| Literature DB >> 30057861 |
Tamar Guy-Haim1,2, Noa Simon-Blecher3, Amos Frumkin4, Israel Naaman4, Yair Achituv3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aquatic subterranean species often exhibit disjunct distributions, with high level of endemism and small range, shaped by vicariance, limited dispersal, and evolutionary rates. We studied the disjunct biogeographic patterns of an endangered blind cave shrimp, Typhlocaris, and identified the geological and evolutionary processes that have shaped its divergence pattern.Entities:
Keywords: Cave; Divergence time; Mediterranean Sea; Messinian Salinity Crisis; Speciation; Stygofauna; Subterranean; Transgression; Typhlocaris; Vicariance
Year: 2018 PMID: 30057861 PMCID: PMC6061184 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Figure 1Distribution map of Typhlocaris species (colored in red) based on spatial data from NatureServe and IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature).
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2014.1. (http://www.iucnredlist.org), downloaded on January 28, 2018. Map made using Natural Earth data (http://www.naturalearthdata.com).
Figure 2Schemes describing the two hypotheses of development of the disjunct distribution of Typhlocaris.
(A) H1: the peri-Mediterranean transgression scenario. (B) H2: tectonic isolation of the eastern Galilee from the Mediterranean followed by stranding to the coastal aquifers by ingressions.
Nucleotide analysis and substitution models selected (out of 24 candidate models) for all the genes/partitions.
| Partition | Length (bp) | Informative positions | Variable positions | Model | Nst-rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12S | 394 | 161 | 236 | T92+G | 6—Gamma |
| 16S | 972 | 160 | 221 | HKY+G | 2—Gamma |
| COI | 663 | 254 | 286 | GTR+G+I | 6—Gamma |
| 18S | 1914 | 263 | 342 | K2+G | 2—Gamma |
| 28S | 2059 | 306 | 659 | T92+G | 6—Gamma |
| ITS | 1795 | 612 | 1523 | T92+G | 6—Gamma |
| H3 | 358 | 50 | 97 | K2+G | 2—Gamma |
Divergence times (and 95% CI) for Typhlocaris species as estimated using Bayesian evolutionary analysis method calculated using COI and 16S gene molecular evolution rates and using calibration based on Bira formation.
| Clade divergence | Gene | Node age (Myr) (range) non-calibrated | Calibration node | Node age (Myr) (range) calibrated | Posterior probability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COI | 13.4 (10.6–14.0) | – | 19.9 (17.3–22.5) | 0.48 | |
| 16S | 19.1 (16.5–22.2) | 41.5 (35.8–48.5) | 1.00 | ||
| ( | COI | 3.7 (3.0–4.5) | 7.0 (Bira) | 1.00 | |
| 16S | 3.3 (2.3–4.2) | 1.00 | |||
| COI | 3.2 (2.4–3.8) | – | 5.7 (4.4–6.9) | 0.76 | |
| 16S | 2.6 (1.6–3.4) | 5.8 (3.5–7.2) | 0.76 |
Figure 3Multi-locus maximum-likelihood tree of the genus Typhlocaris, based on combined 12S rRNA + 16S rRNA + COI + 18S rRNA + 28S rRNA + ITS + H3 genes (total 7,761 bp).
At each node, the number above the branch indicates the percentage of ML bootstrap support (1,000 replicates) from RAxML analysis with the GTRCAT model of evolution. The number below the branch at each node indicates the Bayesian posterior probability expressed as a decimal fraction for nodes that received at least 50% support in at least one analysis. The scale bar denotes the estimated number of nucleotide substitutions per site.
Comparison between the COI and 16S molecular evolution rates estimated in this and previous crustacean studies.
| Gene | Stygofauna | Non-Stygofauna | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Substitutions/Myr | Species | Substitutions/Myr | |
| COI mtRNA | 0.0077 | 0.0140 | ||
| 0.0133–0.0516 | 0.2000 | |||
| 0.0125 | ||||
| 16S rRNA | 0.0046 | 0.0065 | ||
| 0.0055–0.0103 | 0.0090 | |||
Notes:
This study.
Knowlton & Weigt (1998).
Page, Humphreys & Hughes (2008).
Schubart, Diesel & Hedges (1998).
Sturmbauer, Levinton & Christy (1996).
Ketmaier, Argano & Caccone (2003).
Craft et al. (2008).