| Literature DB >> 30054444 |
Zahra Zendehbad1, Pantea Izadi1, Abdolreza Daraei2, Mir Saeed Yekaninejad3, Nahid Nafissi4, Nasim Younosi5, Ghasemali Khorasani6, Javad Tavakkoly Bazzaz1.
Abstract
Background: Young age at first full-term pregnancy (FFTP) is an important factor in breast cancer risk reduction. It is postulated that this protective effect is the result of stable molecular signatures imprinted by physiological process of pregnancy, but the molecular mechanism of this protective role is unclear. The aim of the current study was to identify the effect of early FFTP on methylation status of FOXA1 gene body. FOXA1 is an essential transcription factor for mammary gland development and estrogen responsiveness of breast tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Breast cancer; DNA methylation; Epigenetics; FOXA1; Pregnancy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30054444 PMCID: PMC6707108
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran Biomed J ISSN: 1028-852X
Primer sequences for real-time PCR
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| F: 5'- CAGGTCGGGCATTATCCAC-3' | 175 |
|
| F: 5'- CCACATCGCTCAGACACCAT-3' | 144 |
|
| F: 5'-GTCCATAGGTGATTTGCTCTATCA-3' | 168 |
Fig. 1Melting curves analysis for (A) GAPDH, H19 and (B) FOXA1 after real-time PCR
Fig. 2Standard curve for (A) H19 (methylated control gene), (B) GAPDH (un-methylated control gene), and (C) FOXA1 (target gene) real-time PCR assay for evaluating the reaction efficiency by serial dilutions of DNA (the reaction efficiency was acceptable)
Comparison of mean ∆ct values of control gene (H19) against unmethylated control gene (GAPDH) and target gene (FOXA1) against methylated control gene (H19)
| Study |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parous (n = 24) | -9.63 | 0.88 | 4.15 | 2.98 |
| Nulliparous (n = 27) | -7.94 | 0.66 | 6.18 | 3.96 |
In MeDIP technique for each reaction, DNA was sonicated into fragments ranging in size from 200-1000 bp and was divided into immunoprecipitated (IP) and input (IN) portions.
Fig. 3Graphical representation of FOXA1 primers position. Primers are located in intron1 (reverse strand; +73 to +2262 relative to TSS). Amplified part contains eight gene body CpG sites (+1877, +1894, +1903, +1934, +1941, +1956, +1993, and +2002 relative to TSS)[17]. The two CPG islands sequences were extracted from University of California, Santa Cruz UCSC. TSS, transcription start site; E, exon
Relative methylation levels among subgroups of study
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| Parity status | ||||
| Early parous | 24 (47) | 0.53 | 0.19-1.6 |
|
| Age (year) | ||||
| <40 | 41 (80) | 0.38 | 0.13-0.91 | 0.79 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||||
| <25 | 24 (47.06) | 0.46 | 0.16-0.84 | 0.44 |
| Breastfeeding duration (month) | ||||
| Non-breastfed | 2 (8.33) | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.11 |
| Number of full term pregnancies | ||||
| 1 delivery | 11 (45.83) | 0.54 | 0.21-2.06 | 0.56 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Yes | 10 (19.6) | 0.30 | 0.16-1.15 | 0.66 |
p value in bold represents a significant difference in the methylation level of the target regions between/among subgroups. Q: interquartile range
Fig 4Comparison of FOXA1 gene body methylation between parous and nulliparous groups. FOXA1 methylation was significantly higher in parous group compared with nulliparous (p = 0.041)