Literature DB >> 30055512

Which drivers are at risk? Factors that determine the profile of the reoffender driver.

Jose-Luis Padilla1, Pablo Doncel1, Andres Gugliotta1, Candida Castro2.   

Abstract

Finding appropriate assessment tools to predict recidivism is a difficult aim, which may lead to actions with unintended consequences. Aims don't have consequences. At times, the research has been used to justify penalising reoffenders with punitive measures rather than treating them with effective psychological interventions. This study aims to contribute to untangling and assessing the potential predictors of reoffender drivers. In this study, 296 drivers: 86 reoffenders (7 women and 79 men) and 206 non-reoffenders (105 women and 101 men) responded to a battery of assessment questionnaires in which they were asked for demographic data (i.e. gender and age), alcohol consumption habits, driving styles, general estimation of risk in everyday life, sensitivity to reward and punishment and anger while driving. The results provided a logistical regression model capable of predicting reoffending and explaining 34% of variability, successfully classifying 77.6% of participants. In this model, the best predictor of reoffending is higher consumption of alcohol (Alcohol Use Disorders, AUD), followed by incautious driving (since cautious driving style correlates negatively with reoffending) and to a lesser extent, infraestimation of recreational risk and a greater sensitivity to reward. Relying on results to predict recidivism could be important to plan better interventions to prevent it.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anger; Driving under the influence (DUI); Driving while intoxicated (DWI); Recidivist; Risk perception; Road safety; Sensitivity to punishment; Sensitivity to reward

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30055512     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Cortisol stress response predicts 9-year risky driving convictions in male first-time driving-while-impaired offenders.

Authors:  Thomas G Brown; Marie Claude Ouimet; Louise Nadeau; Jacques Tremblay; Christina Gianoulakis; Sophie Couture; Nathaniel Moxley-Kelly
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Trait driving anger and driving styles among Colombian professional drivers.

Authors:  Sergio A Useche; Boris Cendales; Francisco Alonso; Luis Montoro; Juan C Pastor
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-08-08

3.  Relationships between Personality Traits and Brain Gray Matter Are Different in Risky and Non-risky Drivers.

Authors:  Laura Mas-Cuesta; Sabina Baltruschat; Antonio Cándido; Andrés Catena
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.342

4.  Self-reported changes in aggressive driving within the past five years, and during COVID-19.

Authors:  Amanda N Stephens; Steven Trawley; Justin Ispanovic; Sophie Lowrie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Risky Decision-Making and Hazard Prediction are Negatively Related and Could Be Assessed Independently Using Driving Footage.

Authors:  Candida Castro; Petya Ventsislavova; Pedro Garcia-Fernandez; David Crundall
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2021-06-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.