Rosario Touriño Peralba1, David Lamas-Francis2, Teresa Sarandeses-Diez2, Laura Martínez-Pérez2, Teresa Rodríguez-Ares2. 1. From the Cornea and Ocular Surface Unit (Touriño Peralba, Lamas-Francis, Sarandeses-Diez, Martínez-Pérez, Rodríguez-Ares), Ophthalmology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and the Surgery Department (Touriño Peralba, Rodríguez-Ares), Medical School, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. Electronic address: rtourinop@msn.com. 2. From the Cornea and Ocular Surface Unit (Touriño Peralba, Lamas-Francis, Sarandeses-Diez, Martínez-Pérez, Rodríguez-Ares), Ophthalmology Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela and the Surgery Department (Touriño Peralba, Rodríguez-Ares), Medical School, Santiago de Compostela University, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To describe the demographic data, evaluate the long-term refractive and anatomical outcomes, and report the incidence of complications of anterior iris (prepupillary) and posterior iris (retropupillary) fixation of the Artisan aphakia iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Patients who had iris-claw IOL implantation were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (prepupillary) and Group 2 (retropupillary). The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), anatomical changes, endothelial cell count (ECC), presence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and operative and postoperative complications were determined. RESULTS: The study comprised 95 eyes of 95 patients. Fifty-seven patients had prepupillary implantation and 38 patients had retropupillary implantation. Indications for surgery were IOL luxation or subluxation (n = 24), lens luxation or subluxation (n = 17), trauma (n = 15), aphakia (n = 30), and other (n = 9). The CDVA improved significantly in both groups and there were no differences between them. A significant ECC reduction was observed in both groups, with no differences between them. The incidence of CME was 16.1% (21.8% in the prepupillary group and 7.9% in the retropupillary group at 3 months and 8 months, respectively), although the difference was not statistically significant. Other postoperative complications were rare and no differences were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of location, the iris-claw IOL provided good visual outcomes with few complications. However, prepupillary IOL implantation seemed to contribute to greater endothelial cell loss and earlier onset of CME.
PURPOSE: To describe the demographic data, evaluate the long-term refractive and anatomical outcomes, and report the incidence of complications of anterior iris (prepupillary) and posterior iris (retropupillary) fixation of the Artisan aphakia iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS:Patients who had iris-claw IOL implantation were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (prepupillary) and Group 2 (retropupillary). The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), anatomical changes, endothelial cell count (ECC), presence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and operative and postoperative complications were determined. RESULTS: The study comprised 95 eyes of 95 patients. Fifty-seven patients had prepupillary implantation and 38 patients had retropupillary implantation. Indications for surgery were IOL luxation or subluxation (n = 24), lens luxation or subluxation (n = 17), trauma (n = 15), aphakia (n = 30), and other (n = 9). The CDVA improved significantly in both groups and there were no differences between them. A significant ECC reduction was observed in both groups, with no differences between them. The incidence of CME was 16.1% (21.8% in the prepupillary group and 7.9% in the retropupillary group at 3 months and 8 months, respectively), although the difference was not statistically significant. Other postoperative complications were rare and no differences were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of location, the iris-claw IOL provided good visual outcomes with few complications. However, prepupillary IOL implantation seemed to contribute to greater endothelial cell loss and earlier onset of CME.
Authors: Mario Damiano Toro; Antonio Longo; Teresio Avitabile; Katarzyna Nowomiejska; Caterina Gagliano; Sarah Tripodi; Tomasz Choragiewicz; Agnieszka Kaminska; Michele Figus; Chiara Posarelli; Matteo Forlini; Anselm Gerhard Maria Jünemann; Michele Reibaldi; Robert Rejdak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Islam Taher Ragab; Amr Mohammed Elsayed Abdelkader; Hanem Mohammad Kishk; Abdelmohsen Abdelghany Elshal Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2020-06-02