| Literature DB >> 30053914 |
Iman Alikhani1, Kai Noponen2, Arto Hautala2, Rahel Ammann3, Tapio Seppänen2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We study the estimation of breathing frequency (BF) derived from wearable single-channel ECG signal in the context of mobile daily life activities. Although respiration effects on heart rate variability and ECG morphology have been well established, studies on ECG-derived respiration in daily living settings are scarce; possibly due to considerable amount of disturbances in such data. Yet, unobtrusive BF estimation during everyday activities can provide vital information for both disease management and athletic performance optimization. METHOD AND DATA: For robust ECG-derived BF estimation, we combine the respiratory information derived from R-R interval (RRI) variability and morphological scale variation of QRS complexes (MSV), acquired from ECG signals. Two different fusion techniques are applied on MSV and RRI signals: cross-power spectral density (CPSD) estimation and power spectrum multiplication (PSM). The algorithms were tested on large sets of data collected from 67 participants during office, household and sport activities, simulating daily living activities. We use spirometer reference BF to evaluate and compare our estimations made by different models. RESULTS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Breathing rate estimation; ECG morphology; Heart rate variability; Single-channel ECG; Time–frequency analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053914 PMCID: PMC6062885 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0533-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Derived signals from ECG, potentially containing respiratory frequency information. The first row is a 30-s ECG signal and in the next rows corresponding RRI and MSV signals are depicted, respectively
Fig. 2Preprocessed signals plus the representation of them and their fusions. This figure shows an epoch of the time series, RRI and MSV after preprocessing in the first and second top sub-figures. Assuming RRI and MSV signals as x and y, time–frequency representations of x and y are depicted in the third and fourth sub-figures ( and , respectively). Normalized squared magnitude of CPSD () is represented in the second last sub-figure. The last spectrogram is the normalized spectral multiplication of MSV and RRI ( ). states as Z-score column-wise normalization. The dashed lines over the time–frequency representations are the reference BF
General characteristics of participants
| Characteristic | Mean | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height (cm) | 175 | 160 | 195 |
| Weight (kg) | 75.4 | 45.6 | 122.8 |
| Age (years) | 37.9 | 18 | 60 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.51 | 14.72 | 35.5 |
Table of exercise intensity
| Activity protocol | Mean | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| Office work | 45 | 28 | 66 |
| Emotional stress | 43 | 26 | 73 |
| Floor sweeping | 52 | 35 | 73 |
| Tidying up | 54 | 38 | 75 |
| Table cleaning | 50 | 34 | 77 |
| Walking | 52 | 36 | 74 |
| Cycling | 66 | 48 | 83 |
| Running | 75 | 48 | 91 |
Mean intensity of activity protocols as a percentage of
Fig. 3Bland–Altman plot of a sample estimation. The BF estimation performance of a sample time series illustrated as Bland–Altman plot. The thick dashed line indicates the mean deviation value () and the solid lines represent . In this sample, and
Table of results
| Activity protocol |
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Office work | 13.09 | 7.82 |
|
| 16.48 | 11.56 | 14.08 | 12.21 |
| Emotional stress | 13.62 | 10.98 |
|
| 16.47 | 11.67 | 16.70 | 14.42 |
| Floor sweeping | 13.43 | 11.08 |
|
| 22.17 | 15.77 | 18.75 | 11.57 |
| Tidying up | 17.96 | 13.74 |
|
| 25.37 | 17.94 | 21.25 | 14.18 |
| Table cleaning | 16.91 | 13.01 |
|
| 22.21 | 15.82 | 18.51 | 12.33 |
| Walking | 11.31 | 11.31 |
|
| 17.35 | 15.99 | 23.00 | 16.95 |
| Cycling | 8.10 | 9.44 |
|
| 21.35 | 16.97 | 10.10 | 11.71 |
| Running | 15.59 | 19.17 |
|
| 28.20 | 24.06 | 25.16 | 25.30 |
| Average | 13.75 | 12.06 |
|
| 21.20 | 16.22 | 18.44 | 14.83 |
The performance of RRI spectral-based () and MSV spectral-based () BF estimation as well as fusion methods, including CPSD-based () and spectral multiplication ( ) BF estimation over the protocols. For each method, average and is reported and the lowest error in each protocol is written in italics