LaVone Smith1, Lukasz Myc1, Denny Watson1,2, George A Beller1, Jamieson M Bourque3,4. 1. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800662, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 3. Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Imaging Center, University of Virginia Health System, Box 800662, 1215 Lee Street, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. jamieson2@gmail.com. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, USA. jamieson2@gmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients who achieve ≥ 10 METS during exercise SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) have very low rates of significant ischemia and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). It is unknown how many older adults can achieve ≥ 10 METS, and if low risk extends to this subgroup. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the workload achieved, prevalence and predictors of ischemia, and MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal MI, late revascularization) in a cohort of 382 patients ≥ 65 years of age who underwent exercise 99mTc SPECT MPI. The cohort was 64.4% male and 36.9% had known coronary artery disease (CAD). All achieved ≥ 85% of maximum age-predicted heart rate. A workload of ≥ 10 METS was achieved in 25.4%; 50.3% attained 7-9 METS, and 24.4% reached < 7 METS. There was a stepwise decrease in prevalence of any ischemia and significant ischemia (≥ 10% of the left ventricle (LV)) as workload increased (P = 0.037). Patients achieving ≥ 10 METS had a 3.1% prevalence of ≥ 10% LV ischemia (1.2% in those without ST depression). Cardiac death and MACE rates in the ≥ 10 METS subgroup were 0.6%/year and 2.6%/year over a median 7.0 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of older adults who undergo exercise SPECT MPI can achieve ≥ 10 METS. This subgroup has low rates of significant LV ischemia and MACE. The favorable diagnostic and prognostic implications of achieving a high workload in an older adult population suggest it is feasible, with certain exceptions, to include this subgroup in workload-based strategies of provisional imaging.
BACKGROUND:Patients who achieve ≥ 10 METS during exercise SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) have very low rates of significant ischemia and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). It is unknown how many older adults can achieve ≥ 10 METS, and if low risk extends to this subgroup. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined the workload achieved, prevalence and predictors of ischemia, and MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal MI, late revascularization) in a cohort of 382 patients ≥ 65 years of age who underwent exercise 99mTc SPECT MPI. The cohort was 64.4% male and 36.9% had known coronary artery disease (CAD). All achieved ≥ 85% of maximum age-predicted heart rate. A workload of ≥ 10 METS was achieved in 25.4%; 50.3% attained 7-9 METS, and 24.4% reached < 7 METS. There was a stepwise decrease in prevalence of any ischemia and significant ischemia (≥ 10% of the left ventricle (LV)) as workload increased (P = 0.037). Patients achieving ≥ 10 METS had a 3.1% prevalence of ≥ 10% LV ischemia (1.2% in those without ST depression). Cardiac death and MACE rates in the ≥ 10 METS subgroup were 0.6%/year and 2.6%/year over a median 7.0 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of older adults who undergo exercise SPECT MPI can achieve ≥ 10 METS. This subgroup has low rates of significant LV ischemia and MACE. The favorable diagnostic and prognostic implications of achieving a high workload in an older adult population suggest it is feasible, with certain exceptions, to include this subgroup in workload-based strategies of provisional imaging.
Authors: W Lane Duvall; John A Savino; Elliot J Levine; Luke K Hermann; Lori B Croft; Milena J Henzlova Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2014-11-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Peter Kokkinos; Jonathan Myers; Charles Faselis; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Michael Doumas; Andreas Pittaras; Athanasios Manolis; John Peter Kokkinos; Pamela Karasik; Michael Greenberg; Vasilios Papademetriou; Ross Fletcher Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-08-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Rory Hachamovitch; Alan Rozanski; Sean W Hayes; Louise E J Thomson; Guido Germano; John D Friedman; Ishac Cohen; Daniel S Berman Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Jonathan Myers; Manish Prakash; Victor Froelicher; Dat Do; Sara Partington; J Edwin Atwood Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-03-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka; Christopher G Scott; S Michael Gharacholou; Robert B McCully Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: D B Mark; L Shaw; F E Harrell; M A Hlatky; K L Lee; J R Bengtson; C B McCants; R M Califf; D B Pryor Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1991-09-19 Impact factor: 91.245