| Literature DB >> 30058050 |
Anna Mirska1, Wojciech Kułak2, Bożena Okurowska-Zawada2, Elżbieta Dmitruk2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of long-term therapy with multiply botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections.Entities:
Keywords: Botulinum toxin; Cerebral palsy; Gait; Muscle tone; Range of motion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30058050 PMCID: PMC6341047 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-018-3923-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Childs Nerv Syst ISSN: 0256-7040 Impact factor: 1.475
Clinical characteristics of 60 patients with cerebral palsy
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| Mean | 5.8 ± 3.4 |
| Range | 2–16 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 33 |
| Female | 27 |
| Type of spastic cerebral palsy | |
| Hemiplegia | 10 |
| Diplegia | 20 |
| Tetraplegia | 30 |
| GMFCS level | |
| I | 3 |
| II | 27 |
| III | 10 |
| IV | 13 |
| V | 7 |
| Number of BoNT treatments | |
| 1 | 37 |
| 2 | 19 |
| 3 | 13 |
| 4 | 13 |
| > 5 | 18 |
GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System, BoNT Botulinum Neurotoxin
Fig. 1Generalized additive model models of temporal dynamics of MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) (a), ROM-E (range of motion in ankle joint with extended knee joint) (b), ROM-F (range of motion in ankle joint with flexed knee joint) (c), and PRS (Physician Rating Scale) (d); Δ is the difference between post-injection and pre-injection scores
General additive model results for clinical assessments used to study the effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) treatment after 2 weeks at the injection
| Parameter | Observed change (mean; ±) | Two-factor models | Four-factor models, including effects of type of cerebral palsy and GMFCS level | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of BoNT treatments | Patient’s age | Number of BoNT treatments | Patient’s age | ||||||
| F |
| F |
| F |
| F |
| ||
| ∆ MAS | − 0.49 ± 0.44 | 0.127 | 0.722 | 0.467 | 0.6 | 0.169 | 0.682 | 0.101 | 0.744 |
| ∆ ROM-E | 0.36 ± 0.48 | 1.02 | 0.385 | 1.139 | 0.288 | 2.244 | 0.156 | 0.234 | 0.63 |
| ∆ ROM-F | 0.37 ± 0.44 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 1.425 | 0.206 | 1.067 | 0.275 | 1.2387 | 0.278 |
| ∆ PRS | 0.90 ± 1.15 | 0.022 | 0.884 | 7.491 | 0.007 | 0.043 | 0.836 | 6.083 | 0.016 |
MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, ROM-E passive range of motion in ankle joint with extended knee joint, ROM-F passive range of motion in ankle joint with flexed knee joint, PRS Physician Rating Scale; ∆ is the difference between post-injection and pre-injection scores
Fig. 2Generalized additive model of change in Physician Rating Scale (PRS) with patient’s age. Δ is the difference between post-injection and pre-injection scores
Generalized additive model significance test results for changes in values of clinical assessments after BoNT treatments (2 weeks after the injection) were tested as a function of cerebral palsy type and impairment level
| Variables | Regression parameter | SE |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ∆ MAS | ||||
| Intercept | − 0.776 | 0.23 | − 3.38 | 0.001 |
| Hemiplegic vs. diplegic | − 0.294 | 0.118 | − 2.499 | 0.014 |
| ∆ ROM-E | ||||
| Intercept | − 0.077 | 0.25 | − 0.307 | 0.76 |
| Hemiplegic vs. diplegic | 0.414 | 0.13 | 3.172 | 0.002 |
| ∆ ROM-F | ||||
| Intercept | 0.005 | 0.237 | 0.022 | 0.983 |
| GMFCS level III vs. GMFCS level I | 0.603 | 0.264 | 2.286 | 0.025 |
| GMFCS level V vs. GMFCS level I | 0.691 | 0.298 | 2.321 | 0.023 |
MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, ROM-E passive range of motion in ankle joint with extended knee joint, ROM-F passive range of motion in ankle joint with flexed knee joint, GMFCS Gross Motor Function Classification System; ∆ is the difference between post-injection and pre-injection scores