| Literature DB >> 30061387 |
Anne Louise Hansen1, Gregory J Buchan2, Michael Rühl3, Kojiro Mukai4, Sonia R Salvatore2, Emari Ogawa4, Sidsel D Andersen1, Marie B Iversen1, Anne L Thielke1, Camilla Gunderstofte1, Mona Motwani5, Charlotte T Møller1, Andreas S Jakobsen1, Katherine A Fitzgerald5, Jessica Roos6, Rongtuan Lin7, Thorsten J Maier1,6, Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky8, Cathrine A Miner9, Wei Qian9, Jonathan J Miner9,10,11, Rachel E Rigby12, Jan Rehwinkel12, Martin R Jakobsen1, Hiroyuki Arai4,13, Tomohiko Taguchi4,14,15, Francisco J Schopfer2, David Olagnier1, Christian K Holm16.
Abstract
The adaptor molecule stimulator of IFN genes (STING) is central to production of type I IFNs in response to infection with DNA viruses and to presence of host DNA in the cytosol. Excessive release of type I IFNs through STING-dependent mechanisms has emerged as a central driver of several interferonopathies, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Aicardi-Goutières syndrome (AGS), and stimulator of IFN genes-associated vasculopathy with onset in infancy (SAVI). The involvement of STING in these diseases points to an unmet need for the development of agents that inhibit STING signaling. Here, we report that endogenously formed nitro-fatty acids can covalently modify STING by nitro-alkylation. These nitro-alkylations inhibit STING palmitoylation, STING signaling, and subsequently, the release of type I IFN in both human and murine cells. Furthermore, treatment with nitro-fatty acids was sufficient to inhibit production of type I IFN in fibroblasts derived from SAVI patients with a gain-of-function mutation in STING. In conclusion, we have identified nitro-fatty acids as endogenously formed inhibitors of STING signaling and propose for these lipids to be considered in the treatment of STING-dependent inflammatory diseases.Entities:
Keywords: IFN; SAVI; STING; nitro-fatty acids; palmitoylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30061387 PMCID: PMC6099880 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1806239115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.NO2-FAs are formed after HSV-2 infection. (A) Schematic of the formation of NO2-FAs induced by iNOS/NOX production of NO species during virus infection. (B) Plasma and (C) vaginal lavages after inoculation with cLA (1 mM) in the vaginal lumen from WT and Nos2 C57BL/6 mice infected intravaginally with HSV-2 (6.7 × 104 pfu per mouse) were harvested at day 2 postinfection and analyzed for NO2-cLA formation by mass spectrometry. One representative experiment of two independent experiments is shown. Data are represented as box/whiskers with (B) n = 7 mice per group and (C) n = 8 (untreated) or 12 (HSV-2 infected) mice per group. ns, Not significant. *P < 0.05 (unpaired Mann–Whitney U test). (D) RAW264.7 (WT) cells, (E) RAW264.7 control cells (empty vector) or RAW264.7 cells with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of Nos2 expression, and (F) BMMs from WT or Nos2 mice were stimulated with combinations of IFN-γ (10 ng/mL), LPS (1 µg/mL), and HSV-2 (MOI 0.5) in the presence of cLA (100 µM). After 20 h of stimulation, supernatants were analyzed for NO2-cLA formation by mass spectrometry. (D–F) Data represent three biological replicates in one experiment and are displayed as mean ± SEM. (G) Representative chromatogram showing coelution between samples (LPS + IFN-γ, HSV-2 + IFN-γ, and HSV-2) and standard, confirming the presence of NO2-cLA.
Fig. 2.NO2-FAs suppress STING signaling and release of type I IFN. (A and B) THP-1 cells and (C and D) BMMs (WT mice) were treated with indicated NO2-FAs (5–10 µM) or OA/LA (10 µM) 15 min before stimulation with dsDNA (4 µg/mL) or infection with HSV-2 (MOI 1) or left untreated (Ut). After 20 h, supernatants were harvested and analyzed for type I IFN. Data represent one of two independent experiments and are presented as mean ± SEM. (E–G) THP-1 cells were treated with NO2-FAs (10 µM) or OA/LA (10 µM) 15 min before stimulation with cGAMP (4 µg/mL) or dsDNA (4 µg/mL) using Lipofectamine2000 (Lipo). After 3 h, lysates were separated by SDS/PAGE, and indicated proteins were detected by Western blotting using specific antibodies. STING and IRF3 dimers were detected using nondenaturing and nonreducing conditions. Vinculin was used as loading control.
Fig. 3.NO2-FAs directly modify STING to inhibit palmitoylation. (A) THP-1 cells with endogenous STING and (B) HEK293T cells transfected with expression plasmid for human STING plasmid (Flag tagged) were treated with biotinylated 10-NO2-OA (10 μM) or biotinylated OA (10 μM). After 1.5-h incubation, lysates were precipitated using mixed magnetic Streptavidin beads. Eluates and input samples were separated by SDS/PAGE, and STING (α-Flag) was detected by Western blotting. Blots represent representative results from two independent experiments. (C) HEK293T cells transfected with an expression plasmid for human STING were treated with 10-NO2-OA (10 µM). After 1.5 h, STING was precipitated using STING-specific antibody and analyzed for nitro-alkylation by mass spectrometry. Graphics display (Left) an example spectrum of STING digest: Upper Left in black shows NO2-OA–treated STING, and Lower Left in red shows untreated STING as a comparison. r.int (%), relative intensity in %. (Upper Right) List of matched peptides. (Lower Right) STING amino acid sequence with peptides containing nitro-alkylation marked in yellow. Data are displayed from a single experiment. (D) Graphic illustration of the positions of nitro-alkylated STING residues. (E) Immortalized STING-KO MEFs expressing GFP-tagged STING were treated with 10-NO2-OA (10 µM), OA (10 µM), 2-bromopalmitate, 2-BP (50 µM), or vehicle control for 1 h. Cells were washed and incubated with radio-labeled palmitate (3H-palmitate) for 1 h before stimulation with DMXAA (25 mg/mL) or with vehicle control for an additional 1 h. Cells were lysed, and STING was precipitated (IP) using GFP-specific antibodies. Eluate and input were separated by SDS/PAGE and analyzed for contents of radio-labeled palmitate by autoradiography. STING was detected by immunoblotting, and α-tubulin was used as a loading control. Data displayed are from one of three independent experiments with same result. (F) Immortalized STING-KO MEFs expressing GFP-tagged STING were treated with 10-NO2-OA (10 µM), OA (10 µM), or vehicle control as indicated before stimulation with DMXAA (25 mg/mL) or was left untreated (Ut) for 1 h. Cells that already express STING-GFP (green in merged panels) were fixed and stained for the TGN marker TGN38 (purple in merged panels) or pTBK1 (purple in merged panels), and the nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue in merged panels) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. The first three columns represent single stains of EGFP-STING, TGN38, and pTBK1, respectively. The last two columns represent merged pictures of EGFP-STING together with TGN38 and EGFP-STING together with pTBK1, respectively. Insets illustrate close-ups. Data represent two independent experiments.
Fig. 4.NO2-FAs inhibit release of type I IFN from SAVI fibroblasts. (A–C) Immortalized fibroblasts derived from three different SAVI patients were treated with indicated NO2-FAs (5–10 µM) or OA/LA (10 µM) 15 min before stimulation with dsDNA (4 µg/mL). After 20 h, supernatants were harvested and analyzed for type I IFN. Data represent three biological replicates in one experiment of each donor and are displayed as mean ± SEM. (D) Immortalized fibroblasts from one SAVI patient (Pt #1) were treated with indicated NO2-FAs (10 µM) or OA (10 µM) 15 min before stimulation with cGAMP (4 µg/mL). After 3 h, lysates were separated by SDS/PAGE, and indicated proteins were detected by Western blotting using specific antibodies. Vinculin was used as loading control. Data represent one experiment with one donor. (E) HEK293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids for WT STING, for three known gain-of-function STING mutations (V175L, N154S, V155M), or for no plasmid (−). Cells were treated with indicated 10-NO2-OA (2.5–10 µM). Induction of IFN was assessed using the ISRE luciferase assay. Data are representative of two independent experiments and are displayed as means ± SEM. (F) Graphical abstract depicting how nitro-alkylation affects STING function. Modified from ref. 18.