| Literature DB >> 30053413 |
Carlos Henrique de Lemos Muller1, Anderson Rech2, Cíntia Ehlers Botton3, Helena Trevisan Schroeder1, Patricia Martins Bock4, Juliano Boufleur Farinha5, Pedro Lopez5, Cinthia Maria Schöler1, Gisele Bettú Grigolo1, Jerônimo Coelho1, Lucas Stahlhöfer Kowalewski1, Maria Inês Lavina Rodrigues1, Marcela Alves de Azevedo1, André Quincozes-Santos6, Josianne Rodrigues-Krause5, Alvaro Reischak-Oliveira5, Ronei Silveira Pinto5, Giuseppe De Vito7, Paulo Ivo Homem de Bittencourt Júnior1, Mauricio Krause8.
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that the anti-inflammatory heat shock response (HSR) is reduced in aging and diabetes. In this study we compared HSR between healthy middle-aged adults, healthy elderly and type 2 diabetic (T2DM) elderly, and tested whether resistance training (RT) could improve the HSR in T2DM group. Thirty sedentary participants volunteered for this study. HSR (assessed as the capacity to export HSP72 during heat stress) was measured in the blood and compared between the groups. HSR was similar between healthy middle-aged and healthy elderly volunteers, but diminished in elderly T2DM (p < 0.001). Hence, T2DM subjects (n = 12) were submitted to a 12-week RT program, because exercise is a physiological HSR inducer. HSR, cytokines, metabolic parameters and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) were measured before and after the RT. Remarkably, VAT was negatively correlated with HSR (r = - 0.49, p < 0.01) while RT improved the HSR and reduced inflammation [TNF-α: from 51.5 ± 9 to 40.7 ± 4 pg/mL and TNF-α/IL-10 ratio: from 1.55 ± 0.3 to 1.16 ± 0.2 (p < 0.001)], without affecting other parameters. All together, these findings confirm the hypothesis that the anti-inflammatory HSR is depressed in elderly diabetic people, but can be partially restored by RT.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Blood mononuclear cells; Heat shock response; Resistance training; Type 2 diabetes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30053413 DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.07.014
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Gerontol ISSN: 0531-5565 Impact factor: 4.032