Eric J Jacobs1, Christina C Newton2, Ying Wang2, Peter T Campbell2, W Dana Flanders3, Susan M Gapstur2. 1. Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: Eric.Jacobs@cancer.org. 2. Behavioral and Epidemiology Research Group, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA. 3. Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Many cohort studies in the United States link with the National Death Index to detect deaths. Although linkage with National Death Index is relatively sensitive, some participant deaths will be missed. These participants continue to contribute person-time to the data set after their death, resulting in bias, which we refer to as ghost-time bias. We sought to evaluate the influence of ghost-time bias on mortality relative risk (RR) estimates. METHODS: Simulations were performed to determine the magnitude of ghost-time bias under a variety of plausible conditions. RESULTS: Our simulations demonstrate that ghost-time bias can be substantial, particularly among the elderly, where it can reverse the direction of the RR. For example, we conducted a simulation of a cohort of men beginning follow-up at age of 70 years, assuming 5% missed deaths and a true RR of 2.0. In this simulation, observed RRs were 1.89 during the year the cohort was aged 85 years, 1.60 during the year the cohort was aged 90 years, and 0.61 during the year the cohort was aged 95 years. We also provide results from actual cohort data that are consistent with ghost-time bias. CONCLUSIONS: Ghost-time bias may meaningfully affect mortality RR estimates under conditions that can plausibly occur in aging cohorts.
PURPOSE: Many cohort studies in the United States link with the National Death Index to detect deaths. Although linkage with National Death Index is relatively sensitive, some participant deaths will be missed. These participants continue to contribute person-time to the data set after their death, resulting in bias, which we refer to as ghost-time bias. We sought to evaluate the influence of ghost-time bias on mortality relative risk (RR) estimates. METHODS: Simulations were performed to determine the magnitude of ghost-time bias under a variety of plausible conditions. RESULTS: Our simulations demonstrate that ghost-time bias can be substantial, particularly among the elderly, where it can reverse the direction of the RR. For example, we conducted a simulation of a cohort of men beginning follow-up at age of 70 years, assuming 5% missed deaths and a true RR of 2.0. In this simulation, observed RRs were 1.89 during the year the cohort was aged 85 years, 1.60 during the year the cohort was aged 90 years, and 0.61 during the year the cohort was aged 95 years. We also provide results from actual cohort data that are consistent with ghost-time bias. CONCLUSIONS: Ghost-time bias may meaningfully affect mortality RR estimates under conditions that can plausibly occur in aging cohorts.
Authors: Qianyi Zhang; Anala Gossai; Shirley Monroe; Nathan C Nussbaum; Christina M Parrinello Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.402