Literature DB >> 30051635

Social value, clinical equipoise, and research in a public health emergency.

Alex John London1.   

Abstract

The 2016 CIOMS International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans states that 'health-related research should form an integral part of disaster response' and that, 'widespread emergency use [of unproven interventions] with inadequate data collection about patient outcomes must therefore be avoided' (Guideline 20). This position is defended against two lines of criticism that emerged during the 2014 Ebola outbreak. One holds that desperately ill patients have a moral right to try unvalidated medical interventions (UMIs) and that it is therefore unethical to restrict access to UMIs to the clinical trial context. The second holds that clinical trials in contexts of high-mortality diseases are morally suspect because equipoise does not exist between a standard of care that offers little prospect of clinical benefit and a UMI that might offer some clinical advantage.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CIOMS guidelines; Ebola; equipoise; public health emergencies; research ethics; right to try

Year:  2018        PMID: 30051635     DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  11 in total

1.  Opinion: It's ethical to test promising coronavirus vaccines against less-promising ones.

Authors:  Nir Eyal; Marc Lipsitch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Antiviral Therapy during the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: Is It Appropriate to Treat Patients in the Absence of Significant Evidence?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr

3.  Evaluating Promising Investigational Medical Countermeasures: Recommendations in the Absence of Guidelines.

Authors:  Nahid Bhadelia; Lauren Sauer; Theodore J Cieslak; Richard T Davey; Susan McLellan; Timothy M Uyeki; Mark G Kortepeter
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2019-02-06

Review 4.  Philosophical Foundations of Human Research Ethics.

Authors:  David B Resnik
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 0.941

Review 5.  Artificial intelligence in medicine: Overcoming or recapitulating structural challenges to improving patient care?

Authors:  Alex John London
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2022-04-27

Review 6.  Ethically designing research to inform multidimensional, rapidly evolving policy decisions: Lessons learned from the PROMISE HIV Perinatal Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Seema K Shah; Alex John London; Lynne Mofenson; James V Lavery; Grace John-Stewart; Patricia Flynn; Gerhard Theron; Shrikhant I Bangdiwala; Dhayendre Moodley; Lameck Chinula; Lee Fairlie; Tumalano Sekoto; Tebogo J Kakhu; Avy Violari; Sufia Dadabhai; Katie McCarthy; Mary Glenn Fowler
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 2.599

Review 7.  Misinformation During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Outbreak: How Knowledge Emerges From Noise.

Authors:  Bram Rochwerg; Rachael Parke; Srinivas Murthy; Shannon M Fernando; Jeanna Parsons Leigh; John Marshall; Neill K J Adhikari; Kirsten Fiest; Rob Fowler; François Lamontagne; Jonathan E Sevransky
Journal:  Crit Care Explor       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 8.  The truths behind the statistics of surgical treatment for hypertensive brainstem hemorrhage in China: a review.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Zheng; Shang-Wen Shi; Jian Gong
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 2.800

9.  Ethical considerations for epidemic vaccine trials.

Authors:  Joshua Teperowski Monrad
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  A systematic literature review of the ethics of conducting research in the humanitarian setting.

Authors:  William Bruno; Rohini J Haar
Journal:  Confl Health       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 2.723

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.