Literature DB >> 30058062

Evaluation of the Quality and Accessibility of Available Websites on Kidney Transplantation.

Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi1, Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: (i) to assess the quality of health websites on kidney transplant and (ii) to evaluate the accessibility of these websites and their concordance with the existing guidelines.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The terms "kidney transplantation" and "renal transplantation" were searched in the three most popular search engines Google, Yahoo, and Bing. 58 unique websites were eligible for the analysis . The Websites accessibility was evaluated using the AChecker tool. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed to examine any significant difference between accessibility issues across different domains. The eligible websites were screenedfor quality based on the HONcode of conducts. Moreover, the daily traffic data of each website was determined by Alexa. The correlation of known accessibility problems with website popularity was examined too. RESULT: The main reported known problems belonged to "scripts must have functional text," "text equivalents," "accessible forms," and "text links for server-side image map". Although the mean accessibility errors in governmental (10.25 ± 7.274) and organizational (12.31 ± 9.469) websites were less than those in the other domains, the differences were not significant (P = 0.60). Findings showed no significant correlation (P > 0.05) betweenthe extent of known problems (16.50 ± 12.18) and Alexa ranking (253675.07 ± 534690.947). Furthermore, most websites on kidney transplant were not certified by the HONcode.
CONCLUSION: The health websites designers should be aware of accessibility problems, because there is a growing population of potential users with disabilities. This study indicated the need to ensure the compliance of kidney transplant websites with accessibility guidelines such as Section 508. Furthermore, most surveyed websites were of poor quality and unreliable. Therefore, physicians should warn their patients about unqualified online health information and guide them to websites which are more reliable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30058062     DOI: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol J        ISSN: 1735-1308            Impact factor:   1.510


  9 in total

1.  Evaluating breast cancer websites targeting Arabic speakers: empirical investigation of popularity, availability, accessibility, readability, and quality.

Authors:  Zahraa Jasem; Zainab AlMeraj; Dari Alhuwail
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 3.298

2.  Assessing the eHealth literacy skills of family caregivers of medically ill elderly.

Authors:  Ali Soleimaninejad; Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2019-09-19

3.  Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Fuzhi Wang; Zhuoxin Wang; Weiwei Sun; Xiumu Yang; Zhiwei Bian; Lining Shen; Wei Pan; Peng Liu; Xingzhi Chen; Lianguo Fu; Fan Zhang; Dan Luo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.773

4.  Topics, Delivery Modes, and Social-Epistemological Dimensions of Web-Based Information for Patients Undergoing Renal Transplant and Living Donors During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Content Analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte W van Klaveren; Peter G M de Jong; Renée A Hendriks; Franka Luk; Aiko P J de Vries; Paul J M van der Boog; Marlies E J Reinders
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Are health websites credible enough for elderly self-education in the most prevalent elderly diseases?

Authors:  Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh; Ali Soleimaninejad; Seyedeh Fatemeh Mousavi Shirazi; Parisa Mollaei
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Health websites on COVID-19: are they readable and credible enough to help public self-care?

Authors:  Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi; Yasser Khazaal; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2021-01-01

7.  An evaluation of the quality of COVID-19 websites in terms of HON principles and using DISCERN tool.

Authors:  Reza Safdari; Marsa Gholamzadeh; Soheila Saeedi; Mozhgan Tanhapour; Sorayya Rezayi
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2022-08-10

8.  Websites as a tool for public health education: determining the trustworthiness of health websites on Ebola disease.

Authors:  Ronak Hamzehei; Masoumeh Ansari; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh; Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2018-12-30

9.  eHealth Literacy and General Interest in Using Online Health Information: A Survey Among Patients with Dental Diseases.

Authors:  Saeideh Valizadeh-Haghi; Shahabedin Rahmatizadeh
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2018-12-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.