Literature DB >> 30051901

Is zeroth order crystal structure prediction (CSP_0) coming to maturity? What should we aim for in an ideal crystal structure prediction code?

Sarah L Price1.   

Abstract

Crystal structure prediction based on searching for the global minimum in the lattice energy (CSP_0) is growing in use for guiding the discovery of new materials, for example, new functional materials, new phases of interest to planetary scientists and new polymorphs relevant to pharmaceutical development. This Faraday Discussion can assess the progress of CSP_0 over the range of types of materials to which CSP is currently and could be applied, which depends on our ability to model the variety of interatomic forces in crystals. The basic hypothesis, that the outcome of crystallisation is determined by thermodynamics, needs examining by considering methods of modelling relative thermodynamic stability not only as a function of pressure and temperature, but also of size, solvent and the presence of heterogeneous templates or impurities (CSP_thd). Given that many important materials persist, and indeed may be formed, when they are not the most thermodynamically stable structure, we need to define what would be required of an ideal CSP code (CSP_aim).

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30051901     DOI: 10.1039/c8fd00121a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Faraday Discuss        ISSN: 1359-6640            Impact factor:   4.008


  7 in total

1.  Reliable crystal structure predictions from first principles.

Authors:  Rahul Nikhar; Krzysztof Szalewicz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Modeling the α- and β-resorcinol phase boundary via combination of density functional theory and density functional tight-binding.

Authors:  Cameron Cook; Jessica L McKinley; Gregory J O Beran
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  Mining predicted crystal structure landscapes with high throughput crystallisation: old molecules, new insights.

Authors:  Peng Cui; David P McMahon; Peter R Spackman; Ben M Alston; Marc A Little; Graeme M Day; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 4.  The Relevance of Crystal Forms in the Pharmaceutical Field: Sword of Damocles or Innovation Tools?

Authors:  Dario Braga; Lucia Casali; Fabrizia Grepioni
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 5.  Control and prediction of the organic solid state: a challenge to theory and experiment.

Authors:  Sarah L Price
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Computational modelling as a tool in structural science.

Authors:  C Richard A Catlow
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2020-08-29       Impact factor: 4.769

7.  Minimizing Polymorphic Risk through Cooperative Computational and Experimental Exploration.

Authors:  Christopher R Taylor; Matthew T Mulvee; Domonkos S Perenyi; Michael R Probert; Graeme M Day; Jonathan W Steed
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 15.419

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.