| Literature DB >> 30061502 |
Yangyang Zheng1, Xudong Wang2, Siyuan Liu3, Kewei Zhang4, Zhibo Cai5, Xiuling Chen6, Yao Zhang7, Jiayin Liu8, Aoxue Wang9,10.
Abstract
To investigate whether the ech42 gene in Clonostachysrosea can improve the biocontrol efficacy of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and its molecular mechanism. Compared to the wild type, the B. amyloliquefaciens transformed with the ech42 gene exhibited higher chitinase activity. The B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 also showed significantly higher biocontrol efficiency compared to Botrytiscinerea when tomato plants were pre-treated with B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42. No significant difference in biocontrol efficiency was observed between the wild type and B.amyloliquefaciens-ech42 when tomato plants were first infected by Botrytiscinerea. In addition, the activity of the defense-related enzyme polyphenol oxidase, but not superoxide dismutase, was significantly higher in B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 than in the wild type. The ech42 enhances the biocontrol efficiency of B.amyloliquefaciens by increasing the capacity of preventative/curative effects in plants, rather than by killing the pathogens.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; biological control; chitinase; defense enzymes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30061502 PMCID: PMC6121428 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1ech42 protein expression analysis of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42. (a) SDS-PAGE showing the ech42 protein from B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42. M. Protein Marker; (1) B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 induced by IPTG; (2) B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 without IPTG induction; (3) B. amyloliquefaciens induced by IPTG; (4) B. amyloliquefaciens without IPTG induction; (b) Comparison of chitinase activities of B. amyloliquefaciens and B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42.
Figure 2The biocontrol efficiency of B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 against Botrytiscinerea on tomato plants. The prevention experiment (a,b): (a) Representative images of tomato plants treated with wild type B. amyloliquefaciens (WT), B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 (ech42) or non-treated (control); (b) disease indexs in the prevention experiment at 15 and 20 days. The treatment experiment (c,d): (c) Representative images of tomato plants treated with wild type B. amyloliquefaciens (WT), B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42 (ech42) or non-treated (control); (d) disease index in the treatment experiment at 15 and 20 days. Differences between the treatment and control were analyzed using ANOVA and significant results are indicated by ** (p < 0.01).
Figure 3Changes of PPO (a,c) and SOD (b,d) activities during prevention (a,b) and treatment (c,d) experiments against Botrytiscinerea on tomato plants. WT: B. amyloliquefaciens; ech42: B. amyloliquefaciens-ech42; control: not treated with either WT or ech42. “*”: indicates statistically significant results.