Literature DB >> 30059770

Subjective social status is associated with compensation for large meals - A prospective pilot study.

Nadeeja N Wijayatunga1, Bridget Ironuma2, John A Dawson3, Bailey Rusinovich4, Candice A Myers5, Michelle Cardel6, Gregory Pavela7, Corby K Martin8, David B Allison9, Emily J Dhurandhar10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Subjective social status (SSS) is known to be inversely associated with obesity. Our objective was to determine if SSS is associated with eating behaviors that would predispose to weight gain, specifically, with inadequate compensation for excess energy consumed during a single large meal. Therefore, we conducted a pilot study to determine the association of SSS with 24-h energy balance, 24-h and post-lunch energy intake, changes in body composition and changes in adjusted resting energy expenditure on days when a high-energy lunch was consumed in free-living human subjects.
METHOD: Female participants (7 normal weight and 10 overweight) consumed 60% of' estimated 24-h energy requirements as a lunchtime meal in the laboratory for 14 days. Subjective social status was measured at baseline using the MacArthur Scale. Remote Food Photography Method was used to record food intake outside of the lab on days 1-2, 7-8, and 12-13. Associations of 24-h energy balance, 24-h and post-lunch energy intake, changes in adjusted resting energy expenditure and changes in percent body fat (measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry) with SSS were studied.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) age and BMI were 36.29 (8.25) years and 26.43 (2.32) kg/m2, respectively. Lower SSS was significantly associated with positive energy balance (p for trend 0.002), and higher post-lunch energy intake (p = 0.02) when controlled for age and initial body mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data show that lower SSS is associated with higher post-lunch energy intake, which is indicative of poor energy compensation following a large meal. Over a longer time period, this could result in fat mass gain. Studies that are of longer duration and well-powered are warranted to confirm our findings.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Energy balance; Obesity; Socioeconomic status; Subjective social status

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30059770      PMCID: PMC6444908          DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  4 in total

1.  Experimentally Manipulated Low Social Status and Food Insecurity Alter Eating Behavior Among Adolescents: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Michelle I Cardel; Greg Pavela; David Janicke; Tianyao Huo; Darci Miller; Alexandra M Lee; Matthew J Gurka; Emily Dhurandhar; John C Peters; Ann E Caldwell; Eric Krause; Alicia Fernandez; David B Allison
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 5.002

2.  Subjective Social Status Is Associated with Dysregulated Eating Behaviors and Greater Body Mass Index in an Urban Predominantly Black and Low-Income Sample.

Authors:  Monika M Stojek; Paulina Wardawy; Charles F Gillespie; Jennifer S Stevens; Abigail Powers; Vasiliki Michopoulos
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Subjective Socioeconomic Status, Cognitive Abilities, and Personal Control: Associations With Health Behaviours.

Authors:  Pål Kraft; Brage Kraft; Thomas Hagen; Thomas Espeseth
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Subjective socioeconomic disadvantage is indirectly associated with food portion selection through perceived disruption of personal resources during a nationwide COVID-19 stay-at-home order.

Authors:  Bobby K Cheon; Li Ling Lee
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.016

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.