Literature DB >> 30055693

Morphological and biometric features of preexisting posterior capsule defect in congenital cataract.

Zhangliang Li1, Pingjun Chang1, Dandan Wang1, Yinying Zhao1, Man Hu1, Xixia Ding1, Liuqing Yu1, Yune Zhao2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the diagnostic signs and biometric characteristics of preexisting posterior capsule defects in congenital cataract.
SETTING: Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
METHODS: Eyes with congenital cataract were reviewed and divided into a preexisting posterior capsule defect group (study group) and a control group with intact posterior capsules. Diagnostic signs were summarized on agreement of 3 ophthalmologists after they reviewed surgical videos. The biometric parameters, including central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, lens thickness, vitreous chamber depth, axial length, mean keratometry, corneal astigmatism, corneal diameter, and intraocular pressure, were compared between groups. The predictors of preexisting posterior capsule defect were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: The study comprised 81 eyes (53 patients). The diagnostic signs of preexisting posterior capsule defect included posterior capsule plaque with a well-demarcated margin, gray granules and vacuoles, and heterogeneous nuclear opacity (more dense in the posterior). The lens was significantly thinner in the study group than in the control group (P < .001). The corneal diameter was significantly smaller in the study group (P = .015 horizontal and P = .005 vertical). Multivariate analysis identified lens thickness as an independent predictor (odds ratio, 0.731; 95% confidence interval, 0.621-0.860; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: For preexisting posterior capsule defect, lens thickness was a valuable predictor and the presence of characteristic morphology was an important indicator. The cornea configuration suggests the need for further study of the role of genetic mutation.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30055693     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  5 in total

1.  Morphological changes in the iridocorneal angle and their relationship with intraocular pressure after infantile cataract surgery.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Wang; Zhang-Liang Li; Bing Zhang; Zi-Yi Lu; Wei-Chen Guan; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-09-18       Impact factor: 1.645

2.  Comparison of the Accuracy of IOL Power Calculation Formulas for Pediatric Eyes in Children of Different Ages.

Authors:  Jiaojiao Kou; Pingjun Chang; Lei Lin; Zhangliang Li; Yana Fu; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 3.  Commentary review: challenges of intraocular lens implantation for congenital cataract infants.

Authors:  Qi-Hui Zhao; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Safety in Congenital Cataract Eyes with Three Pathological Types of Posterior Capsule Abnormalities.

Authors:  Xixia Ding; Linfeng Xiang; Qianwei Wang; Dandan Wang; Pingjun Chang; Zhangliang Li; Yinying Zhao; Feixue Chu; Chao Ma; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Glaucoma and risk factors three years after congenital cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zuhui Zhang; Yana Fu; Jiajun Wang; Xinpei Ji; Zhangliang Li; Yinying Zhao; Pingjun Chang; Yun-E Zhao
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.209

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.