| Literature DB >> 30053874 |
Yang Cheng1,2, Bo Wang2,3, Feng Lu2,4, Jin-Hee Han2, Md Atique Ahmed2, Eun-Taek Han5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The development of an effective malarial vaccine is an urgent need. Most glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins of Plasmodium parasites are exposed to neutralizing antibodies, and several are advanced vaccine candidates. In the present study, Plasmodium vivax Pv32 (PVX_084815) as a hypothetical, predicted GPI-anchored and cysteine-rich motif was identified from our previous findings with a focus on its antigenic profiling. The orthologue gene pv32, a predicted GPI anchor of P. falciparum PF3D7_1434400, has still not been well studied.Entities:
Keywords: Immune response; Merozoite surface protein; Plasmodium vivax; Predicted GPI-anchored protein; Pv32
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053874 PMCID: PMC6062930 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2401-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Malar J ISSN: 1475-2875 Impact factor: 2.979
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of Pv32, recombinant Pv32 protein expression and immunization. a Schematic diagram of Pv32. The Pv32 protein comprises 287 amino acids, with a calculated molecular mass of 32 kDa. The signal peptide (amino acid [aa] position 1–22) and GPI motif (aa, 270–287) are indicated. Truncated Pv32 (23–269 aa) was constructed for expression. The red bar indicates the cysteine residue position. SP signal peptide, GPI glycosylphosphatidylinositol. b The purification progress of Pv32 (58 kDa) was resolved by 12% SDS-PAGE. T total, S supernatant, P pellet, Ft flow-through, E elution. c Western blot analysis of recombinant Pv32 with anti-GST antibody (GST), rabbit immune sera (R), pooled P. vivax patient sera (P), PBS-immunized rabbit sera (NR), and non-infected human sera (H). Arrowheads indicate specific bands for each recombinant protein
IgG responses to recombinant Pv32 and GST control proteins in the sera of vivax patients and healthy individuals
| Protein | No. of patient samples ( | MFIe | 95% CIb | No. of healthy samples ( | MFIe | 95% CIb | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | Total (%)a | Positive | Negative | Total (%)c | ||||||
| Pv32 | 38 | 59 | 96 (39.6) | 6252 | 29.8–49.4 | 1 | 95 | 96 (99.0) | 2879 | 97.0–100 | < 0.0001 |
| GST | 0 | 30 | 30 (0.0) | 2895 | 0 | 30 | 30 (100) | 2880 |
| ||
aSero positive rate: % of positive in-patient samples
bConfidence intervals
cSero negative rate: % of negative in healthy samples
dDifferences in the total IgG prevalence for each antigen between vivax patients and healthy individuals were calculated with Student’s t-test, p < 0.05 considered as statistically significant; ns, not significantly different
eMFI: mean fluorescence intensities were divided by cut off value + standard deviation above the mean fluorescence intensity of the malaria naïve samples
Fig. 2Localization of Pv32 in mature schizont-stage parasites. Schizont-stage parasites were dual-labeled with rabbit antisera against Pv32 (red) and PvMSP1-19 (merozoite surface marker, green). Nuclei are stained with DAPI in the merged images. Scale bars represent 2.5 µm. DIC, differential interference contrast
Fig. 3Sliding window (size = 100 bp, length = 25 bp) analysis of genetic diversity (π) across the pv32 gene from worldwide P. vivax isolates
Estimates of DNA sequence polymorphism of the pv32 gene
| No. sample (n) | No. polymorphisms | No. haplotypes (h) | Haplotype diversity (Hd) | Nucleotide diversity (π) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | 11 | 16 | 0.761 | 0.00280 |
Fig. 4Median-joining networks of 16 pv32 haplotypes of P. vivax isolates from 11 countries. The genealogical haplotype network showing relationships among 16 pv32 haplotypes of P. vivax from 11 countries. ‘H’ numbers designate the haplotype number, the size of each circle represents the frequencies of the haplotype, and unnumbered circles represent a single haplotype. Geographical haplotypes are indicated by the color key. Distances between nodes are arbitrary