Literature DB >> 30058382

How U.S. research institutions are responding to the single Institutional Review Board mandate.

David B Resnik1, Elise M Smith1, Min Shi1.   

Abstract

One of the most significant changes to the Common Rule is the requirement that institutions use a single Institutional Review Board (IRB) for cooperative research in the United States, unless more than one IRB is required by state, local, or tribal law, or a signatory federal agency decides an exception is warranted. We surveyed Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) officials at the top U.S. research institutions to understand their knowledge and opinion of the mandate, what steps their institutions are taking, and difficulties their institutions are facing. One-hundred seven institutions (56.9%) responded to the survey. While support for the single-IRB mandate was positive overall, most respondents acknowledged that their institution is likely to face some difficulties complying with it. Regulatory agencies can help institutions to comply with the mandate by providing guidance concerning such issues as exceptions to the mandate, local context review, oversight, and implementation of reliance agreements, and development of policies, procedures, and best practices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Common rule; human research regulation; institutional review boards; legal liability; reliance agreements

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30058382      PMCID: PMC6336442          DOI: 10.1080/08989621.2018.1506337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Account Res        ISSN: 0898-9621            Impact factor:   2.622


  4 in total

1.  Single-Minded Research Review: The Common Rule and Single IRB Policy.

Authors:  Carrie D Wolinetz; Francis S Collins
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 2.  Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: the state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform.

Authors:  George Silberman; Katherine L Kahn
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2017-01-19

4.  Single IRBs in Multisite Trials: Questions Posed by the New NIH Policy.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Ekaterina Pivovarova; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 56.272

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  The IRB Reliance Exchange (IREx): A national web-based platform for operationalizing single IRB review.

Authors:  Emily Sheffer Serdoz; Terri Edwards; Jill Pulley; Jenni Beadles; Julie Ozier; Paul Harris; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Pediatric specific challenges of the single institutional review board mandate.

Authors:  Andrew Hu; Jane L Holl; Mehul V Raval
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.