| Literature DB >> 30053884 |
Miriam Serrano1, Iker A Sevilla1, Miguel Fuertes1, Mariví Geijo1, Maria Ángeles Risalde2,3, Jose Francisco Ruiz-Fons2, Christian Gortazar2, Ramón A Juste1,4, Lucas Domínguez5, Natalia Elguezabal1, Joseba M Garrido6.
Abstract
Animal tuberculosis (TB) remains a major problem in some countries despite the existence of control programmes focused mainly on cattle. In this species, aerogenous transmission is accepted as the most frequent infection route, affecting mainly the respiratory system. Under the hypothesis that the oral route could be playing a more relevant role in transmission, diagnosis and disease persistence than previously thought, this study was performed to assess the course of TB infection in cattle and its effects on diagnosis depending on the route of entry of Mycobacterium bovis. Two groups of five calves each were either endotracheally (EC) or orally (OC) challenged. Necropsies were carried out 12 weeks after challenge except for three OC calves slaughtered 8 weeks later. All animals reacted to the tuberculin skin test and the entire EC group was positive to the interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) 2 weeks after challenge and thereafter. The first positive IGRA results for OC calves (3/5) were recorded 4 weeks after challenge. Group comparison revealed significant differences in lesion and positive culture location and scoring. TB-compatible gross lesions and positive cultures were more frequently found in the thorax (p < 0.001) and lung (p < 0.05) of EC animals, whereas OC animals presented lesions (p = 0.23) and positive cultures (p < 0.05) mainly located in the abdomen. These results indicate that the infection route seems to be a determining factor for both the distribution and the time needed for the development of visible lesions. Our study suggests that confirmation of TB infection in some skin reactor animals can be problematic if current post-mortem examination and diagnostics are not improved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053884 PMCID: PMC6064182 DOI: 10.1186/s13567-018-0566-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Res ISSN: 0928-4249 Impact factor: 3.683
Results for IGRA and skin tuberculin tests performed
| Group | ID | IGRA test | Skin test | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weeks after challenge | Δ (mm) skin thickness | Interpretation | ||||||||||
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 20 | PPD-A | PPD-B | PPD-B–PPD-A | SIT | CIT | ||
| EC | 1 | N | P | P | P | P | — | 1 | 5 | 4 | P | I |
| 2 | N | P | P | P | P | — | 1 | 12 | 11 | P | P | |
| 3 | N | P | P | P | Na | — | 1 | 8 | 7 | P | P | |
| 4 | N | P | P | P | P | — | 0 | 9 | 9 | P | P | |
| 5 | N | P | P | P | P | — | 2 | 9 | 7 | P | P | |
| OC | 6 | N | N | N | P | P | — | 3 | 16 | 13 | P | P |
| 7 | N | N | N | P | Nb | — | 9 | 22 | 13 | P | P | |
| 8 | N | N | P | P | Nc | P | 3 | 10 | 7 | P | P | |
| 9 | N | N | P | P | P | P | 2 | 8 | 6 | P | P | |
| 10 | N | N | P | P | P | P | 5 | 17 | 12 | P | P | |
SIT: Single Intradermal Test, CIT: Comparative Intradermal Test, EC: endotracheally challenged, OC: orally challenged, Δ: increase, A-PPD: avian PPD, B-PPD: bovine PPD, P: positive, I: inconclusive, N: negative.
a IDscreen S/P% = 28.06.
b IDscreen S/P% = 20.17.
c IDscreen S/P% = 22.26.
—: these animals were necropsied 12 weeks after challenge. The remaining three were tested for IGRA once more before being necropsied 20 weeks after challenge.
Distribution and score of confirmed tuberculous lesions in the tissues of the studied groups
One LN affected (right or left): oblique lines; two LN affected (both right and left or two of three, cranial, caudal, or medial): vertical lines; three LN affected (cranial, caudal, and medial): horizontal lines. Total Lesion score is the sum of the scores of all tissues per animal.
R: right, L: left, EC: endotracheally challenged, OC: oral challenged, AC: after challenge, LN: lymph node.
Figure 1Tuberculous lesion scores in challenged calves. Dot plot representing lesion score distribution in head, thorax, lung, abdomen and total (sum of all areas) for each animal. Horizontal lines show the median values. Significant differences were found in the thorax (p < 0.001) and lung (p < 0.05). EC: endotracheally challenged, OC: orally challenged.
Distribution of . positive cultures and culture scores in the tissues of each group
MGIT culture positive: oblique lines; solid culture positive: vertical lines; both MGIT and solid culture positive: horizontal lines. Culture score is the sum of the scores of all tissues per animal.
R: right, L: left, EC: endotracheally challenged, OC: oral challenged, AC: after challenge, LN: lymph node.
Figure 2Culture scores in challenged calves. Dot plot representing culture score distribution in head, thorax, lung, abdomen and total (sum of all areas) for each animal. Horizontal lines show the median values. Significant differences were found in the thorax (p < 0.05). EC: endotracheally challenged, OC: orally challenged.