Literature DB >> 30055670

The problem with using the birthweight:placental weight ratio as a measure of placental efficiency.

Julian K Christians1, David Grynspan2, Susan L Greenwood3, Mark R Dilworth4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The ratio of birthweight to placental weight (BW:PW) is often used as a measure of placental efficiency in humans and animals. However, ratios have properties that are known to lead to spurious results. An alternative approach is the use of residuals from regression, which reflect whether birthweight is higher or lower than expected for a given placental weight, given the population pattern. We hypothesized that biologically meaningful measures of placental efficiency would differ between placentas with and without pathology, and between adverse and normal perinatal and postnatal outcomes.
METHODS: We examined associations between measures of placental efficiency (BW:PW ratio or residuals) and placental pathology, Apgar scores and infant death using National Collaborative Perinatal Project data (4645 preterm births and 28497 term births).
RESULTS: BW:PW ratios and residuals were significantly lower in placentas showing pathologies including signs of large infarcts or hemorrhage, although many of these differences were small. Low BW:PW ratios and residuals were also associated with low Apgar scores and increased risk of postnatal death. Whereas residuals were lower in term placentas that appeared immature by microscopic examination, the opposite was true for BW:PW ratios.
CONCLUSION: The BW:PW ratio produced an artefact whereby histologically less mature placentas at term appeared to be more "efficient" than mature placentas, illustrating a known problem with the use of ratios. For other traits, residuals generally showed differences between placentas with and without pathology that were as great as those seen with BW:PW ratios, and often showed stronger associations with adverse outcomes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birthweight; Efficiency; Outcome; Pathology; Placenta

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30055670     DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2018.06.311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Placenta        ISSN: 0143-4004            Impact factor:   3.481


  7 in total

1.  Placental metal concentrations in relation to placental growth, efficiency and birth weight.

Authors:  Tracy Punshon; Zhigang Li; Brian P Jackson; W Tony Parks; Megan Romano; David Conway; Emily R Baker; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Placental characteristics and risks of maternal mortality 50 years after delivery.

Authors:  E H Yeung; A Saha; C Zhu; M H Trinh; S N Hinkle; A Z Pollack; K L Grantz; J L Mills; S L Mumford; C Zhang; S L Robinson; M W Gillman; J Zhang; P Mendola; R Sundaram
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 3.  The Placenta's Role in Sexually Dimorphic Fetal Growth Strategies.

Authors:  Julian K Christians
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Prenatal choline supplementation during mouse pregnancy has differential effects in alcohol-exposed fetal organs.

Authors:  Sze Ting Cecilia Kwan; Dane K Ricketts; Brandon H Presswood; Susan M Smith; Sandra M Mooney
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.455

5.  Pregnancy complications recur independently of maternal vascular malperfusion lesions.

Authors:  Julian K Christians; Maria F Huicochea Munoz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Measuring intrauterine growth in healthy pregnancies using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ariunzaya Amgalan; Kushal Kapse; Dhineshvikram Krishnamurthy; Nicole R Andersen; Rima Izem; Ahmet Baschat; Jessica Quistorff; Alexis C Gimovsky; Homa K Ahmadzia; Catherine Limperopoulos; Nickie N Andescavage
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Maternal and Cord Blood Hemoglobin as Determinants of Placental Weight: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Ferrante S Gragasin; Maria B Ospina; Jesus Serrano-Lomelin; Su Hwan Kim; Matthew Kokotilo; Andrew G Woodman; Stephen J Renaud; Stephane L Bourque
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.