Literature DB >> 3006122

Cholangiocarcinoma: imaging by MR.

G C Dooms, R K Kerlan, H Hricak, S D Wall, A R Margulis.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) images and computed tomographic (CT) scans of nine patients with histologically proved cholangiocarcinoma were compared retrospectively to assess the potential of MR imaging in the detection and staging of the disease. Cholangiocarcinomas were demonstrated as soft-tissue masses by both techniques in seven of the nine patients. In three patients, the masses were more apparent with MR because of a greater degree of contrast between the tumor and the surrounding tissues. In all four patients with the scirrhous subtype of cholangiocarcinoma, the soft-tissue masses showed decreased signal intensity on the second spin-echo image (echo time = 56 msec). Displacement or encasement of the adjacent vessels was well demonstrated by MR. Distal extension of the tumor (hepatic metastases, regional lymphadenopathy) appeared on both MR images and CT scans but was more apparent with MR. Both MR and CT demonstrated intrahepatic bile duct dilatation, but CT demonstrated it more readily. MR appears to be an effective modality for the detection and staging of cholangiocarcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3006122     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.159.1.3006122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  MR imaging and MR cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings.

Authors:  Gabriele Masselli; Riccardo Manfredi; Amorino Vecchioli; Gianfranco Gualdi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Diagnosis of biliary tract carcinoma].

Authors:  U Weickert; R Jakobs; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Radiologically identifiable intratumoral portal vein in intrahepatic cholangiomas: a diagnostic pitfall.

Authors:  K Kaneko; H Honda; K Kajiyama; Y Yokomizo; N Hashiguchi; T Fukuya; Y Tateshi; T Ro; K Masuda
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct

4.  Ultrasound, CT, and MRI comparison in primary and secondary tumors of the liver.

Authors:  W L Curati; A Halevy; R N Gibson; D H Carr; L H Blumgart; R E Steiner
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1988

5.  Bile duct disease: prospective comparison of ERCP, CT, and fat suppression MRI.

Authors:  R C Semelka; J P Shoenut; M A Kroeker; H Hricak; G Y Minuk; C S Yaffe; A B Micflikier
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

6.  Bile duct involvement in hepatocellular carcinoma: MR demonstration.

Authors:  P Soyer; J P Laissy; D A Bluemke; A Sibert; Y Menu
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Katrina A Vanderveen; Hero K Hussain
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Cholangiography: Practical Tips and Clinical Indications for Biliary Disease Management.

Authors:  Stefano Palmucci; Federica Roccasalva; Marina Piccoli; Giovanni Fuccio Sanzà; Pietro Valerio Foti; Alfonso Ragozzino; Pietro Milone; Giovanni Carlo Ettorre
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.