Selective inhibition of monoamine oxidase by p-aminosubstituted phenylalkylamines in catecholaminergic neurones.

The in vivo inhibition of monoamine oxidase (MAO) inside and outside noradrenergic and dopaminergic nerve terminals in the hypothalamus and striatum, respectively, was examined in the rat after oral administration of a series of substituted p-aminophenethylamines and some related compounds. This was achieved by measuring their ability to protect MAO from irreversible inhibition by phenelzine, determined by the deaminating activity of synaptosomal preparations in the absence and presence of maprotiline, a selective inhibitor of the uptake of noradrenaline, or of amfonelic acid, a potent inhibitor of the uptake of dopamine, with small (0.25 microM) concentrations of [14C]noradrenaline or [14C]dopamine as substrate. It was found that several of these compounds were much more potent in protecting MAO within the noradrenergic neurones than MAO in other cells. Since the inhibitors of the uptake of noradrenaline, desipramine and CPP 199 antagonized this preference for noradrenergic MAO it is concluded that these MAO inhibitors are accumulated in the noradrenergic neurones by the membranal uptake carrier. Hence the selectivity for MAO within noradrenergic neurones seems to reflect the ability of the compounds to be transported by this carrier. The structure-activity relationship obtained showed the greatest selectivity for the unsubstituted p-dimethylamino-(FLA 289), p-methylamino-(FLA 727) and p-amino-(FLA 334)-amphetamines, whereas the 2-fluoro compound (FLA 558) had the greatest potency. N,N-didesmethylamiflamine [FLA 668(+)] had an almost specific effect in the noradrenergic nerve terminals. The primary p-amino derivatives, FLA 334 and FLA 668, produced a marked selective protection of MAO in dopaminergic nerve terminals, whereas the tertiary and secondary derivatives had much less preference for dopaminergic MAO.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)