Literature DB >> 30056578

Wild-derived mice: from genetic diversity to variation in immune responses.

Alexander Poltorak1,2, Svetlana Apalko3, Sergei Sherbak3,4.   

Abstract

Classical inbred mouse strains have historically been instrumental in mapping immunological traits. However, most of the classical strains originate from a relatively limited number of founder animals, largely within the Mus musculus domesticus subspecies. Therefore, their genetic diversity is ultimately limited. For this reason, it is not feasible to use these mice for exhaustive interrogation of immune signaling pathways. In order to investigate networks through forward genetic analysis, larger genetic diversity is required than is introduced under laboratory conditions. Recently, inbred strains from other mouse subspecies were established such as Mus musculus castaneus and Mus musculus musculus, which diverged from a shared common ancestor with Mus musculus domesticus more than one million years ago. A direct genomic comparison clearly demonstrates the evolutionary divergence that has occurred between wild-derived mice and the classical inbred strains. When compared to classical inbred strains, wild-derived mice exhibit polymorphisms every 100-200 base pairs. Studying the molecular basis of these traits provides us with insight into how the immune system can evolve regulatory features to accommodate environment-specific constraints. Because most wild-derived strains are able to breed with classical inbred mice, they represent a rich source of evolutionarily significant diversity for forward genetic studies. These organisms are an emerging, though still largely unexplored, model for the identification and study of novel immunological genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30056578     DOI: 10.1007/s00335-018-9766-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mamm Genome        ISSN: 0938-8990            Impact factor:   3.224


  66 in total

1.  Modifier screens in the mouse: time to move forward with reverse genetics.

Authors:  David J Curtis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Refinement of the genetics of the host response to Salmonella infection in MOLF/Ei: regulation of type 1 IFN and TRP3 pathways by Ity2.

Authors:  R Khan; V Sancho-Shimizu; C Prendergast; M-F Roy; J-C Loredo-Osti; D Malo
Journal:  Genes Immun       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.676

Review 3.  Genetic analysis of innate immunity.

Authors:  Kasper Hoebe; Zhengfan Jiang; Koichi Tabeta; Xin Du; Philippe Georgel; Karine Crozat; Bruce Beutler
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.543

Review 4.  Complete overview of protein-inactivating sequence variations in 36 sequenced mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  Steven Timmermans; Marc Van Montagu; Claude Libert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Functions of toll-like receptors: lessons from KO mice.

Authors:  Shizuo Akira; Kiyoshi Takeda
Journal:  C R Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.583

6.  Unique inbred strain MSM/Ms established from the Japanese wild mouse.

Authors:  Kazuo Moriwaki; Nobumoto Miyashita; Akihiko Mita; Hideo Gotoh; Kimiyuki Tsuchiya; Hideki Kato; Kazuyuki Mekada; Chikako Noro; Satoshi Oota; Atsushi Yoshiki; Yuichi Obata; Hiromichi Yonekawa; Toshihiko Shiroishi
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2009-04

Review 7.  Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model.

Authors:  Jean Louis Guénet; François Bonhomme
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 11.639

8.  Genetic and haplotype diversity among wild-derived mouse inbred strains.

Authors:  Folami Y Ideraabdullah; Elena de la Casa-Esperón; Timothy A Bell; David A Detwiler; Terry Magnuson; Carmen Sapienza; Fernando Pardo-Manuel de Villena
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Eleazar Eskin; Hyun Min Kang; Molly A Bogue; David A Hinds; Erica J Beilharz; Robert V Gupta; Julie Montgomery; Matt M Morenzoni; Geoffrey B Nilsen; Charit L Pethiyagoda; Laura L Stuve; Frank M Johnson; Mark J Daly; Claire M Wade; David R Cox
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Genetic studies of the susceptibility of classical and wild-derived inbred mouse strains to monkeypox virus.

Authors:  Patricia L Earl; Jeffrey L Americo; Bernard Moss
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  4 in total

1.  Chickens as a simple system for scientific discovery: The example of the MHC.

Authors:  Clive A Tregaskes; Jim Kaufman
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 2.  The Gut Microbiome and Substance Use Disorder.

Authors:  Jordan T Russell; Yanjiao Zhou; George M Weinstock; Jason A Bubier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.677

3.  Burkholderia pseudomallei invades the olfactory nerve and bulb after epithelial injury in mice and causes the formation of multinucleated giant glial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Heidi Walkden; Ali Delbaz; Lynn Nazareth; Michael Batzloff; Todd Shelper; Ifor R Beacham; Anu Chacko; Megha Shah; Kenneth W Beagley; Johana Tello Velasquez; James A St John; Jenny A K Ekberg
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2020-01-24

4.  Characterization of the blood-brain barrier in genetically diverse laboratory mouse strains.

Authors:  Johanna Schaffenrath; Sheng-Fu Huang; Tania Wyss; Mauro Delorenzi; Annika Keller
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2021-07-28
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.