A F Best1, J E Hilbert2, L Wood3, W B Martens2, N Nikolenko3, C Marini-Bettolo3, H Lochmüller3,4,5, P S Rosenberg1, R T Moxley2, M H Greene6, S M Gadalla6. 1. Biostatistics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. 2. Department of Neurology, Neuromuscular Disease Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. 3. John Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. 4. Department of Neuropediatrics and Muscle Disorders, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 5. Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico (CNAG-CRG), Center for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona, Spain. 6. Clinical Genetics Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research indicates that patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) are at increased risk of cancer and early death. Family data may provide insights given DM1 phenotypic heterogeneity, the broad range of non-muscular manifestations and the usual delays in the diagnosis of DM1. METHOD: Family history data were collected from 397 genetically and/or clinically confirmed DM1 patients (respondents) enrolled in the US or UK myotonic dystrophy registries. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated for DM1 first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and offspring) by their reported DM1 status (affected, unaffected or unknown). For cancer-related analyses, mixed effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with cancer development in DM1 families, including familial clustering. RESULTS: A total of 467 deaths and 337 cancers were reported amongst 1737 first-degree DM1 relatives. Mortality risk amongst relatives reported as DM1-unaffected was comparable to that of the general population [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 0.82, P = 0.06], whilst significantly higher mortality risks were noted in DM1-affected relatives (SMR = 2.47, P < 0.0001) and in those whose DM1 status was unknown (SMR = 1.60, P < 0.0001). In cancer risk analyses, risk was higher amongst families in which the DM1 respondent had cancer (odds ratio 1.95, P = 0.0001). Unknown DM1 status in the siblings (odds ratio 2.59, P = 0.004) was associated with higher cancer risk. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk of death, and probably cancer, in relatives with DM1 and in those whose DM1 status is unknown. This suggests a need to perform a careful history and physical examination, supplemented by genetic testing, to identify family members at risk for DM1 and who might benefit from disease-specific clinical care and surveillance.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Research indicates that patients with myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) are at increased risk of cancer and early death. Family data may provide insights given DM1 phenotypic heterogeneity, the broad range of non-muscular manifestations and the usual delays in the diagnosis of DM1. METHOD: Family history data were collected from 397 genetically and/or clinically confirmed DM1patients (respondents) enrolled in the US or UK myotonic dystrophy registries. Standardized mortality ratios were calculated for DM1 first-degree relatives (parents, siblings and offspring) by their reported DM1 status (affected, unaffected or unknown). For cancer-related analyses, mixed effects logistic regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with cancer development in DM1 families, including familial clustering. RESULTS: A total of 467 deaths and 337 cancers were reported amongst 1737 first-degree DM1 relatives. Mortality risk amongst relatives reported as DM1-unaffected was comparable to that of the general population [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 0.82, P = 0.06], whilst significantly higher mortality risks were noted in DM1-affected relatives (SMR = 2.47, P < 0.0001) and in those whose DM1 status was unknown (SMR = 1.60, P < 0.0001). In cancer risk analyses, risk was higher amongst families in which the DM1 respondent had cancer (odds ratio 1.95, P = 0.0001). Unknown DM1 status in the siblings (odds ratio 2.59, P = 0.004) was associated with higher cancer risk. CONCLUSION: There is an increased risk of death, and probably cancer, in relatives with DM1 and in those whose DM1 status is unknown. This suggests a need to perform a careful history and physical examination, supplemented by genetic testing, to identify family members at risk for DM1 and who might benefit from disease-specific clinical care and surveillance.
Authors: Shahinaz M Gadalla; Marie Lund; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sanne Gørtz; Christine M Mueller; Richard T Moxley; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Magnus Björkholm; Fatma M Shebl; James E Hilbert; Ola Landgren; Jan Wohlfahrt; Mads Melbye; Mark H Greene Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-12-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: C E de Die-Smulders; C J Höweler; C Thijs; J F Mirandolle; H B Anten; H J Smeets; K E Chandler; J P Geraedts Journal: Brain Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Y H Fu; A Pizzuti; R G Fenwick; J King; S Rajnarayan; P W Dunne; J Dubel; G A Nasser; T Ashizawa; P de Jong Journal: Science Date: 1992-03-06 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Christine M Mueller; James E Hilbert; William Martens; Charles A Thornton; Richard T Moxley; Mark H Greene Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: J D Brook; M E McCurrach; H G Harley; A J Buckler; D Church; H Aburatani; K Hunter; V P Stanton; J P Thirion; T Hudson Journal: Cell Date: 1992-02-21 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: M Lund; L J Diaz; S Gørtz; B Feenstra; M Duno; I Juncker; H Eiberg; J Vissing; J Wohlfahrt; M Melbye Journal: Eur J Neurol Date: 2014-05-17 Impact factor: 6.089
Authors: Shahinaz M Gadalla; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Magnus Björkholm; James E Hilbert; Richard T Moxley; Ola Landgren; Mark H Greene Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Cecilia Higgs; James E Hilbert; Libby Wood; William B Martens; Chiara Marini-Bettolo; Nikoletta Nikolenko; Rotana Alsaggaf; Hanns Lochmüller; Richard T Moxley; Mark H Greene; Youjin Wang; Shahinaz M Gadalla Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Sylvia Nieuwenhuis; Kees Okkersen; Joanna Widomska; Paul Blom; Peter A C 't Hoen; Baziel van Engelen; Jeffrey C Glennon Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-11-26 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Eva Alegre-Cortés; Alberto Giménez-Bejarano; Elisabet Uribe-Carretero; Marta Paredes-Barquero; André R A Marques; Mafalda Lopes-da-Silva; Otília V Vieira; Saray Canales-Cortés; Pedro J Camello; Guadalupe Martínez-Chacón; Ana Aiastui; Roberto Fernández-Torrón; Adolfo López de Munain; Patricia Gomez-Suaga; Mireia Niso-Santano; Rosa A González-Polo; José M Fuentes; Sokhna M S Yakhine-Diop Journal: Cells Date: 2022-09-27 Impact factor: 7.666