| Literature DB >> 30060017 |
Saber Sami1, Nitin Williams2, Laura E Hughes1,3, Thomas E Cope1, Timothy Rittman1, Ian T S Coyle-Gilchrist1, Richard N Henson3, James B Rowe1,3.
Abstract
The disruption of brain networks is characteristic of neurodegenerative dementias. However, it is controversial whether changes in connectivity reflect only the functional anatomy of disease, with selective vulnerability of brain networks, or the specific neurophysiological consequences of different neuropathologies within brain networks. We proposed that the oscillatory dynamics of cortical circuits reflect the tuning of local neural interactions, such that different pathologies are selective in their impact on the frequency spectrum of oscillations, whereas clinical syndromes reflect the anatomical distribution of pathology and physiological change. To test this hypothesis, we used magnetoencephalography from five patient groups, representing dissociated pathological subtypes and distributions across frontal, parietal and temporal lobes: amnestic Alzheimer's disease, posterior cortical atrophy, and three syndromes associated with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We measured effective connectivity with graph theory-based measures of local efficiency, using partial directed coherence between sensors. As expected, each disease caused large-scale changes of neurophysiological brain networks, with reductions in local efficiency compared to controls. Critically however, the frequency range of altered connectivity was consistent across clinical syndromes that shared a likely underlying pathology, whilst the localization of changes differed between clinical syndromes. Multivariate pattern analysis of the frequency-specific topographies of local efficiency separated the disorders from each other and from controls (accuracy 62% to 100%, according to the groups' differences in likely pathology and clinical syndrome). The data indicate that magnetoencephalography has the potential to reveal specific changes in neurophysiology resulting from neurodegenerative disease. Our findings confirm that while clinical syndromes have characteristic anatomical patterns of abnormal connectivity that may be identified with other methods like structural brain imaging, the different mechanisms of neurodegeneration also cause characteristic spectral signatures of physiological coupling that are not accessible with structural imaging nor confounded by the neurovascular signalling of functional MRI. We suggest that these spectral characteristics of altered connectivity are the result of differential disruption of neuronal microstructure and synaptic physiology by Alzheimer's disease versus frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30060017 PMCID: PMC6061803 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awy180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Clinical and neuropsychological data for patient participants
| 15 | 13 | 11 | 13 | 11 | 15 | |
| Age | 66.3 ± 5.9 | 71.3 ± 7.4 | 60.5 ± 4.5* | 64.3 ± 6.9 | 72 ± 8.7 | 67.9 ± 6.5 |
| MMSE (0–30) | 29.4 ± 0.7 | 25.0 ± 3.2*** | 19.6 ± 6.0*** | 24.6 ± 3.8*** | 27.9 ± 2.2* | 27.0 ± 2.8** |
| ACE-R (0–100) | 96.5 ± 4.4 | 71.5 ± 8.2*** | 53.7 ± 21.3*** | 71.8 ± 14.8*** | 84.3 ± 11.6** | 83.2 ± 7.9*** |
| ACE-R memory (0–26) | 25.2 ± 1.0 | 12.7 ± 3.6*** | 13.6 ± 7.8*** | 17.9 ± 5.5*** | 21.6 ± 6.9 | 22.0 ± 4.0** |
Data are presented as mean ± SD.
ACE-R = revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination, total (0–100) and its memory subscale (0–26); MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; RS = Richardson’s syndrome; tAD = typical amnestic Alzheimer’s disease.
Differences between each patient group and controls: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001 uncorrected.
Figure 1Data analysis pipeline. Clockwise from top: Preprocessing, to remove biological artefacts using MaxFilter and independent component analysis denoising; estimation of effective connectivity using MVAR; compiling the association matrix between sensors by PDC; applying a statistical threshold to create a binarized graph, represented by the connectivity matrix; graph network analysis to estimate local efficiency; and group classification using a support vector machine (SVM).
Figure 23D scalp-frequency images of local efficiency. The schematic (top left) indicates the three projections: the topography (Top) for each frequency (1–80 Hz), an anterior-posterior (AP) projection, separating frequency but collapsing over left–right axis, and a ‘lateral’ view, separating by frequency but collapsing over anterior-posterior axis. The five subplots (A–E) indicate the T-value for the difference in local efficiency for each patient group versus controls (colour bar on right). The cross-hair shows the peak T-statistic, while the black outline indicates regions surviving a cluster-corrected threshold of P < 0.05.
Figure 3ROC curves illustrate the performance of the support vector machine classifier following principle component feature extraction for binary classifications between each pair of patient groups. The classification performance between patient groups is summarized by the area under the curve (AUC, inset). AD = Alzheimer disease.