Marie-Astrid Vinckx1, Inge Bossuyt2, Bernadette Dierckx de Casterlé3. 1. Department of Nursing, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Mechelen, Belgium. 2. Palliative Care Hospital Support Team, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: bernadette.dierckxdecasterle@kuleuven.be.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The international nursing shortage has implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Various studies report that nurses do not have time to complete all necessary nursing care tasks, potentially resulting in nurse-perceived time pressure. Providing good care in the current nursing environment often poses a real ethical challenge for nurses. How nurses experience caring for cancer patients under time pressure and how they deal with the limited time available in achieving an ethical nursing practice remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To report qualitative research grounded in oncology nurses' experiences with time pressure, its perceived impact on nursing care and the ways in which they deal with it. DESIGN: A qualitative study design with a grounded theory approach was conducted to explore and explain oncology nurses' experiences with time pressure and its underlying dynamics. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Purposive and theoretical sampling led to the inclusion of 14 nurses with diverse characteristics from five inpatient oncology nursing wards in one academic hospital. METHODS: Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted over a six-month period in 2015 and 2016. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously. The interview data was analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven and NVivo software. RESULTS: The conceptualised phenomenon of time pressure, grounded in empirical data, illuminated its complexity and helped us to explicate and describe what nurses felt when working under time pressure. The interviewed nurses described time pressure as a shared yet nuanced reality. We uncovered that nurses dealt with time pressure in varied ways, with a broad range of proactive and 'ad hoc' strategies. According to our interviewees, time pressure was a significant barrier in providing good nursing care. They illustrated how time pressure particularly affected the interactional aspects of care, which most nurses considered as essential in an oncology setting. Underlying personal, cultural and context-related factors seemed to play a key role in nurses' individual experiences with time pressure. CONCLUSION: Time pressure is a widely recognised and experienced phenomenon among nurses which has substantial negative implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Our findings reinforce the need to establish better support for nurses and to reduce the circumstances in which nurses are ethically challenged to provide good care due to time pressure. Based on our findings, we recommend investing more in the nursing culture and nurses' personal development, in addition to optimising nurse staffing levels.
BACKGROUND: The international nursing shortage has implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Various studies report that nurses do not have time to complete all necessary nursing care tasks, potentially resulting in nurse-perceived time pressure. Providing good care in the current nursing environment often poses a real ethical challenge for nurses. How nurses experience caring for cancerpatients under time pressure and how they deal with the limited time available in achieving an ethical nursing practice remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To report qualitative research grounded in oncology nurses' experiences with time pressure, its perceived impact on nursing care and the ways in which they deal with it. DESIGN: A qualitative study design with a grounded theory approach was conducted to explore and explain oncology nurses' experiences with time pressure and its underlying dynamics. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Purposive and theoretical sampling led to the inclusion of 14 nurses with diverse characteristics from five inpatient oncology nursing wards in one academic hospital. METHODS: Individual, semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted over a six-month period in 2015 and 2016. Data collection and analysis occurred simultaneously. The interview data was analysed using the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven and NVivo software. RESULTS: The conceptualised phenomenon of time pressure, grounded in empirical data, illuminated its complexity and helped us to explicate and describe what nurses felt when working under time pressure. The interviewed nurses described time pressure as a shared yet nuanced reality. We uncovered that nurses dealt with time pressure in varied ways, with a broad range of proactive and 'ad hoc' strategies. According to our interviewees, time pressure was a significant barrier in providing good nursing care. They illustrated how time pressure particularly affected the interactional aspects of care, which most nurses considered as essential in an oncology setting. Underlying personal, cultural and context-related factors seemed to play a key role in nurses' individual experiences with time pressure. CONCLUSION: Time pressure is a widely recognised and experienced phenomenon among nurses which has substantial negative implications for the quality and safety of patient care. Our findings reinforce the need to establish better support for nurses and to reduce the circumstances in which nurses are ethically challenged to provide good care due to time pressure. Based on our findings, we recommend investing more in the nursing culture and nurses' personal development, in addition to optimising nurse staffing levels.
Authors: Susann May; Franziska Gabb; Yuriy Ignatyev; Jana Ehrlich-Repp; Kerstin Stahlhut; Martin Heinze; Matthew Allsop; Henrikje Stanze; Felix Muehlensiepen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-05-20 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Yvonne Tran; Teresa Winata; Klay Lamprell; Diana Fajardo Pulido; Gaston Arnolda; Geoff P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Kylie Smith; Sandra Avery; Kim Rigg; Johanna Westbrook; Ian Olver; David Currow; Jonathan Karnon; Robyn L Ward; Jeffrey Braithwaite Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-02-12 Impact factor: 2.655