Literature DB >> 30059928

Assessing the influences of ecological restoration on perceptions of cultural ecosystem services by residents of agricultural landscapes of western China.

Yuehan Dou1, Lin Zhen2, Xiubo Yu3, Martha Bakker4, Gerrit-Jan Carsjens4, Zhichao Xue5.   

Abstract

Landscape change caused by ecological restoration projects has both positive and negative influences on human livelihoods, yet surprisingly little research on the cultural consequences of ecological restoration in agricultural landscapes has taken place. Cultural consequences can be captured in the ecosystem services framework as cultural ecosystem services (CES). However, assessment and valuation of these services to support decision-making for this essential ecosystem is lacking. To help fill this gap, we assessed the opinions of Chinese rural communities about CES and the changes in their perception under the Grain for Green program (GFG), a nationwide program to relieve the pressure on ecosystems (soil erosion and land degradation) by converting cultivated land or barren land on steep slopes into grassland and forests. We used Guyuan City in China's Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region as a case study, using a workshop to identify the CES provided by the agricultural landscape, followed by semi-structured household interviews to quantify perceptions of these CES. We found that all eight CES types identified by the workshop were perceived by the rural communities. Reforestation changed their perceptions of CES directly due to land cover change and indirectly due to the resulting economic changes and migration of mostly young workers in search of better jobs. Cultivated land was perceived as more important than forest for CES provision. In addition, residential areas were perceived as providing significant CES because of local traditions that produce close and highly social neighborhood bonds in agricultural landscapes.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agricultural landscapes; Cultural ecosystem services; Ecological restoration; Household survey; Human perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059928     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Identifying the Spatial Imbalance in the Supply and Demand of Cultural Ecosystem Services.

Authors:  Qinqin Shi; Hai Chen; Di Liu; Tianwei Geng; Hang Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Effect of Urban fringes green space fragmentation on ecosystem service value.

Authors:  Yingying Guan; Xueming Li; Songbo Li; He Sun; He Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Gray Forecast of Ecosystem Services Value and Its Driving Forces in Karst Areas of China: A Case Study in Guizhou Province, China.

Authors:  Sipei Pan; Jiale Liang; Wanxu Chen; Jiangfeng Li; Ziqi Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Revealing Spatial Patterns of Cultural Ecosystem Services in Four Agricultural Landscapes: A Case Study from Hangzhou, China.

Authors:  Shan He; Chenxia Hu; Jianfeng Li; Jieyi Wu; Qian Xu; Lin Lin; Congmou Zhu; Yongjun Li; Mengmeng Zhou; Luyao Zhu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Spatial Analysis of Cultivated Land Productivity, Site Condition and Cultivated Land Health at County Scale.

Authors:  Fengqiang Wu; Caijian Mo; Xiaojun Dai; Hongmei Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.