| Literature DB >> 30053889 |
Gilda Salerno1, Manuela Ceccarelli2, Chiara de Waure3, Marianna D'Andrea3, Danilo Buonsenso1, Valerio Faccia4, Davide Pata1, Piero Valentini5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Predictors of hypovitaminosis D were extensively studied in the adult population, leading to an approximately complete understanding of them, while there is a lack of studies in the pediatric population, especially in migrant and internationally adopted children. In this retrospective study, we tried to identify the major laboratory predictors of hypovitaminosis D in a cohort of internationally adopted children.Entities:
Keywords: Internationally adopted children; Parathormone; Rickets; Vitamin D deficiency
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053889 PMCID: PMC6062984 DOI: 10.1186/s13052-018-0527-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Pediatr ISSN: 1720-8424 Impact factor: 2.638
Characteristics of the population included in the study
|
| 859 | 100% |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Male | 483 | 56.2% |
| Female | 376 | 43.8% |
|
| ||
| Europe and Russian federation | 256 | 29.8% |
| Latin America | 231 | 26.9% |
| Asia and Indian subcontinent | 223 | 26.0% |
| Africa | 149 | 17.3% |
|
| ||
| Tropical | 438 | 51.0% |
| Sub-tropical | 166 | 19.3% |
| Temperate | 255 | 29.7% |
|
| ||
| Foster home | 70 | 8.5% |
| Foster family | 65 | 7.9% |
| Institute | 693 | 80.6% |
|
| 3.00 years | SD ± 2.03 years |
|
| ||
| Very fair/Fair | 290 | 33.8% |
| Intermediate | 340 | 39.6% |
| Olive/Brown | 229 | 26.7% |
|
| 109 cm | SD ± 21 cm |
|
| 19.93 kg | SD ± 9.02 kg |
|
| 16.0 | SD ± 2.28 |
|
| ||
| Obese | 59 | 8.4% |
| Overweight | 67 | 9.6% |
| Normal | 536 | 76.7% |
| Underweight | 37 | 5.3% |
|
| 5.31 years | SD ± 2.92 years |
|
| 5.61 years | SD ± 2.97 years |
|
| 0.33 years | SD ± 0.44 years |
|
| ||
| Spring | 191 | 22.2% |
| Summer | 149 | 17.3% |
| Fall | 259 | 30.2% |
| Winter | 260 | 30.3% |
|
| 21.04 ng/mL | SD ± 11.15 ng/mL |
|
| ||
| Severe Vitamin D Deficiency (< 10 ng/mL) | 107 | 12.5% |
| Moderate Vitamin D Deficiency (10–20 ng/mL) | 348 | 40.5% |
| Mild Vitamin D Deficiency (20–30 ng/mL) | 276 | 32.1% |
| Normal Vitamin D (> 30 ng/mL) | 128 | 14.9% |
|
| 32.24 pg/mL | SD ± 15.56 ng/mL |
|
| ||
| Increased (> 65 pg/mL) | 24 | 2.8% |
| Normal (10–65 pg/mL) | 795 | 96.7% |
| Decreased (< 10 pg/mL) | 3 | 0.4% |
|
| 385.01 IU/L | SD ± 299.27 IU/L |
|
| ||
| Increased | 201 | 24.2% |
| Normal | 630 | 75.8% |
|
| 9.94 mg/dL | SD ± 0.45 mg/dL |
|
| ||
| Increased | 18 | 2.2% |
| Normal | 803 | 97.5% |
| Decreased | 3 | 0.4% |
|
| 4.86 | mg/dL |
|
| ||
| Increased | 46 | 5.7% |
| Normal | 731 | 89.9% |
| Decreased | 36 | 4.4% |
BMI body mass index, PTH Parathyroid hormone, ALP Alkaline phosphatase, Ca Serum calcium, P Serum phosphates
Vitamin D status and characteristics of the population
| Vitamin D Status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Sex | Male | 49 (10.1%) | 211 (43.7%) | 149 (30.9%) | 74 (15.3%) | 0.043 |
| Female | 58 (15.4%) | 137 (36.4%) | 127 (33.8%) | 54 (14.4%) | ||
| BMI category | Underweight | 2 (5.4%) | 17 (45.9%) | 14 (37.8%) | 4 (10.8%) | 0.521 |
| Normal weight | 78 (14.5%) | 235 (43.8%) | 160 (29.9%) | 63 (11.8%) | ||
| Overweight | 11 (16.4%) | 21 (31.3%) | 26 (38.8%) | 9 (13.4%) | ||
| Obese | 7 (11.9%) | 29 (49.1%) | 18 (30.5%) | 5 (8.5%) | ||
| Skin color | Very fair/fair | 36 (12.4%) | 115 (39.7%) | 98 (33.8%) | 41 (14.1%) | < 0.001 |
| Intermediate | 26 (7.6%) | 128 (37.7%) | 121 (35.6%) | 65 (19.1%) | ||
| Olive/Brown | 45 (19.6%) | 105 (45.9%) | 57 (24.9%) | 22 (9.6%) | ||
χ2-test was used to determine statistically significant relationships among categorical variables
Bonferroni-adjusted P value was uses to determine if there were statistically significant differences among groups
VDD Vitamin D Deficiency; VD Vitamin D; BMI Body Mass Index
Vitamin D status and mean time from the arrival to 1st evaluation, age at the arrival and age at 1st evaluation
| Vitamin D Status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Time from the arrival in Italy to 1st evaluation | 0.32 ± 0.47 | 0.34 ± 0.41 | 0.32 ± 0.47 | 0.32 ± 0.47 | 0.912 |
| Age at the arrival in Italy | 6.31 ± 2.84 | 5.71 ± 2.77 | 5.09 ± 2.79 | 3.86 ± 3.07 | < 0.001 |
| Age at 1st evaluation | 6.69 ± 2.85 | 6.03 ± 2.79 | 5.36 ± 2.77 | 4.11 ± 3.15 | < 0.001 |
ANOVA test was used to determine statistical significance
Age at the arrival in Italy in years (Mean ± standard deviation) per Vitamin D status
| Vitamin D status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Sex |
| 6.15 ± 2.77 | 5.50 ± 2.75 | 4.91 ± 2.59 | 3.74 ± 2.75 |
|
| 6.44 ± 2.92 | 6.06 ± 2.78 | 5.32 ± 3.01 | 4.02 ± 3.49 | |
| Macro-area |
| 5.18 ± 2.48 | 4.85 ± 2.19 | 4.24 ± 2.51 | 3.16 ± 2.64 |
|
| 6.16 ± 2.84 | 5.80 ± 2.71 | 5.28 ± 2.43 | 4.88 ± 3.40 | |
|
| 6.32 ± 2.99 | 4.14 ± 2.15 | 3.25 ± 2.39 | 1.82 ± 1.29 | |
|
| 8.08 ± 2.37 | 7.16 ± 2.80 | 6.99 ± 2.37 | 6.31 ± 2.68 | |
| Season at blood draw |
| 6.46 ± 2.83 | 6.09 ± 2.85 | 3.87 ± 2.49 | 2.44 ± 1.95 |
|
| 5.77 ± 3.22 | 5.24 ± 2.61 | 4.62 ± 2.59 | 4.55 ± 3.73 | |
|
| 5.70 ± 2.96 | 5.57 ± 2.61 | 5.59 ± 2.72 | 3.85 ± 2.59 | |
|
| 6.46 ± 2.85 | 5.70 ± 2.90 | 5.59 ± 2.99 | 2.68 ± 3.86 | |
| Housing solution |
| 7.37 ± 3.55 | 6.73 ± 2.86 | 6.62 ± 2.67 | 4.64 ± 2.78 |
|
| 8.86 ± 2.96 | 6.81 ± 3.18 | 5.40 ± 2.43 | 6.79 ± 4.26 | |
|
| 6.09 ± 2.85 | 5.73 ± 2.79 | 4.88 ± 2.78 | 3.57 ± 3.07 | |
| BMI Status |
| 2.87 ± 0.49 | 5.07 ± 2.00 | 5.17 ± 2.03 | 5.76 ± 5.99 |
|
| 6.44 ± 2.56 | 6.08 ± 2.63 | 5.66 ± 2.39 | 5.42 ± 2.76 | |
|
| 7.75 ± 3.01 | 6.65 ± 2.64 | 5.99 ± 2.41 | 4.18 ± 2.07 | |
|
| 6.71 ± 3.44 | 6.28 ± 2.26 | 7.19 ± 2.81 | 6.56 ± 2.12 | |
VDD Vitamin D Deficiency, BMI Body Mass Index
Fig. 1Vitamin D status in relation to internationally adopted children mean age. Vitamin D status seems to be inversely related to internationally adopted children mean age. As a matter of fact, in our cohort a worst status can be observed in older children
Fig. 2Mean 25(OH)Vitamin D values in children younger than 1 year of age per macroarea of origin. We observed higher Vitamin D values in children < 1 yo who came from Africa and Asia, compared with those coming from Europe. In our cohort, no children were internationally adopted from Latin America when younger than 1 year of age
Vitamin D status, geographical origin and social environment
| Vitamin D Status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Macro-area |
| 24 (16.1%) | 68 (45.6%) | 39 (26.2%) | 18 (12.1%) | < 0.001 |
|
| 31 (12.1%) | 103 (40.2%) | 85 (33.2%) | 37 (14.5%) | ||
|
| 34 (14.2%) | 67 (30.1%) | 73 (32.7%) | 49 (22.0%) | ||
|
| 18 (7.8%) | 110 (47.6%) | 79 (34.2%) | 24 (10.4%) | ||
| Climatic zone |
| 31 (12.2%) | 102 (40.0%) | 85 (33.3%) | 37 (14.5%) | 0.002 |
|
| 34 (20.5%) | 68 (41.0%) | 52 (31.3%) | 12 (7.2%) | ||
|
| 42 (9.7%) | 178 (40.6%) | 139 (31.7%) | 79 (18.0%) | ||
| Housing solution |
| 8 (11.4%) | 24 (34.4%) | 19 (27.1%) | 19 (27.1%) | 0.008 |
|
| 6 (9.2%) | 37 (56.9%) | 18 (27.7%) | 4 (6.2%) | ||
|
| 90 (13.0%) | 275 (39.7%) | 227 (32.8%) | 101 (14.5%) | ||
| Season of first blood draw |
| 29 (15.2%) | 94 (49.2%) | 50 (26.2%) | 18 (9.4%) | < 0.001 |
|
| 3 (2.8%) | 41 (38.3%) | 56 (52.3%) | 49 (45.8%) | ||
|
| 18 (6.9%) | 101 (39.0%) | 103 (39.8%) | 37 (14.3%) | ||
|
| 57 (21.9%) | 112 (43.1%) | 67 (25.8%) | 24 (9.2%) | ||
χ2-test was used to determine statistically significant relationships among categorical variables
Vitamin D status and its relations with PTH status, ALP status, Ca status and P status
| Vitamin D Status | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| PTH status | 94 (11.8%) | 323 (40.6%) | 262 (33.0%) | 116 (14.6%) | 0.086 | |
| 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
| 3 (12.5%) | 14 (58.3%) | 3 (12.5%) | 4 (16.7%) | |||
| ALP status |
| 69 (10.9%) | 259 (41.1%) | 218 (34.7%) | 84 (13.3%) | 0.001 |
|
| 34 (16.9%) | 76 (37.8%) | 49 (24.4%) | 42 (20.9%) | ||
| Ca status | 100 (12.5%) | 324 (40.3%) | 261 (32.5%) | 84 (13.3%) | 0.296 | |
| 0 (0.0%) | 3 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |||
| 1 (5.6%) | 5 (27.8%) | 8 (44.4%) | 4 (22.2%) | |||
| P status |
| 84 (11.5%) | 293 (40.1%) | 249 (34.1%) | 105 (14.3%) | 0.014 |
|
| 4 (11.1%) | 16 (44.5%) | 7 (19.4%) | 9 (25.0%) | ||
|
| 12 (26.1%) | 20 (43.5%) | 11 (23.9%) | 3 (6.5%) | ||
χ2-test was used to determine statistically significant relationships among categorical variables
a Normal values, depending on the date of the blood draw and the age/sex of the patient, are accurately described within the section “Subjects and Methods”;
b Normal values, depending on the age of the patient, are accurately described within the section “Subjects and Methods”
Biochemical rickets: number of children affected and 25(OH)D mean values
| P status | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
| Vitamin D Status |
|
| 26 (7.20 ± 1.46 ng/mL) | 2 (6.65 ± 0.92 ng/mL) | 129 |
|
| 0 | 0 | |||
|
|
| 59 (15.30 ± 2.93 ng/mL) | 1 (15.00 ± NA ng/mL) | ||
|
| 1 (17.70 ± NA ng/mL) | 0 | |||
|
|
| 40 (24.96 ± 2.89 ng/mL) | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | |||
ALP Alkaline phosphatase; Ca Serum calcium; P Serum phosphate; 25-OH-D 25-hydroxylate-Vitamin D
a Normal values, depending on the date of the blood draw and the age/sex of the patient, are accurately described within the section “Subjects and Methods”;
b Normal values, depending on the age of the patient, are accurately described within the section “Subjects and Methods”
c Normal values can be found in Table 3 and within the section “Subjects and Methods”
Multiple logistic regression results: showing predictors of developing Vitamin D Deficiency through Odds Ratios (ORs), 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) and statistical significance of variables (p value)
| Variable | Value | OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skin color |
| |||
|
| 1.014 | 0.590–1.743 | 0.96 | |
|
| 2.387 | 1.261–4.519 | 0.08 | |
| Season at 1st evaluation |
| |||
|
| 0.207 | 0.104–0.410 | < 0.001 | |
|
| 0.726 | 0.362–1.455 | 0.366 | |
|
| 1.000 | 0.485–2.063 | 1.000 | |
| Housing solution |
| |||
|
| 0.252 | 0.125–0.507 | < 0.001 | |
|
| 3.971 | 1.971–8.001 | < 0.001 | |
| ALP status |
| |||
|
| 0.560 | 0.338–0.930 | 0.025 | |
| Age at 1st evaluation |
| 1.238 | 1.140–1.345 | < 0.001 |
ALP Alkaline phosphatase
a Normal values are extensively described in the “Subjects and methods” section
Fig. 3Risk of finding a vitamin D (VDD) deficiency according to season of blood draw. When using spring as a baseline, the only significative association is a lower risk of finding a VDD when the blood draw is performed during summer. Autumn is associated with a non-significant slightly lower risk, while Winter with a non-significant slightly higher risk