Literature DB >> 30060435

Kinetics and microbial community analysis for hydrogen production using raw grass inoculated with different pretreated mixed culture.

Guang Yang1, Jianlong Wang2.   

Abstract

In this study, five pretreatment methods (heat shock, acid, base, aeration and gamma radiation) were applied for enriching hydrogen producers from anaerobically digested sludge, aiming to compare their hydrogen fermentation performance using raw ryegrass as substrate. Results showed that various pretreatment methods caused great variations on grass hydrogen fermentation performance. Acid pretreatment was most efficient compared with other tested pretreatment methods, with relevant hydrogen yield of 64.4mL/g dry grass and organics removal of 31.4%. Kinetics results showed that the first-order kinetic model fitted hydrogen evolution better than the modified Gompertz model. Microbiological analysis showed that various pretreatment methods caused great variations on microbial activity and microbial community composition. Clostridium and Enterococcus were two dominant genera, while relative abundances of these two genera varied greatly for different pretreated samples. Difference in microbial activity and microbial community distribution induced by the pretreatment methods might directly cause different ryegrass fermentation performance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fermentative hydrogen production; Grass; Inoculum pretreatment; Kinetic model; Microbial community

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 30060435     DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioresour Technol        ISSN: 0960-8524            Impact factor:   9.642


  6 in total

1.  Variation of the Prokaryotic and Eukaryotic Communities After Distinct Methods of Thermal Pretreatment of the Inoculum in Hydrogen-Production Reactors from Sugarcane Vinasse.

Authors:  Flaviane Eva Magrini; Gabriela Machado de Almeida; Denis da Maia Soares; Luiz Gustavo Dos Anjos Borges; Leticia Marconatto; Adriana Giongo; Suelen Paesi
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Effect on the ensilage performance and microbial community of adding Neolamarckia cadamba leaves to corn stalks.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Wei Zhou; Cheng Wang; Fuyu Yang; Xiaoyang Chen; Qing Zhang
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 5.813

3.  Air-side ammonia stripping coupled to anaerobic digestion indirectly impacts anaerobic microbiome.

Authors:  Nuria Fernandez-Gonzalez; Chiara Pedizzi; Juan M Lema; Marta Carballa
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Impact of Bacillus on Phthalides Accumulation in Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) by Stoichiometry and Microbial Diversity Analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Meng Feng; Pei Liu; Hui Yan; Sen Zhang; Er-Xin Shang; Guang Yu; Shu Jiang; Da-Wei Qian; Jun-Wei Ma; Jin-Ao Duan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Biogas Production from Physicochemically Pretreated Grass Lawn Waste: Comparison of Different Process Schemes.

Authors:  Georgia Antonopoulou; Dimitrios Vayenas; Gerasimos Lyberatos
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Effects of microbial inoculants on the fermentation characteristics and microbial communities of sweet sorghum bagasse silage.

Authors:  Miaoyin Dong; Qiaoqiao Li; Fuqiang Xu; Shuyang Wang; Jihong Chen; Wenjian Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.