| Literature DB >> 30057685 |
Ewa Dudzińska1, Magdalena Gryzinska2, Katarzyna Ognik3, Paulina Gil-Kulik4, Janusz Kocki4.
Abstract
Oxidative stress plays an important role in IBD because chronic intestinal inflammation is associated with the overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to oxidative stress, which has been implicated in IBD. Many lines of evidence suggest that IBD is associated with an imbalance between ROS and antioxidant activity which generates oxidative stress as the result of either ROS overproduction or a decrease in antioxidant activity. Our study was to evaluate the influence of oxidative stress and antioxidants on the course of the disease and treatment of IBD patients. Our results show that an increase of LOOH levels positively correlates with an increase in MDA levels; therefore, MDA may be a marker indicating lipid peroxidation. Also, being the decomposition product of oxidation processes, MDA may be applied as a useful biomarker for identifying the effect of endogenous oxidative stress in Crohn's disease patients. The anti-inflammatory efficacy of AZA drugs may be the result of a reduction of the amount of lipid peroxides in the intestinal mucosa cells in CD patients and facilitate mucosal healing.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30057685 PMCID: PMC6051053 DOI: 10.1155/2018/7918261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Levels of Cu, Zn, Na, CAT, GSH + GSSG, MDA, LOOH, and Cp among CD and UC patients and control individuals (mean ± SD).
| Parameters | Control | CD | UC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cu ( | 17.44 ± 4.05 | 12.46 ± 11.59 | 12.18 ± 7.59 |
| Zn ( | 13.82 ± 2.77 | 19.61 ± 12.65 | 21.37 ± 8.52 |
| SOD (U/l) | 51,172.16 ± 23,136.88 | 51,610.23 ± 11,519.05 | 80,331.09 ± 35,002.31 |
| CAT (U/l) | 94,452.77 ± 169,943.87 | 45,030.43 ± 25,470.33 | 120,306.51 ± 158,262.62 |
| GSH + GSSG ( | 0.70 ± 0.49 | 1.04 ± 0.90 | 0.77 ± 0.62 |
| MDA ( | 6.72 ± 2.21 | 4.15 ± 2.16 | 3.87 ± 2.32 |
| LOOH ( | 51.08 ± 20.58 | 15.44 ± 8.31 | 17.06 ± 5.85 |
| Cp ( | 212.84 ± 17.73 | 199.09 ± 85.67 | 234.40 ± 76.98 |
Correlation of age, duration, CRP, WBC, RBC Cu, Zn, Na, CAT, GSH + GSSG, MDA, LOOH, and Cp among CD and UC patients and control individuals.
| Parameters | Age | Duration | CRP | WBC | RBC | Cu ( | Zn ( | SOD (U/l) | CAT (U/l) | GSH + GSSG ( | MDA ( | LOOH ( | Cp ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condition | UC | ||||||||||||
| Cu ( | 0.536 | 0.303 | −0.216 | −0.198 | 0.605 | — | 0.652 | 0.549 | 0.382 | −0.190 | −0.044 | −0.009 | 0.766∗ |
| Zn ( | −0.155 | −0.200 | −0.228 | −0.636 | 0.266 | 0.652 | — | 0.740 | 0.422 | 0.445 | 0.520 | −0.492 | 0.898∗ |
| SOD (U/l) | 0.260 | 0.172 | −0.257 | −0.351 | −0.063 | 0.549 | 0.740 | — | −0.024 | 0.241 | 0.079 | −0.364 | 0.510 |
| CAT (U/l) | −0.316 | −0.683 | −0.234 | −0.547 | 0.513 | 0.382 | 0.422 | −0.024 | — | −0.152 | 0.531 | −0.464 | 0.697 |
| GSH + GSSG ( | −0.516 | −0.261 | 0.497 | −0.313 | −0.569 | −0.190 | 0.445 | 0.241 | −0.152 | — | 0.698 | −0.101 | 0.257 |
| MDA ( | −0.652 | −0.679 | 0.202 | −0.751 | −0.214 | −0.044 | 0.520 | 0.079 | 0.531 | 0.698 | — | −0.510 | 0.583 |
| LOOH ( | 0.439 | 0.486 | 0.692 | 0.886∗ | −0.151 | −0.009 | −0.492 | −0.364 | −0.464 | −0.101 | −0.510 | — | −0.409 |
| Cp ( | −0.072 | −0.271 | −0.152 | −0.651 | 0.431 | 0.766∗ | 0.898∗ | 0.510 | 0.697 | 0.257 | 0.583 | −0.409 | — |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Condition | CD | ||||||||||||
| Cu ( | −0.110 | −0.528 | 0.855∗ | 0.251 | 0.022 | — | 0.686∗ | 0.797∗ | −0.048 | 0.369 | −0.692∗ | 0.219 | 0.715∗ |
| Zn ( | 0.015 | −0.693∗ | 0.423 | −0.046 | 0.030 | 0.686∗ | — | 0.554 | 0.236 | 0.177 | −0.273 | 0.192 | 0.598 |
| SOD (U/l) | −0.198 | −0.491 | 0.698∗ | 0.113 | −0.214 | 0.797∗ | 0.554 | — | 0.041 | −0.106 | −0.721∗ | 0.280 | 0.581 |
| CAT (U/l) | −0.168 | −0.250 | 0.138 | 0.001 | −0.073 | −0.048 | 0.236 | 0.041 | — | −0.167 | 0.070 | −0.007 | 0.127 |
| GSH + GSSG ( | −0.214 | −0.274 | 0.258 | −0.272 | −0.195 | 0.369 | 0.177 | −0.106 | −0.167 | — | 0.196 | −0.446 | 0.008 |
| MDA ( | 0.043 | 0.127 | −0.632∗ | −0.471 | −0.210 | −0.692∗ | −0.273 | −0.721∗ | 0.070 | 0.196 | — | −0.355 | −0.386∗ |
| LOOH ( | 0.792∗ | 0.299 | 0.084 | 0.320 | 0.627 | 0.219 | 0.192 | 0.280 | −0.007 | −0.446 | −0.355 | — | 0.299 |
| Cp ( | 0.117 | −0.456 | 0.604 | 0.219 | 0.137 | 0.715∗ | 0.598 | 0.581 | 0.127 | 0.008 | 0.528∗ | 0.299 | — |
∗ p<0.05.
Figure 1The mean values of LOOH concentrations (μmol/l) depending on the study group (UC, CD, and control group).
Figure 2Differences in LOOH (μmol/l) concentrations in the plasma of patients with CD and UC depending on gender.
Figure 3Differences in the concentration of LOOH (μmol/l) in the blood plasma of CD patients taking Imuran and those with CD and UC who did not take Imuran.
Figure 4Correlation of LOOH (μmol/l) with the level of leukocytes in patients with UC.
Figure 5Correlation of LOOH (μmol/l) with age in patients with CD.
Figure 6Correlation of LOOH (μmol/l) with MDA (μmol/l) in CD patients.