Literature DB >> 30052304

Long-term evaluation of a fully magnetically levitated circulatory support device for advanced heart failure-two-year results from the HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study.

Jan D Schmitto1, Yuriy Pya2, Daniel Zimpfer3, Thomas Krabatsch4, Jens Garbade5, Vivek Rao6, Michiel Morshuis7, Friedhelm Beyersdorf8, Silvana Marasco9, Poornima Sood10, Laura Damme10, Ivan Netuka11.   

Abstract

AIM: This study aimed to assess safety and outcomes of patients, 2 years after implantation with the HeartMate 3 Left Ventricular Assist System. METHODS AND
RESULTS: This study included 50 adults with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IIIB or IV symptoms or American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association stage D heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤25% and a cardiac index ≤2.2 L/min/m2 without inotropes, or inotrope-dependent with optimal medical management, or listed for heart transplant. The median duration of left ventricular assist device support was 694 days (range: 19-833 days). At baseline, cardiac index was 1.8 ±0.5 L/min/m2 , 58% of patients were receiving inotropes, and 92% were INTERMACS profiles 2-4. At 2 years, Kaplan-Meier survival was 74 ±6%, 5 (10%) patients were transplanted, and 32 patients (64%) remain with support. Adverse event rates include bleeding requiring surgery (16%), gastrointestinal bleeding (20%), driveline infection (24%), ischaemic stroke (16%), haemorrhagic stroke (8%), right heart failure (14%), and outflow graft thrombosis (2%). Notably, no haemolysis, pump thrombosis, or pump malfunction events occurred. At 2 years, 47% of patients remained in NYHA class I and 41% in NYHA class II (P <0.0001). From baseline to 2 years, the mean six-minute walk distance increased from 239 m to 347 m (P <0.0001), and the mean EQ-5D quality of life score improved from 48.2 to 70.6 (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Two years post-HeartMate 3 implantation, results show expected and acceptable survival, enhanced haemocompatibility, improved patient functional status and quality of life. This corroborates the success of HeartMate 3 since its first-in-man implantation case in Germany. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02170363.
© 2018 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2018 European Society of Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart failure; HeartMate 3; Left ventricular assist system; Magnetic levitation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30052304     DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail        ISSN: 1388-9842            Impact factor:   15.534


  14 in total

Review 1.  Remote monitoring for better management of LVAD patients: the potential benefits of CardioMEMS.

Authors:  Jesse F Veenis; Jasper J Brugts
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2020-01-24

2.  Is this the right MOMENTUM?-evidence from a HeartMate 3 randomized trial.

Authors:  Silvia Mariani; Anamika Chatterjee; Jasmin S Hanke; Katharina Homann; Günes Dogan; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Outflow graft twisting of Heartmate III left ventricular-assisted device: A case report.

Authors:  Oğuz Konukoğlu; Denyan Mansuroğlu; Özgür Yıldırım; Shiraslan Bakshaliyev; Kenan Sever; Mehmet Balkanay
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

4.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices-a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas McNamara; Harry Narroway; Michael Williams; John Brookes; James Farag; David Cistulli; Paul Bannon; Silvana Marasco; Evgenij Potapov; Antonio Loforte
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

5.  Sex differences in outcomes following less-invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

Authors:  Silvia Mariani; Tong Li; Karl Bounader; Dietmar Boethig; Alexandra Schöde; Jasmin S Hanke; Jana Michaelis; L Christian Napp; Dominik Berliner; Guenes Dogan; Roberto Lorusso; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-03

6.  18F-FDG PET/CT in Left-Ventricular Assist Device Infection: Initial Results Supporting the Usefulness of Image-Guided Therapy.

Authors:  Jan M Sommerlath Sohns; Hannah Kröhn; Alexandra Schöde; Thorsten Derlin; Axel Haverich; Jan D Schmitto; Frank M Bengel
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 11.082

7.  Interpreting Neurologic Outcomes in a Changing Trial Design Landscape: An Analysis of HeartWare Left Ventricular Assist Device Using a Hybrid Intention to Treat Population.

Authors:  Claudius Mahr; Duc Thinh Pham; Nahush A Mokadam; Scott C Silvestry; Jennifer Cowger; Michael S Kiernan; David A D'alessandro; Erin E Coglianese; Muhammad Faraz Masood; Robert L Kormos; Mary V Jacoski; Jeffrey J Teuteberg
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 8.  A Rising Hope of an Artificial Heart: Left Ventricular Assisted Device - Outcome, Convenience, and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Suyeewin Thiha; Abdul Rehman Z Zaidi; Chris A Robert; Mohammed K Abbas; Bilal Haider Malik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-09-10

9.  Validation of numerically simulated ventricular flow patterns during left ventricular assist device support.

Authors:  Mojgan Ghodrati; Thananya Khienwad; Alexander Maurer; Francesco Moscato; Francesco Zonta; Heinrich Schima; Philipp Aigner
Journal:  Int J Artif Organs       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 1.595

10.  Optimal haemodynamics during left ventricular assist device support are associated with reduced haemocompatibility-related adverse events.

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Ann Nguyen; Gene Kim; Jayant Raikhelkar; Nitasha Sarswat; Sara Kalantari; Bryan Smith; Colleen Juricek; Daniel Rodgers; Takeyoshi Ota; Tae Song; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Gabriel Sayer; Nir Uriel
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 17.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.