Literature DB >> 30061189

Reward Learning over Weeks Versus Minutes Increases the Neural Representation of Value in the Human Brain.

G Elliott Wimmer1,2, Jamie K Li2, Krzysztof J Gorgolewski2, Russell A Poldrack2.   

Abstract

Over the past few decades, neuroscience research has illuminated the neural mechanisms supporting learning from reward feedback. Learning paradigms are increasingly being extended to study mood and psychiatric disorders as well as addiction. However, one potentially critical characteristic that this research ignores is the effect of time on learning: human feedback learning paradigms are usually conducted in a single rapidly paced session, whereas learning experiences in ecologically relevant circumstances and in animal research are almost always separated by longer periods of time. In our experiments, we examined reward learning in short condensed sessions distributed across weeks versus learning completed in a single "massed" session in male and female participants. As expected, we found that after equal amounts of training, accuracy was matched between the spaced and massed conditions. However, in a 3-week follow-up, we found that participants exhibited significantly greater memory for the value of spaced-trained stimuli. Supporting a role for short-term memory in massed learning, we found a significant positive correlation between initial learning and working memory capacity. Neurally, we found that patterns of activity in the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex showed stronger discrimination of spaced- versus massed-trained reward values. Further, patterns in the striatum discriminated between spaced- and massed-trained stimuli overall. Our results indicate that single-session learning tasks engage partially distinct learning mechanisms from distributed training. Our studies begin to address a large gap in our knowledge of human learning from reinforcement, with potential implications for our understanding of mood disorders and addiction.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Humans and animals learn to associate predictive value with stimuli and actions, and these values then guide future behavior. Such reinforcement-based learning often happens over long time periods, in contrast to most studies of reward-based learning in humans. In experiments that tested the effect of spacing on learning, we found that associations learned in a single massed session were correlated with short-term memory and significantly decayed over time, whereas associations learned in short massed sessions over weeks were well maintained. Additionally, patterns of activity in the medial temporal lobe and prefrontal cortex discriminated the values of stimuli learned over weeks but not minutes. These results highlight the importance of studying learning over time, with potential applications to drug addiction and psychiatry.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/387649-17$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hippocampus; reinforcement learning; reward; spacing; striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30061189      PMCID: PMC6113901          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0075-18.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  96 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  A framework for studying the neurobiology of value-based decision making.

Authors:  Antonio Rangel; Colin Camerer; P Read Montague
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates.

Authors:  B W Balleine; A Dickinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  1998 Apr-May       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 4.  A neural substrate of prediction and reward.

Authors:  W Schultz; P Dayan; P R Montague
Journal:  Science       Date:  1997-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Working memory contributions to reinforcement learning impairments in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Anne G E Collins; Jaime K Brown; James M Gold; James A Waltz; Michael J Frank
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Episodic memory encoding interferes with reward learning and decreases striatal prediction errors.

Authors:  G Elliott Wimmer; Erin Kendall Braun; Nathaniel D Daw; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Rapid instructed task learning: a new window into the human brain's unique capacity for flexible cognitive control.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Patryk Laurent; Andrea Stocco
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Accurate and robust brain image alignment using boundary-based registration.

Authors:  Douglas N Greve; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mapping value based planning and extensively trained choice in the human brain.

Authors:  Klaus Wunderlich; Peter Dayan; Raymond J Dolan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Repetition suppression: a means to index neural representations using BOLD?

Authors:  Helen C Barron; Mona M Garvert; Timothy E J Behrens
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  14 in total

1.  Neural Systems for Memory-based Value Judgment and Decision-making.

Authors:  Avinash R Vaidya; David Badre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Macaques fail to develop habit responses during extended training on a reinforcer devaluation task.

Authors:  Elyssa M LaFlamme; Farris Ahmed; Patrick A Forcelli; Ludise Malkova
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.154

3.  Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.

Authors:  Christina Bejjani; Audrey Siqi-Liu; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Value network engagement and effects of memory-related processing during encoding and retrieval of value.

Authors:  Lindsay B Conner; Marilyn Horta; Natalie C Ebner; Nichole R Lighthall
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 5.  Memory consolidation as an adaptive process.

Authors:  Emily T Cowan; Anna C Schapiro; Joseph E Dunsmoor; Vishnu P Murty
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-29

6.  Previously Reward-Associated Stimuli Capture Spatial Attention in the Absence of Changes in the Corresponding Sensory Representations as Measured with MEG.

Authors:  Lev Tankelevitch; Eelke Spaak; Matthew F S Rushworth; Mark G Stokes
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data.

Authors:  Robert C Wilson; Anne Ge Collins
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Reactivation of Single-Episode Pain Patterns in the Hippocampus and Decision Making.

Authors:  G Elliott Wimmer; Christian Büchel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Retention of Value Representations Across Time in People With Schizophrenia and Healthy Control Subjects.

Authors:  Adam J Culbreth; James A Waltz; Michael J Frank; James M Gold
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2020-06-02

10.  Effective brain connectivity at rest is associated with choice-induced preference formation.

Authors:  Katharina Voigt; Carsten Murawski; Sebastian Speer; Stefan Bode
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.