Pelayia H Soto1, Nicole E Reid1, Toby L Litovitz2. 1. National Capital Poison Center, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States. 2. National Capital Poison Center, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, The George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States; Department of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: toby@poison.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: New strategies recently proposed to mitigate injury caused by lithium coin cell batteries lodged in the esophagus include prehospital administration of honey to coat the battery and prevent local hydroxide generation and in-hospital administration of sucralfate suspension (or honey). This study was undertaken to define the safe interval for administering coating agents by identifying the timing of onset of esophageal perforations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 290 fatal or severe battery ingestions with esophageal lodgment was undertaken to identify cases with esophageal perforations. RESULTS: Esophageal perforations were identified in 189 cases (53 fatal, 136 severe; 95.2% in children ≤4 years). Implicated batteries were predominantly lithium (91.0%) and 92.0% were ≥20 mm diameter. Only 2% of perforations occurred in <24 h following ingestion, including 3 severe cases with perforations evident at 11-17 h, 12 h, and 18 h. Another 7.4% of perforations (11 cases) became evident 24 to 47 h post ingestion and 10.1% of perforations (15 cases) became evident 48 to 71 h post ingestion. By 3 days post ingestion, 26.8% of perforations were evident, 36.9% by 4 days, 46.3% by 5 days, and 66.4% by 9 days. CONCLUSION: Esophageal perforation is unlikely in the 12 h after battery ingestion, therefore the administration of honey or sucralfate carries a low risk of extravasation from the esophagus. This first 12 h includes the period of peak electrolysis activity and battery damage, thus the risk of honey or sucralfate is low while the benefit is likely high.
INTRODUCTION: New strategies recently proposed to mitigate injury caused by lithium coin cell batteries lodged in the esophagus include prehospital administration of honey to coat the battery and prevent local hydroxide generation and in-hospital administration of sucralfate suspension (or honey). This study was undertaken to define the safe interval for administering coating agents by identifying the timing of onset of esophageal perforations. METHODS: A retrospective study of 290 fatal or severe battery ingestions with esophageal lodgment was undertaken to identify cases with esophageal perforations. RESULTS: Esophageal perforations were identified in 189 cases (53 fatal, 136 severe; 95.2% in children ≤4 years). Implicated batteries were predominantly lithium (91.0%) and 92.0% were ≥20 mm diameter. Only 2% of perforations occurred in <24 h following ingestion, including 3 severe cases with perforations evident at 11-17 h, 12 h, and 18 h. Another 7.4% of perforations (11 cases) became evident 24 to 47 h post ingestion and 10.1% of perforations (15 cases) became evident 48 to 71 h post ingestion. By 3 days post ingestion, 26.8% of perforations were evident, 36.9% by 4 days, 46.3% by 5 days, and 66.4% by 9 days. CONCLUSION: Esophageal perforation is unlikely in the 12 h after battery ingestion, therefore the administration of honey or sucralfate carries a low risk of extravasation from the esophagus. This first 12 h includes the period of peak electrolysis activity and battery damage, thus the risk of honey or sucralfate is low while the benefit is likely high.
Authors: Elizabeth M Sinclair; Maneesha Agarwal; Matthew T Santore; Cary G Sauer; Erica L Riedesel Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 1.602
Authors: Elizabeth M Sinclair; Matthew T Santore; Maneesha Agarwal; Jamie Kitzman; Cary G Sauer; Erica L Riedesel Journal: J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 2.839
Authors: Cristina Lorenzo; Sara Azevedo; João Lopes; Ana Fernandes; Helena Loreto; Paula Mourato; Ana Isabel Lopes Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-04-27 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Rishabh Sethia; Hannah Gibbs; Ian N Jacobs; James S Reilly; Keith Rhoades; Kris R Jatana Journal: Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Date: 2021-04-15