Literature DB >> 30059799

Glial-derived growth factor and pleiotrophin synergistically promote axonal regeneration in critical nerve injuries.

Nesreen Zoghoul Alsmadi1, Geetanjali S Bendale1, Aswini Kanneganti1, Tarik Shihabeddin2, An H Nguyen2, Elijah Hor2, Swarup Dash2, Benjamin Johnston2, Rafael Granja-Vazquez2, Mario I Romero-Ortega3.   

Abstract

The repair of nerve gap injuries longer than 3 cm is limited by the need to sacrifice donor tissue and the morbidity associated with the autograft gold standard, while decellularized grafts and biodegradable conduits are effective only in short nerve defects. The advantage of isogenic nerve implants seems to be the release of various growth factors by the denervated Schwann cells. We evaluated the effect of vascular endothelial growth factor, neurotrophins, and pleiotrophin (PTN) supplementation of multi-luminal conduits, in the repair of 3 and 4 cm nerve gaps in the rabbit peroneal nerve. In vitro screening revealed a synergistic regenerative effect of PTN with glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) in promoting sensory axon density, and motor axonal growth from spinal cord explants. In vivo, pleiotrophins were able to support nerve regrowth across a 3 cm gap. In the 4 cm lesions, PTN-GDNF had a modest effect in the number of axons distal to the implant, while increasing the mean axon diameter (1 ± 0.4; p ≤ 0.001) over PTN or GDNF alone (0.80 ± 0.2, 0.84 ± 0.5; respectively). Some regenerated axons reinnervated muscle targets as indicated by neuromuscular junction staining. However, many were wrapped in Remak bundles, suggesting a delay in axonal sorting, explaining the limited electrophysiological function of the reinnervated muscle, and the modest recovery in toe spreading in the PTN-GDNF repaired animals. These results support the use of synergistic neurotrophic/pleiotrophic growth factors in long gap repair and underscore the need for re-myelination strategies distal to the injury site. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Nerve injuries due to trauma or tumor resection often result in long gaps that are challenging to repair. The best clinical option demands the use of autologous grafts that are associated with serious side effects. Bioengineered nerves are considered a good alternative, particularly if supplemented with growth factors, but current options do not match the regenerative capacity of autografts. This study revealed the synergistic effect of neurotrophins and pleiotrophins designed to achieve a broad cellular regenerative effect, and that GDNF-PTN are able to mediated axonal growth and partial functional recovery in a 4 cm nerve gap injury, albeit delays in remyelination. This report underscores the need for defining an optimal growth factor support for biosynthetic nerve implants.
Copyright © 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agarose; Long gap; Micro-channels; Neurotrophins; Pleiotrophins; Remak bundles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059799      PMCID: PMC6131028          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  62 in total

1.  Factors that influence peripheral nerve regeneration: an electrophysiological study of the monkey median nerve.

Authors:  Christian Krarup; Simon J Archibald; Roger D Madison
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  GDNF-chitosan blended nerve guides: a functional study.

Authors:  Minal Patel; Li Mao; Bin Wu; Pamela J Vandevord
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.963

3.  The basis for diminished functional recovery after delayed peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  Tessa Gordon; Neil Tyreman; Mukaila A Raji
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Peripheral nerve repair through multi-luminal biosynthetic implants.

Authors:  K E Tansey; J L Seifert; B Botterman; M R Delgado; M I Romero
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Axonally derived neuregulin-1 is required for remyelination and regeneration after nerve injury in adulthood.

Authors:  Florence R Fricker; Natalia Lago; Sharmili Balarajah; Christoforos Tsantoulas; Shamil Tanna; Ning Zhu; Samaher K Fageiry; Mark Jenkins; Alistair N Garratt; Carmen Birchmeier; David L H Bennett
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  3D Printed Anatomical Nerve Regeneration Pathways.

Authors:  Blake N Johnson; Karen Z Lancaster; Gehua Zhen; Junyun He; Maneesh K Gupta; Yong Lin Kong; Esteban A Engel; Kellin D Krick; Alex Ju; Fanben Meng; Lynn W Enquist; Xiaofeng Jia; Michael C McAlpine
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 18.808

7.  A composite poly-hydroxybutyrate-glial growth factor conduit for long nerve gap repairs.

Authors:  P N Mohanna; R C Young; M Wiberg; G Terenghi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Controlled release and gradient formation of human glial-cell derived neurotrophic factor from heparinated poly(ethylene glycol) microsphere-based scaffolds.

Authors:  Jacob L Roam; Peter K Nguyen; Donald L Elbert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Schwann cell phenotype is regulated by axon modality and central-peripheral location, and persists in vitro.

Authors:  T M Brushart; M Aspalter; J W Griffin; R Redett; H Hameed; C Zhou; M Wright; A Vyas; A Höke
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 5.330

10.  Asymmetric Sensory-Motor Regeneration of Transected Peripheral Nerves Using Molecular Guidance Cues.

Authors:  Sanjay Anand; Vidhi Desai; Nesreen Alsmadi; Aswini Kanneganti; Dianna Huyen-Tram Nguyen; Martin Tran; Lokesh Patil; Srikanth Vasudevan; Cancan Xu; Yi Hong; Jonathan Cheng; Edward Keefer; Mario I Romero-Ortega
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Biological Approach in the Treatment of External Popliteal Sciatic Nerve (Epsn) Neurological Injury: Review.

Authors:  Alejandro León-Andrino; David C Noriega; Juan P Lapuente; Daniel Pérez-Valdecantos; Alberto Caballero-García; Azael J Herrero; Alfredo Córdova
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  3D spheroids of human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells attenuate spinal cord injury in mice.

Authors:  Junhao Deng; Miao Li; Fanqi Meng; Zhongyang Liu; Song Wang; Yuan Zhang; Ming Li; Zhirui Li; Licheng Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 8.469

3.  Pericyte‑derived extracellular vesicles‑mimetic nanovesicles improves peripheral nerve regeneration in mouse models of sciatic nerve transection.

Authors:  Guo Nan Yin; Tae Young Shin; Jiyeon Ock; Min-Ji Choi; Anita Limanjaya; Mi-Hye Kwon; Fang-Yuan Liu; Soon-Sun Hong; Ju-Hee Kang; Yong Song Gho; Jun-Kyu Suh; Ji-Kan Ryu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 4.  Repair of the Injured Spinal Cord by Schwann Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Haitao Fu; Die Hu; Jinli Chen; Qizun Wang; Yingze Zhang; Chao Qi; Tengbo Yu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  Incorporating Blood Flow in Nerve Injury and Regeneration Assessment.

Authors:  Stewart Yeoh; Wesley S Warner; Samer S Merchant; Edward W Hsu; Denes V Agoston; Mark A Mahan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 6.  Biomaterials and Regenerative Medicine in Pain Management.

Authors:  Xingjian Gu; Michelle A Carroll Turpin; Mario I Romero-Ortega
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 7.  Restoration of Neurological Function Following Peripheral Nerve Trauma.

Authors:  Damien P Kuffler; Christian Foy
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  A sciatic nerve gap-injury model in the rabbit.

Authors:  Antonio Merolli; Michelle Li; Gregory Voronin; Lauren Bright
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.