Literature DB >> 30060256

Clinical Impact of Bleeding in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Results from the Hokusai VTE Cancer Study.

Noémie Kraaijpoel1, Marcello Di Nisio2, Frits I Mulder1, Nick van Es1, Jan Beyer-Westendorf3, Marc Carrier4, David Garcia5, Michael Grosso6, Ajay K Kakkar7, Michele F Mercuri6, Saskia Middeldorp1, Cristhiam Rojas Hernandez8, Amparo Santamaria9, Lee Schwocho6, Annelise Segers10, Peter Verhamme11, Tzu-Fei Wang12, Jeffrey I Weitz13, George Zhang6, Jeffrey I Zwicker14, Harry R Büller1, Gary E Raskob15.   

Abstract

In the Hokusai VTE Cancer study, edoxaban was non-inferior to dalteparin for the composite outcome of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) and major bleeding in 1,050 patients with cancer-associated VTE. The absolute rate of recurrent VTE was 3.4% lower with edoxaban, whereas the absolute rate of major bleeding was 2.9% higher. The present analysis focuses on the sites, clinical presentation, course and outcome of bleeding events, and the associated tumour types. Major bleeds and their severity (categories 1-4) were blindly adjudicated by a committee using a priori defined criteria, and data were analysed in the safety population. Major bleeding occurred in 32 of 522 patients given edoxaban (median treatment duration, 211 days) and in 16 of 524 patients treated with dalteparin (median treatment duration, 184 days); no patients had more than one major bleed. There were no fatal bleeds with edoxaban, and two with dalteparin. Severe bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) occurred in 10 (1.9%) and 11 (2.1%) patients in the edoxaban and dalteparin groups, respectively. The excess of major bleeding with edoxaban was confined to patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, severe major bleeding at presentation (category 3 or 4) in this sub-group occurred in 5 of 165 (3.0%) and in 3 of 140 (2.1%) patients given edoxaban or dalteparin, respectively.In conclusion, this analysis suggests that while oral edoxaban is an appropriate alternative to subcutaneous dalteparin for treatment of cancer-associated VTE, the use of edoxaban in patients with gastrointestinal cancer requires careful benefit-risk weighting. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30060256     DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  45 in total

1.  SEOM clinical guideline of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer (2019).

Authors:  A J Muñoz Martín; E Gallardo Díaz; I García Escobar; R Macías Montero; V Martínez-Marín; V Pachón Olmos; P Pérez Segura; T Quintanar Verdúguez; M Salgado Fernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Direct oral anticoagulants in gastrointestinal malignancies: is the convenience worth the risk?

Authors:  Namisha Thapa; Joseph Shatzel; Thomas G Deloughery; Sven R Olson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

Review 3.  Managing the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, and anticoagulation in patients with malignancy.

Authors:  Hanny Al-Samkari; Jean M Connors
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2019-11-26

4.  Cost effectiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) versus dalteparin for the treatment of cancer associated thrombosis (CAT) in the United States.

Authors:  Ang Li; Poorni M Manohar; David A Garcia; Gary H Lyman; Lotte M Steuten
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.944

5.  Managing the competing risks of thrombosis, bleeding, and anticoagulation in patients with malignancy.

Authors:  Hanny Al-Samkari; Jean M Connors
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2019-12-06

Review 6.  Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Cancer: New Insights from Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Cristhiam M Rojas-Hernandez; Thein Hlaing Oo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Approach to Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Challenging Situations and Knowledge Gaps.

Authors:  Tzu-Fei Wang; Henny H Billett; Jean M Connors; Gerald A Soff
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-12-04

8.  Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Dong; Yi Wang; Rui-Lian Ma; Ming Liu; Jun-Zhen Gao; Wu-Yun Su; Li Yan; Jian-Jun Sun
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOAC) as an Alternative Treatment Option in Tumor-Related Venous Thromboembolism.

Authors:  Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Robert Klamroth; Stephan Kreher; Florian Langer; Axel Matzdorff; Hanno Riess
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Direct versus conventional anticoagulants for treatment of cancer associated thrombosis: a pooled and interaction analysis between observational studies and randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Zhi-Chun Gu; Yi-Dan Yan; Sheng-Yan Yang; Long Shen; Ling-Cong Kong; Chi Zhang; An-Hua Wei; Zheng Li; Xin-Hua Wang; Hou-Wen Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.