Catherine A Cluver1, Natalie J Hannan2, Erika van Papendorp3, Richard Hiscock4, Sally Beard2, Ben W Mol5, Gerhard B Theron3, David R Hall3, Eric H Decloedt6, Marietjie Stander7, Kim T Adams7, Megan Rensburg8, Pawel Schubert8, Susan P Walker2, Stephen Tong2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa; Translational Obstetrics Group, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: cathycluver@hotmail.com. 2. Translational Obstetrics Group, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Mercy Perinatal, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. 4. Department of Anaesthetics, University of Melbourne, Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 6. Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. 7. LCMS Central Analytical Facility and Department of Biochemistry, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa. 8. Division of Chemical Pathology, Stellenbosch University and National Health Laboratory Service, Cape Town, South Africa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Preterm preeclampsia has a high rate of fetal death or disability. There is no treatment to slow the disease, except delivery. Preclinical studies have identified proton pump inhibitors as a possible treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether esomeprazole could prolong pregnancy in women who have received a diagnosis of preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa. Women with preterm preeclampsia (gestational age 26 weeks+0 days to 31 weeks+6 days) were assigned randomly to 40-mg daily esomeprazole or placebo. The primary outcome was a prolongation of gestation of 5 days. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal outcomes. We compared circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction that was associated with preeclampsia and performed pharmacokinetic studies. RESULTS:Between January 2016 and April 2017, we recruited 120 participants. One participant was excluded because of incorrect randomization, which left 59 participants in the esomeprazole and 60 participants in the placebo group. Median gestational age at enrolment was 29+4 weeks gestation. There were no between-group differences in median time from randomization to delivery: 11.4 days (interquartile range, 3.6-19.7 days) in the esomeprazole group and 8.3 days (interquartile range, 3.8-19.6 days) in the placebo group (3 days longer in the esomeprazole arm; 95% confidence interval, -2.9-8.8; P=.31). There were no placental abruptions in the esomeprazole group and 6 (10%) in the placebo group (P=.01, P=.14 adjusted). There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes or markers of endothelial dysfunction. Esomeprazole and its metabolites were detected in maternal blood among those treated with esomeprazole, but only trace amounts in the umbilical cord blood. CONCLUSION:Daily esomeprazole (40 mg) did not prolong gestation in pregnancies with preterm preeclampsia or decrease circulating soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 concentrations. Higher levels in the maternal circulation may be needed for clinical effect.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Preterm preeclampsia has a high rate of fetal death or disability. There is no treatment to slow the disease, except delivery. Preclinical studies have identified proton pump inhibitors as a possible treatment. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether esomeprazole could prolong pregnancy in women who have received a diagnosis of preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a double-blind, randomized controlled trial at Tygerberg Hospital in South Africa. Women with preterm preeclampsia (gestational age 26 weeks+0 days to 31 weeks+6 days) were assigned randomly to 40-mg daily esomeprazole or placebo. The primary outcome was a prolongation of gestation of 5 days. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal outcomes. We compared circulating markers of endothelial dysfunction that was associated with preeclampsia and performed pharmacokinetic studies. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and April 2017, we recruited 120 participants. One participant was excluded because of incorrect randomization, which left 59 participants in the esomeprazole and 60 participants in the placebo group. Median gestational age at enrolment was 29+4 weeks gestation. There were no between-group differences in median time from randomization to delivery: 11.4 days (interquartile range, 3.6-19.7 days) in the esomeprazole group and 8.3 days (interquartile range, 3.8-19.6 days) in the placebo group (3 days longer in the esomeprazole arm; 95% confidence interval, -2.9-8.8; P=.31). There were no placental abruptions in the esomeprazole group and 6 (10%) in the placebo group (P=.01, P=.14 adjusted). There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes or markers of endothelial dysfunction. Esomeprazole and its metabolites were detected in maternal blood among those treated with esomeprazole, but only trace amounts in the umbilical cord blood. CONCLUSION: Daily esomeprazole (40 mg) did not prolong gestation in pregnancies with preterm preeclampsia or decrease circulating soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 concentrations. Higher levels in the maternal circulation may be needed for clinical effect.
Authors: Nir Melamed; Ahmet Baschat; Yoav Yinon; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Federico Mecacci; Francesc Figueras; Vincenzo Berghella; Amala Nazareth; Muna Tahlak; H David McIntyre; Fabrício Da Silva Costa; Anne B Kihara; Eran Hadar; Fionnuala McAuliffe; Mark Hanson; Ronald C Ma; Rachel Gooden; Eyal Sheiner; Anil Kapur; Hema Divakar; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Liran Hiersch; Liona C Poon; John Kingdom; Roberto Romero; Moshe Hod Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Date: 2021-03 Impact factor: 3.561
Authors: Catherine Cluver; Susan P Walker; Ben W Mol; David Hall; Richard Hiscock; Fiona C Brownfoot; Tu'uhevaha J Kaitu'u-Lino; Stephen Tong Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Lina Bergman; Karl Bergman; Eduard Langenegger; Ashley Moodley; Stephanie Griffith-Richards; Johan Wikström; David Hall; Lloyd Joubert; Philip Herbst; Sonja Schell; Teelkien van Veen; Michael Belfort; Stephen Y C Tong; Susan Walker; Roxanne Hastie; Catherine Cluver Journal: Cells Date: 2021-04-20 Impact factor: 6.600
Authors: Elizabeth Wastnedge; Donald Waters; Sarah R Murray; Brian McGowan; Effie Chipeta; Alinane Linda Nyondo-Mipando; Luis Gadama; Gladys Gadama; Martha Masamba; Monica Malata; Frank Taulo; Queen Dube; Kondwani Kawaza; Patricia Munthali Khomani; Sonia Whyte; Mia Crampin; Bridget Freyne; Jane E Norman; Rebecca M Reynolds Journal: J Glob Health Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 4.413