Literature DB >> 30054956

Involvement of calvarial stem cells in healing: A regional analysis of large cranial defects.

Emily L Durham1, R Nicole Howie1, Reed Houck1, Brayden Oakes1, Zachary Grey1, SarahRose Hall1, Martin Steed2, Amanda LaRue3,4, Robin Muise-Helmericks5, James Cray1,3,5,6.   

Abstract

Large craniofacial defects present a substantial clinical challenge that often requires the use of osteoconductive matrices and osteoinductive cues (i.e., bone morphogenetic proteins [BMP2]) to augment healing. While these methods have improved clinical outcomes, a better understanding of how the osteogenic fronts surrounding the defect, the underlying dura mater, and the cranial suture area contribute to healing may lead to more targeted therapies to enhance bone regeneration. We hypothesized that healing within a large bone defect will be precipitated from cells within the remaining or available suture mesenchyme abutting the edges of a murine critical sized defect. To investigate this hypothesis, 39 adult, wild-type mice were randomly arranged into groups (9 or 10 per group) by time (4 and 8 weeks) and treatment (control, acellular collagen sponge alone, or acellular collagen sponge loaded with a clinically relevant scaled dosage of BMP2). The skulls were then subjected to microcomputed tomography and histological analysis to assess bone regeneration in regions of interest within the defect area. A regional assessment of healing indicated that BMP2 drives greater healing than control and that healing emanates from the surgical margin, particularly from the margin associated with undisrupted suture mesenchyme. Though BMP2 treatment drove an increase in cell presence within the healing defect, there was no regional orientation of craniofacial stem cells or vascularity. Overall, these data reinforce that osteoconductive matrices in conjunction with osteoinductive peptides result in better healing of large calvarial defects. This healing is characterized as emanating from the surgical margin where there is an abundant supply of vasculature and progenitor cells.
© 2018 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30054956      PMCID: PMC6398939          DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  4 in total

1.  Sub-clinical dose of bone morphogenetic protein-2 does not precipitate rampant, sustained inflammatory response in bone wound healing.

Authors:  Zachary J Grey; R Nicole Howie; Emily L Durham; Sarah Rose Hall; Kristi L Helke; Martin B Steed; Amanda C LaRue; Robin C Muise-Helmericks; James J Cray
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 3.617

2.  Meckel's Cartilage in Mandibular Development and Dysmorphogenesis.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pitirri; Emily L Durham; Natalie A Romano; Jacob I Santos; Abigail P Coupe; Hao Zheng; Danny Z Chen; Kazuhiko Kawasaki; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Joan T Richtsmeier; Meng Wu; Susan M Motch Perrine
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  rhBMP2 alone does not induce macrophage polarization towards an increased inflammatory response.

Authors:  Emily L Durham; Rajiv Kishinchand; Zachary J Grey; James J Cray
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.407

4.  Optimizing bone wound healing using BMP2 with absorbable collagen sponge and Talymed nanofiber scaffold.

Authors:  Emily L Durham; R Nicole Howie; SarahRose Hall; Nicholas Larson; Brayden Oakes; Reed Houck; Zachary Grey; Martin Steed; Amanda C LaRue; Robin Muise-Helmericks; James Cray
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.531

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.