Literature DB >> 3005314

Structure and function of the Ah receptor for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Species difference in molecular properties of the receptors from mouse and rat hepatic cytosols.

M S Denison, L M Vella, A B Okey.   

Abstract

Molecular properties of cytosolic Ah receptors from livers of Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6N mice were assessed by velocity sedimentation on sucrose gradients and by gel permeation chromatography on Sephacryl S-300. Analyses were done under conditions of both moderate ionic strength (presence of 0.1 M KCl) and high ionic strength (0.4 M KCl). [3H] 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) was used as the radioligand. In conditions of moderate ionic strength the receptor from Sprague-Dawley rat liver sedimented at 8.8 +/- 0.05 S, had a Stokes radius of 7.0 +/- 0.21 nm, and an apparent relative molecular mass (Mr) of 257,000 +/- 7,700. In conditions of high ionic strength the Ah receptor from rat hepatic cytosol dissociated to a [3H]TCDD-binding subunit which sedimented at 5.6 +/- 0.58 S, had a Stokes radius of 5.2 +/- 0.24 nm, and an apparent Mr of 121,000 +/- 5,600. The Ah receptor from liver of C57BL/6N mice, in moderate ionic strength conditions, sedimented at 9.4 +/- 0.54 S, had a Stokes radius of 7.1 +/- 0.12 nm, and an apparent Mr of 277,000 +/- 4,800. Whereas the Ah receptor from rat liver readily dissociated into a [3H]TCDD-binding subunit during brief exposure to 0.4 M KCl, the mouse Ah receptor resisted dissociation. When exposed to 0.4 M KCl for 2 h, the mouse Ah receptor remained at the same molecular size that it had exhibited in moderate ionic strength conditions. Prolonged exposure (16 h) to 0.4 M KCl prior to analysis partially converted the mouse Ah receptor into a smaller [3H]TCDD-binding subunit which sedimented at 4.9 +/- 0.07 S, had a Stokes radius of 5.2 +/- 0.19 nm, and an apparent Mr of 105,000 +/- 3,800. The potency of seven different Ah receptor agonists in competing with [3H]TCDD for specific receptor sites was slightly different in mouse cytosol than in rat cytosol. By criteria of size, response to high ionic strength environments, and ligand binding preferences the mouse and rat Ah receptors appear to be similar but not identical molecular species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3005314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Ah receptor and the mechanism of dioxin toxicity.

Authors:  J P Landers; N J Bunce
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  The p38 MAPK inhibitor SB203580 induces cytochrome P450 1A1 gene expression in murine and human hepatoma cell lines through ligand-dependent aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation.

Authors:  Hesham M Korashy; Anwar Anwar-Mohamed; Anatoly A Soshilov; Michael S Denison; Ayman O S El-Kadi
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.739

3.  Comparison of TCDD-elicited genome-wide hepatic gene expression in Sprague-Dawley rats and C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Rance Nault; Suntae Kim; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Interaction of diuron and related substituted phenylureas with the Ah receptor pathway.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; David S Baston; Bruce Hammock; Michael S Denison
Journal:  J Biochem Mol Toxicol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.642

5.  Comparative analysis of temporal and dose-dependent TCDD-elicited gene expression in human, mouse, and rat primary hepatocytes.

Authors:  Agnes L Forgacs; Edward Dere; Michelle M Angrish; Timothy R Zacharewski
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Detection of interaction of binding affinity of aromatic hydrocarbon receptor to the specific DNA by exonuclease protection mediated PCR assay.

Authors:  Xi Sun; Shunqing Xu
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2005

7.  Induction of hepatic CYP1A activity as a biomarker for environmental exposure to Aroclor 1254 in feral rodents.

Authors:  R A Lubet; R W Nims; L E Beebe; S D Fox; H J Issaq; K McBee
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Anatoly A Soshilov; Guochun He; Danica E DeGroot; Bin Zhao
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Persistent binding of ligands to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Jessica E Bohonowych; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  The molecular basis for differential dioxin sensitivity in birds: role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Sibel I Karchner; Diana G Franks; Sean W Kennedy; Mark E Hahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-04-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.