | 60 | 10 | 0.00* | 80 (43.96) | -3.618% - 14.756% | 1.276 | P = 0.2587 |
| Basol et al, 2016 ( | Turkey | 126 | 74 | 48 | 4 | 0.25 | 56 (22.22) | 8.455% - 23.609% | 16.605 | P < 0.0001* |
| Niclot et al, 2006 ( | France | 198 | 102 | 81 | 15 | 0.84 | 111 (28.03) | 3.301% - 17.407% | 8.314 | P = 0.0039* |
| Gemmati et al, 2004 ( | Italy | 257 | 126 | 110 | 21 | 0.66 | 152 (29.57) | 2.115% - 15.593% | 6.681 | P = 0.0097* |
| De Re et al, 2010 ( | Italy | 96 | 33 | 54 | 9 | 0.05* | 72 (37.50) | -8.072% - 9.709% | 0.0127 | P = 0.9103 |
| Martinez-Friaz, 2008 ( | Spain | 188 | 91 | 78 | 19 | 0.70 | 116 (30.85) | 0.322% - 14.754% | 4.110 | P = 0.0426* |
| Meguid et al, 2008 ( | Egypt | 48 | 18 | 29 | 1 | 0.00* | 31 (32.29) | -5.472% - 16.829% | 0.945 | P = 0.3310 |
| Muthuswamy et al, 2016 ( | India | 110 | 53 | 50 | 7 | 0.28 | 64 (29.09) | 0.952% - 17.394% | 4.647 | P = 0.0311* |
| Berglund et al, 2009 ( | Sweden | 449 | 214 | 196 | 39 | 0.53 | 274 (30.51) | 1.754% - 14.166% | 6.467 | P = 0.0110* |
| Kim et al, 2005 ( | South Korea | 445 | 308 | 129 | 8 | 0.19 | 145 (16.29) | 16.228% - 28.109% | 66.523 | P < 0.0001* |
| Kurzwelly, 2010 ( | German y | 212 | 106 | 89 | 17 | 0.78 | 123 (29.01) | 2.407% - 16.369% | 6.960 | P = 0.0083* |
| Weiner, 2011 ( | Russia | 503 | 232 | 215 | 56 | 0.56 | 327 (32.50) | -0.168% - 12.124% | 3.594 | P = 0.0580 |
| Li et al, 2013 ( | USA | 574 | 265 | 250 | 59 | 0.99 | 368 (32.06) | 0.371% - 12.476% | 4.339 | P = 0.0373* |
| Lincz et al, 2003 ( | Australia | 294 | 124 | 139 | 31 | 0.38 | 201 (34.18) | -2.397% - 10.934% | 1.462 | P = 0.2266 |
| Lightfoot et al, 2005 ( | UK | 755 | 347 | 331 | 77 | 0.88 | 485 (32.12) | 0.472% - 12.273% | 4.525 | P = 0.0334* |